V.35 cabling question..
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Eugene Blanchard on May 6, 2005, 5:56 pm
Please log in for more thread options I have to wire up several routers using V.35 for fractional T-1 line to a cross connect. What type of cabling should I use? I was planning on using Cat3 or 5 but since part of the signalling is balanced and the other signals are unbalanced. What do I do with the unbalanced signals? Do I pair them up with ground or don't worry about it. The run is about 50 feet. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Floyd L. Davidson on May 6, 2005, 11:28 pm
Please log in for more thread options You can use tip or ring of a pair and 1) put nothing on the other side, 2) put another control signal on the other side, or 3) ground the other side. All are about equal, though pairing with another signal has slightly higher risk of crosstalk. -- Floyd L. Davidson <http://web.newsguy.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@barrow.com
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Doug McIntyre on May 7, 2005, 6:21 am
Please log in for more thread options
>I have to wire up several routers using V.35 for fractional T-1 line to a
>cross connect. What type of cabling should I use? Is it really worth the expense to do cross-connect at the V.35 level? Thats got to what, tripple or quadruple the cost of an already expensive connector to work with? I would cross-connect at the T1 level, and treat the CSU/DSU's V.35 output as integral to the router and port it hooks up to. A lot less wires to worry about hooking up. Loads and loads cheaper to work with. I've never seen it implemented that way in my experiences. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Eugene Blanchard on May 7, 2005, 7:12 am
Please log in for more thread options
Its for a lab in a school. It allows the students to wire the connections and adds flexibility. Doug McIntyre wrote: >>I have to wire up several routers using V.35 for fractional T-1 line to a
>>cross connect. What type of cabling should I use? >
> Is it really worth the expense to do cross-connect at the V.35 level? > Thats got to what, tripple or quadruple the cost of an already > expensive connector to work with? > > I would cross-connect at the T1 level, and treat the CSU/DSU's V.35 > output as integral to the router and port it hooks up to. A lot less > wires to worry about hooking up. Loads and loads cheaper to work with. > > I've never seen it implemented that way in my experiences. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Reed on May 7, 2005, 7:18 am
Please log in for more thread options
Eugene Blanchard wrote: >
> I have to wire up several routers using V.35 for fractional T-1 line to a > cross connect. What type of cabling should I use? > > I was planning on using Cat3 or 5 but since part of the signalling is > balanced and the other signals are unbalanced. What do I do with the > unbalanced signals? Do I pair them up with ground or don't worry about it. > The run is about 50 feet. Following quoted from http://www.sangoma.com/signal.htm "V.35 is a mixture of balanced (like RS422) and common earth (like RS232) signal interfaces. The control lines including -- DTR, DSR. DCD, RTS and CTS -- are single wire common earth interfaces, functionally compatible with RS-232 level signals. The data and clock signals are balanced, RS-422-like signals. The control signals in V.35 are common earth single wire interfaces because these signal levels are mostly constant or vary at low frequencies. The high-frequency data and clock signals are carried by balanced lines. Thus single wires are used for the low frequencies for which they are adequate, while balanced pairs are used for the high-frequency data and clock signals. The V.35 plug is standard. It is a black plastic plug about 20mm by 70mm, often with gold-plated contacts and built-in hold down and mating screws. The V.35 plug is roughly 30 times the price of a DB25, making everything to do with V.35 somewhat expensive." --reed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| V.35 cabling question.. | May 6, 2005, 5:56 pm |
| Newbridge 3624 console cabling | January 15, 2007, 11:58 am |
| RTT Question | February 21, 2005, 11:18 pm |
| ASN question... | October 10, 2007, 11:51 pm |
| sx2000 question | August 18, 2004, 1:38 am |
| Avaya question | August 18, 2004, 1:50 am |
| AT&T 1545 Question | November 24, 2004, 1:25 pm |
| DC power question | February 11, 2005, 5:46 pm |
| televantage question | August 22, 2005, 3:05 pm |
| sx2000 question | August 22, 2005, 10:35 pm |
| Telephony question | October 27, 2005, 6:12 pm |
| sx200 pri question | March 18, 2006, 1:19 am |
| T1 / PBX / Faxboard Question | February 28, 2007, 11:37 am |
| sx200 ml/el lw19 q45 question | July 4, 2005, 3:55 am |
| SX200 & 2000 T1/DMS Question | September 6, 2004, 1:51 pm |
>cross connect. What type of cabling should I use?
>
>I was planning on using Cat3 or 5 but since part of the signalling is
>balanced and the other signals are unbalanced. What do I do with the
>unbalanced signals? Do I pair them up with ground or don't worry about it.
>The run is about 50 feet.