Politics Aside- stoopid headline

Have a question or want to start a discussion? Post it! No Registration Necessary.  Now with pictures!

Threaded View
If the first sentence/paragraph in a story is:

"Despite numerous congressional investigations into the attack on the  
American consulate in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11, 2012, we still  
don?t know the whole story."

Then the headline shouldn't be:

"What Really Happened in Benghazi on 9/11/2012"

At least, not without a question mark...

Is it me, or are headlines becoming less and less descriptive of the  
story they herald in favor of enticing folks to click the link?


Re: Politics Aside- stoopid headline
On 9/7/2014 10:30 AM, JoeRaisin wrote:
Quoted text here. Click to load it

Oops, wrong forum... and forgot the link too!

Double fuck up.

I usually only do that while hand programming a DSC Power Series panel...


Re: Politics Aside- stoopid headline
On Sunday, September 7, 2014 12:37:14 PM UTC-4, JoeRaisin wrote:
Quoted text here. Click to load it



It doesn't matter anyway.

The headline should probably read

"Guess who's STILL trying to cover who's ass over the Benghazi attack?"

I can't imagine why Obomba along with all of his other non-constitutional e
xecutive decision he hasn't made a presidential decree that everyone should
 stop talking about Benghazi anyway. Because he's never going to actually a
llow any blame to be put on anyone who's in the favor of the present admini
stration ....

If he can protect Eric Holder from being subpoenaed to a congressional hear
ing for being responsible for giving guns to Mexican gun runners that wound
 up killing a US boarder guard and dozens of Mexican police official, what  
makes anyone think that he'll ever give up any of his other cronies for Ben
ghazi?

Besides, he's got everyone hoodwinked it believing that he's stopped trying
 to take money from the money earners and give it to all the illegal immigr
ants while he raises the minimum wage. Uhhhhh..... isn't that taking the mo
ney from the money earners and giving it to the people who don't? Well, sin
ce he certainly doesn't have any credentials that qualify him to be preside
nt you have to hand it too him for building up the number of people that wi
ll vote for the next Santa Claus.  

Give a man a fish and he eats today. Teach a man how to fish and he can fee
d himself.  

Give a man free food, clothing, education, medical and .......  ummmm and h
e'll vote for you or your party in the next election.

Re: Politics Aside- stoopid headline
Quoted text here. Click to load it

You know I think I finally figure out how to express my outrage.  I spent my  
first 12 years or so as a contractor working overtime so I could afford to  
pay the guys for the time the spent not getting jobs done.  I didn't make  
much.  The guys working for me took home more than I did.  Finally I gave up  
and fired everybody.  For the last decade (almost) I have only taken the  
work I could do by myself, and I have made money, bought toys, and  
stimulated the economy.  Now I am being told I have to pay for all those  
assholes I fired anyway.








  


Re: Politics Aside- stoopid headline
Bob La Londe Wrote:  


Quoted text here. Click to load it


Then don't hire illegal aliens!  <g>



--  

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety,
 deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Ben Franklin

Re: Politics Aside- stoopid headline
Quoted text here. Click to load it

I had proper I-9 documentation on everybody who ever worked for me.  The  
best technician I ever had was a Mexican with a work visa.  He works for the  
county now doing all the things I trained him to do.

  


Re: Politics Aside- stoopid headline
take only CASH   keep what you want and report the rest...     ;-)






Quoted text here. Click to load it

You know I think I finally figure out how to express my outrage.  I spent my
first 12 years or so as a contractor working overtime so I could afford to
pay the guys for the time the spent not getting jobs done.  I didn't make
much.  The guys working for me took home more than I did.  Finally I gave up
and fired everybody.  For the last decade (almost) I have only taken the
work I could do by myself, and I have made money, bought toys, and
stimulated the economy.  Now I am being told I have to pay for all those
assholes I fired anyway.










---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com


Re: Politics Aside- stoopid headline
On Sunday, September 7, 2014 11:58:47 PM UTC-4, Bob La Londe wrote:
Quoted text here. Click to load it


It's been about 20 years for me and I've found the same results. I work a lot of hours but they are all productive versus when I had people work for me. Only when absolutely necessary, I hire someone for a day or two to help me pull wires in a bigger job.

The secret is .... control your annual income by the amount of cash you take. Buys a lot of toys! It's amazing how I manage to survive on a very meager income :-)  


Site Timeline