Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
||||||||||
|
Posted by on August 8, 2006, 2:57 pm
Please log in for more thread options specifically I see the point of encrypting the whole network. But why use tunneling? why not just encrypt the data portion of the packet? I know im' missing something. But VPNs use tunneling, and with tunneling, the whole packet is encapsulated in another packet, and a new header generated. This is good if a network is IPX and needs to send over the Internet which is IP, then tunneling is a way. But what's the point if it doesn't do that - it isn't using IPX, it uses IP too? Tunneling only increases privacy if there are systems in between whose IPs are used. So if A is communicating with B, by doing A->A1->....-->B1->B then the IPs used between A1 and B1 are those of
A1 and B1. Thus guarding the IPs of A and B. But this isn't the case,
or typically isn't the case. thanks | ||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| why does windows xp offer vpn set up? | August 8, 2006, 2:57 pm |
| VPN, Windows XP and Windows mobile | March 21, 2007, 1:38 pm |
| Windows VPN | April 11, 2005, 3:25 pm |
| Sonicwall VPN - Windows XP | August 22, 2005, 9:35 am |
| Linux to windows vpn | May 12, 2006, 9:56 am |
| vpn for windows 2003 server? | April 11, 2005, 4:29 pm |
| RFQ for SPI NATing support under Windows CE | April 21, 2005, 2:34 am |
| openvpn windows xp client | August 25, 2005, 7:45 am |
| Creare un server vpn su Windows 98 | October 5, 2005, 9:27 am |
| VPN with Windows freeze trouble | January 29, 2006, 9:08 pm |
| windows client development | January 25, 2007, 4:22 am |
| Windows VPN client and group authentication | April 18, 2005, 6:13 pm |
| connecting Cisco with Linux or Windows | April 29, 2005, 8:18 pm |
| Any suggestions running MS-CHAP vs 2 on windows 98 SE? | May 13, 2005, 10:37 pm |
| Configuring Cisco VPN Client / Windows XP | July 22, 2005, 11:00 am |

why does windows xp offer vpn set up?
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 