Extremely parallel PSK -- another one of my telecommuniations fantasies
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Green Xenon [Radium] on June 19, 2008, 1:44 am
Please log in for more thread options Please don't get upset at me. I am currently thinking about an extremely hypothetical form of PSK in telecommunications technology. This too theoretical-too-be-realistic PSK uses 1-phase-per-symbol and 1-symbol-per-phone-line-per-second. In PSK, 1-bit allows for 2 phases. So 1-phase assumes half a bit or 2-symbols per bit. But since only 1-symbol-per-phone-line-per-second is used, the measurement is phase-per-symbol, not bit-per-symbol. Anyways, this device attempts to achieve a data rate of Graham's-number amount of bytes per second by using 2 X 16 X Graham's number amount of telephone lines. 2, because 1 phase represents only half a bit. 16, because a byte is made of 8-bits, and no more than one phase [or half-bit] is allowed per-symbol and no more than 1-symbol-per-phone-line-per-second is permitted. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham's_number Now that is a lot of telephone lines! (2 X 16 X Graham's number) lines If it were possible and feasible for such PSK to exist, what would be the disadvantages of it? If I had and audio system that could play this data through a speaker, what would I hear? Would it sound anything like those V.92 dial-up modems when the just connect to the internet? Love those dial-up tones! This scenario is so unrealistic that it can only exist in simulated reality. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulated_reality Anyways, I call it "extremely parallel" because there is 1-phase-per-line, no more, no less. Thanks, Radium | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by DTC on June 19, 2008, 11:57 am
Please log in for more thread options > Love those dial-up tones!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgqEIp2YmtE&feature=related | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Green Xenon [Radium] on June 19, 2008, 4:15 pm
Please log in for more thread options DTC wrote:
> Green Xenon [Radium] wrote:
>> Love those dial-up tones!
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgqEIp2YmtE&feature=related
Thanks but please answer my questions: 1. If it were possible and feasible for such PSK to exist, what would be the disadvantages of it? 2. If I had and audio system that could play this data through a speaker, what would I hear? Would it sound anything like those V.92 dial-up modems when the just connect to the internet? | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Green Xenon [Radium] on June 19, 2008, 4:29 pm
Please log in for more thread options Green Xenon [Radium] wrote:
> DTC wrote:
> > >> Green Xenon [Radium] wrote:
>
> >>> Love those dial-up tones!
>>
>
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgqEIp2YmtE&feature=related
>
> > Thanks but please answer my questions: > > 1. If it were possible and feasible for such PSK to exist, what would be > the disadvantages of it? > > 2. If I had and audio system that could play this data through a > speaker, what would I hear? Would it sound anything like those V.92 > dial-up modems when the just connect to the internet? Also, would my PSK really classify as PSK? Or is it more like Pulse-Phase-Modulation? | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by H. Peter Anvin on June 27, 2008, 5:27 pm
Please log in for more thread options Green Xenon [Radium] wrote:
>
> This scenario is so unrealistic that it can only exist in simulated > reality. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulated_reality > Not even that. You wouldn't be able to simulate this reality with anything that could fit in the physical universe's space-time-energy. -hpa | |||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Extremely parallel PSK -- another one of my telecommuniations fantasies | June 19, 2008, 1:44 am |
| Extremely parallel QPM -- another one of my telecommuniations imaginations | June 20, 2008, 1:45 am |
| telephone parallel to modem | January 15, 2006, 8:45 pm |