1. Home
  2. Electronic Security in UK
  3. 36. Yes i confirm Wireless unreliability since 2001

36. Yes i confirm Wireless unreliability since 2001

I have on several occasions attempted to explain these things to you. All that happens is that you end up not understanding what's going on and through your ignorance you end up ranting. A week or so later you post again saying that no-one has explained these things to you. If you have such a problem understanding wireless systems why don't you contact a manufacturer directly?.

If you really want to learn about wireless technology in alarm systems why don't you ask a proper question here on this newsgroup. You never know, someone might educate you. I haven't given up hope yet but I must admit that when you constantly post lies on top of lies it doesn't help. You are not subjective.

I can explain how. If you ask me I will tell you how it works. You only have to ask... nicely!.

In all my time reading your posts I cannot remember seeing any technical supported arguments with reference to RFI jamming detection. Show me some. And in reference to the above, I will give you whatever technical arguments you want. Don't rant. Just ask.

Just so that I know, what type of 'smoke curtains' are you talking about. Please give me an example.

Bad english here but I think what you're after is How is a high level of background RFI detected. Is this what you are getting at?. If so all you need to do is contact a manufacturer & they'll probably tell you. I can tell you if you like. Just ask. It's actually very simple so maybie you could understand it.

Older systems maybie. Newer systems... ah! smell the roses. RFI jamming detection in all its glory. Want to know how it works?. Ask away.

Reply to
Roger
Loading thread data ...

I post on a regular basis since 2001 that wireless alarm systems are unreliable during Radio Frequency Interferences (RFI).

Since that time, several professional specialists (they call themselves like that but I don't see why in view of theyre knowledge) have mentioned that the new systems avoid RFI but they are unable to explain how. Other pro's (?) say that RFI is detected but they can't explain how. It doesn't exist that marvelous/imaginative wireless alarm system.

Instead of analyzing the problem and submitting it to they're "product manufacturers" for eventual support, no, pro's wanted to "handle" it themselves, they're uses a more in theyre reach technique, they attempt to block my post, email en Internet access, they insult and more... Pro's don't like what I say... Pro's are unable to counter-argue with technical supported arguments.

Instead of looking to the real problem RFI causes, pro's try to hide reality, they raise unjustified smoke curtains in an attempt to generate uncertainty, fear in order to put my statements in doubt.

Business and financial interests obliges...

All attempts failed and convince me even more that I have to inform the new readers...

The problem of RFI on wireless alarm systems is to serious to be neglected and not mentioned to the purchasers.

All REAL PROFESSIONALS in the wireless data communication business know that RFI problem, "low level electricians" in the alarm installer/seller business don't.

WHY do Manufacturers not counter-argue by publishing the most basic data subject theyre wireless data communication loop quality (RFI avoidance means???, RFI detection means???, receiver quality data???).

WHY? Theyre system have elementary receivers with a large band pass (SAW filter type band pass), low outside band pass rejection, low intermodulation quality, etc.. cost obliges.. theyre wireless alarm systems are RFI sensitive, NO RFI selective warning, they know it but don't like to publish it.

I will continue posting in order to inform the new readers because I cant admit so called pro's (?) stupidity that don't admit that there is a inherent Radio data communication problem with wireless alarm systems.. Wireless signals can be detected and disrupted from the outside.

So called pro's in that alarm business obviously don't possess the meager intellectual capacity required to understand the basic concepts of wireless data exchange principles. Don't overestimate theyre talent to judge others either.

Paul

Reply to
-pull

After 4 years of endless dribble, we can safely say that Paul's brain is still not immune to RFI. It's time to take the headphones off Paul. Maybe one of us "PROS" can send you a tin foil lined hat to block all the unwanted RFI.

Yes Paul, there is a life beyond RFI...

Jim Rojas

Reply to
Jim Rojas

Paul,

The only person you are impressing with your anti-wireless rhetoric is yourself. It's a shame you don't put all this energy into something worthwhile--something that would benefit society. Perhaps you ought to work for the United Nation, or for one of their more popular NGOs. That would be an organization that works like, and acts like yourself. You'd feel right at home there old top!

Reply to
securitymission

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.