Re: Cost of POTS w/o Long Distance

Brief summary follows. Location, SBC, former Ameritech, specifically

> Chicago. Incident involved intrastate local toll rather than > interstate LD. I had switched interstate LD carriers, and during the > transaction, without my knowledge, local toll carrier on one of my two > lines apparently was listed as unassigned, as you speculate. ...

A common problem. Telephone providers, both local and long distance, have to spend time and money resolving such issues. Sometimes the dollar amounts are significant and the dispute makes the newspapers. It's tough to say who is at fault -- customer, base telephone provider, or long distance carrier, or combination.

We all have to pay for this through higher rates and aggravation.

I noticed some respondents said this was a reason they're switching to VOIP, but I it seems most VOIP are keeping one POTS line as a backup. I suspect getting VOIP to reach that "last mile" of service reliability to equal or exceed classic POTS will take some time in coming and be considerably expensive. (Can VOIP handle faxes transparently?) As an example, the 911 requirement was repeatedly extended; that was something the VOIP people should've had all set up and included from day one. In other words, down the road VOIP will cost much more than it does now.

Reply to
hancock4
Loading thread data ...

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.