Re: The Coming Tug of War Over the Internet -- Wash Post

The old line telecom providers have always relied on a tiered-service

> pricing model: relatively cheap basic services, such as local POTS > "lifeline" service, subsidized by higher-priced and higher-profit > premium offerings.

State commissions required this pricing. And they still do. Their premise is that POTS should be as low as possible since by far the largest part of the population in their state is made up of residence users and also because of the desire to promote "universal service."

Even where telcos wanted to change the pricing model, such as by reducing or eliminating the pricing disparity between interstate and intrastate calls (intrastate calls being priced high, usually a good deal higher) commissions consistently refused to go along, since this would require raising POTS prices.

Although the amounts of the subsidies vary, the basic > premise has always been that business users pay more because they get > more utility from phones and because the network is designed to meet > business service levels, and that premium residential offerings, such as > call waiting, are also priced at high-profit margins.

Business users are far outnumbered by residence users, and whether state commissioners are elected or appointed, they still ultimately have to represent and respond to popular sentiment.

Besides that, the premise that business users get more utility from telephone service is generally true.

Wes Leatherock snipped-for-privacy@aol.com snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com

Reply to
Wesrock
Loading thread data ...

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.