Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by on August 13, 2008, 2:00 pm
Please log in for more thread options I watched this video last night and found it fascinating The idea was to make each car in the US a combo wifi repeater..... so that each car sends and receives data but also relays other's data as well. This would create one huge shore to shore free wifi network such that the economic implications would be enormous. How feasible is all this? And can one easily create a mesh network in their home or even neighborhood? see the video http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/robin_chase_on_zipcar_and_her_next_big_idea.html | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by DTC on August 13, 2008, 7:09 pm
Please log in for more thread options me@privacy.net wrote: Shore to shore, huh? So that means about 3,000 car per square mile even distributed across the U.S. > How feasible is all this?
Totally not feasible. But that is to be expected from people that have no idea how wireless works. Let me guess...you're thinking that a wireless signal can go several miles from car to car. You're thinking a signal can be repeated hundreds of hops from car to car to car to car. > And can one easily create a mesh network
> in their home or even neighborhood? Municipal mesh networks have been a dismal failure. So no...one can not easily create a neighborhood mesh network. | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Le Chaud Lapin on August 14, 2008, 1:51 am
Please log in for more thread options
> m...@privacy.net wrote:
> > This would create one huge shore to
> > shore free wifi network such that the > > economic implications would be enormous. >
> Shore to shore, huh? =A0So that means about 3,000 > car per square mile even distributed across the U.S. > > > How feasible is all this?
>
> Totally not feasible. But that is to be expected from people > that have no idea how wireless works. Hmm...I think you have to qualify that statement a bit, since, technically it is feasible. The end-to-end delay would be far from optimal, however. > Let me guess...you're thinking that a wireless signal can go several
> miles from car to car. You're thinking a signal can be repeated > hundreds of hops from car to car to car to car. It can, if Layer-3 routing is used. However, I will concede that some cheating would be required (topological cheating that is). > > And can one easily create a mesh network
> > in their home or even neighborhood? >
> Municipal mesh networks have been a dismal failure. So no...one > can not easily create a neighborhood mesh network. Now this is very doable, using existing hardware, and new software. Not sure how hard it is to do with TCP/IP and related topology- discovery algorithms, but if one rearchitects a new protocol in parallel TCP/IP, I think it would be frighteningly simple, relatively speaking. -Le Chaud Lapin- | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by on August 14, 2008, 12:52 pm
Please log in for more thread options
wrote: >Place your bets on this one:
><http://www.open-mesh.com/store/> >On a small scale (apartment building) it might work. On a city wide >scale, forget it. I might give that one a try! | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by DanS on August 14, 2008, 5:32 pm
Please log in for more thread options
a6a8-5d1ce925938f@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com: >> m...@privacy.net wrote:
>> > This would create one huge shore to
>> > shore free wifi network such that the >> > economic implications would be enormous. >>
>> Shore to shore, huh? So that means about 3,000 >> car per square mile even distributed across the U.S. >> >> > How feasible is all this?
>>
>> Totally not feasible. But that is to be expected from people >> that have no idea how wireless works. >
> Hmm...I think you have to qualify that statement a bit, since, > technically it is feasible. The end-to-end delay would be far from > optimal, however. > >> Let me guess...you're thinking that a wireless signal can go several
>> miles from car to car. You're thinking a signal can be repeated >> hundreds of hops from car to car to car to car. >
> It can, if Layer-3 routing is used. However, I will concede that some > cheating would be required (topological cheating that is). My company recently started design of an IP 900 mHz SS radio. I've been in a constant battle for the past two months with the decision- maker........I want the design to be a Layer3 routing device, but he wants it to be just a bridging device, because it's 'easier to get working' is his argument. I can see his point, because all of the companies we deal with that win bids for contracts, seem to have really no clue about how wireless really works. But still....... | |||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Mesh Networks: Possible to make one for perosnal use? | August 13, 2008, 2:00 pm |
| AODV based firmware to make WRT54G be part of a Mesh | October 25, 2004, 12:31 am |
| Mesh Networks | October 21, 2004, 1:14 am |
| mesh networks | January 18, 2005, 11:18 am |
| Mesh Networks using Ad hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) routing | February 7, 2006, 7:05 pm |
| is 802.16d a mesh? | March 16, 2006, 2:49 pm |
| WRT54* in mesh | October 25, 2007, 7:58 am |
| Locustworld Mesh Networking | October 22, 2004, 7:53 pm |
| Locustworld.com - AP Mesh boxes... | September 27, 2005, 12:08 pm |
| Testing A Mesh Network | January 26, 2007, 12:13 pm |
| Setting up a mesh wifi | September 2, 2007, 1:59 pm |
| WDS mesh and dual vs single radio | November 28, 2006, 7:32 pm |
| WiMax security in mesh mode | November 30, 2006, 3:36 pm |
| NEWS: What a tangled mesh we weave | February 1, 2007, 4:57 pm |
| Wireless mesh as a partial solution | September 3, 2007, 2:25 pm |

Mesh Networks: Possible to make one for perosnal use?
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 








> shore free wifi network such that the
> economic implications would be enormous.