AT&T wants you to have cheaper cable [telecom]

So called cord cutting, the term for going without pay-TV, is a real threat to pay-TV providers. Experian Marketing Services has found that the trend is not only real, but accelerating: The report said the percentage of U.S. households without pay-TV jumped from 4.5% in 2010 to 6.5% last year.

Pay-TV providers have gotten the memo; after originally resisting any changes, these providers are slowly adjusting to this new paradigm. The latest company to acknowledge the current model is unsustainable is AT&T. A recent deal of $39 per month for broadband Internet, basic channels, Amazon.com Prime, and Time Warner's HBO appears to be an implicit admission that providers need to present better value to compete with Hulu- and Netflix-only households.

Rest at:

formatting link

-or-

formatting link

Bill

Reply to
Bill Horne
Loading thread data ...

[snip]

The article states: "A recent deal of $39 per month for broadband Internet, basic channels, Amazon.com Prime, and Time Warner's HBO ..." but it doesn't state what those "basic channels" are. I'd like to know: re any local broadcast stations are included?

If not, that would explain AT&T's ability to offer the service at a lower retail price than franchised cable TV companies can offer.

Of course the subscriber would have to figure out some other way to obtain broadcast signals. Such as rabbit-ears or a rooftop antenna.

Neal McLain aka texascableguy

Reply to
Neal McLain

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.