SIP vs p2pSIP
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by on June 5, 2007, 6:06 pm
Please log in for more thread options well with server virtualization and nice blade servers i dont really see why we need p2pSIP but it is on the way anyhow. what im wondering really is if it not a good idea to write SIP applications at this time, should I wait untill p2pSIP is finalized? | ||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Balwinder S Dheeman on June 5, 2007, 11:33 pm
Please log in for more thread options On 06/06/2007 03:36 AM, QoS@domain.invalid wrote: Instead of pondering over the future and, or p2pSIP, I for one shall act per immediate needs of the day itself. If I'm not wrong the p2pSIP is nothing but same SIP with P2P extensions; and is still in its infancy and, or experimental stage. -- Dr Balwinder S "bsd" Dheeman Registered Linux User: #229709 Anu'z Linux@HOME Machines: #168573, 170593, 259192 Chandigarh, UT, 160062, India Gentoo, Fedora, Debian/FreeBSD/XP Home: http://cto.homelinux.net/~bsd/ Visit: http://counter.li.org/ | ||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| SIP vs p2pSIP | June 5, 2007, 6:06 pm |
> really see why we need p2pSIP but it is on the way anyhow.
>
> what im wondering really is if it not a good idea to write SIP
> applications at this time, should I wait untill p2pSIP is finalized?