Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by That guy. on November 29, 2004, 2:43 pm
Please log in for more thread options name/number you wish to send? http://codegods.net/cidmage/cidmage1.htm | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Isaiah Beard on November 30, 2004, 7:16 pm
Please log in for more thread options If things were simple, yes. However, in this scheme: 1. Most phones have already received the correct CID info after the first ring. Your earliest chance at sending your CID tones are after the person has answered the phone. If they have common sense, they would have already looked at the correct info before answering, and the CID equipment would still have that info stored. 2. Most modern CID equipment stops listening for CID tones after the called party has picked up, as legitimately there is nothing else to receive. The exception to this is CID-Call waiting, but even if you manage to pull that off, the party you're calling will only be fooled into thinking another call is on the line and when they hookflash, they'll hang up with you. The software isn't worth $99. Especially when similar software, with the same lack of effectiveness, is only $9 here: http://www.soft411.com/company/Whirlwind-Software/S-O-B-Caller-ID-Generator.htm Much more effective means to spoof caller ID exists through VoIP: http://www.securityfocus.com/news/9061 -- E-mail fudged to thwart spammers. Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by That guy. on December 1, 2004, 2:46 pm
Please log in for more thread options > > Is this for real? Do they just send an audio signal to mimic the caller
ID
> > name/number you wish to send?
> > http://codegods.net/cidmage/cidmage1.htm >
http://www.soft411.com/company/Whirlwind-Software/S-O-B-Caller-ID-Generator.htm > If things were simple, yes. However, in this scheme: > 1. Most phones have already received the correct CID info after the > first ring. Your earliest chance at sending your CID tones are after > the person has answered the phone. If they have common sense, they > would have already looked at the correct info before answering, and the > CID equipment would still have that info stored. > 2. Most modern CID equipment stops listening for CID tones after the > called party has picked up, as legitimately there is nothing else to > receive. The exception to this is CID-Call waiting, but even if you > manage to pull that off, the party you're calling will only be fooled > into thinking another call is on the line and when they hookflash, > they'll hang up with you. > The software isn't worth $99. Especially when similar software, with > the same lack of effectiveness, is only $9 here: > > Much more effective means to spoof caller ID exists through VoIP:
> http://www.securityfocus.com/news/9061 Is it possible to use VOIP for local calls with no charges? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Isaiah Beard on December 7, 2004, 4:23 pm
Please log in for more thread options That guy. wrote:
>>Much more effective means to spoof caller ID exists through VoIP:
>>http://www.securityfocus.com/news/9061 >
> > Is it possible to use VOIP for local calls with no charges? Depends on what service you use. Most of the major players of course, charge a monthly fee, but the fee does included local calls and often, unlimited long distance with in the US as well. -- E-mail fudged to thwart spammers. Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Rick Merrill on December 8, 2004, 7:18 pm
Please log in for more thread options That guy. wrote:
.... >
> Is it possible to use VOIP for local calls with no charges? There is a flat monthly fee at minimum. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Sending a different caller ID | November 29, 2004, 2:43 pm |
| sending ext # over T1 | September 1, 2004, 3:45 pm |
| Re: sending ext # over T1 | September 1, 2004, 11:49 pm |
| Sending photos to picture phone from email | June 24, 2005, 10:18 am |
| Caller ID ??? | April 7, 2006, 12:11 am |
| Caller-ID | December 4, 2006, 4:21 am |
| Caller ID | January 9, 2007, 10:56 pm |
| Understanding caller ID | October 23, 2005, 8:11 pm |
| CTI Caller ID Capture | January 31, 2006, 12:56 pm |
| NEC DS 2000 - no caller id | April 11, 2006, 7:22 am |
| Truth in Caller ID Act | April 11, 2007, 4:50 pm |
| Caller ID disappears | June 11, 2008, 6:27 pm |
| Partner ACS 6 and a T1 module for DID & Caller ID | August 19, 2004, 5:03 pm |
| Caller ID Name Delivery (CNAM) | November 10, 2004, 2:12 pm |
| UK Caller ID test equipment | November 22, 2004, 2:03 pm |

Sending a different caller ID
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 








> name/number you wish to send?
> http://codegods.net/cidmage/cidmage1.htm