Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Information on April 21, 2005, 6:09 pm
Please log in for more thread options Hello, I have an option61c I tried to config an i2002 phone on the system. The network is fine. I've put the right values (ip card address, gateway and mask). I've checked the licenses, and it's fine too. However, I do not manage to make the i2002 work. I did not have any problem with the i2004. any cues will be appreciated. thanks | ||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Pennyman on April 22, 2005, 12:18 am
Please log in for more thread options Can you be more specific what does not work. Programming the set, register the set or what else ? Pennyman | ||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| ip 2002 configuration | April 21, 2005, 6:09 pm |
| Nortel 2002 VOIP phone reset | July 4, 2008, 8:44 pm |
| Removing/Adding an extension to Nortel IP Phone 2002 | April 21, 2008, 3:59 pm |
| BCM Unified Messaging on Windows XP & Outlook 2002 - outbox issue | May 3, 2005, 11:04 pm |
| nortel bts configuration | March 30, 2005, 11:43 pm |
| OTM 2.2 configuration issue? | February 23, 2006, 10:35 am |
| QoS service Configuration | April 7, 2006, 11:31 am |
| IP Phone Configuration | September 27, 2006, 10:40 pm |
| ACD printer configuration | November 14, 2005, 7:43 am |
| Baystack 470 QoS Configuration | January 23, 2007, 10:16 am |
| Simple 802.1Q Trunk Configuration | May 5, 2005, 2:02 pm |
| Baystack ARN Configuration Question | May 31, 2005, 10:21 pm |
| Alteon AD4 configuration problem | September 21, 2005, 3:38 pm |
| Routing configuration for name display | January 20, 2006, 12:18 pm |
| Hunt Group Configuration | March 6, 2006, 5:53 pm |

ip 2002 configuration
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 


>
> I have an option61c
>
> I tried to config an i2002 phone on the system. The network is fine. I've
> put the right values (ip card address, gateway and mask). I've checked the
> licenses, and it's fine too. However, I do not manage to make the i2002
> work. I did not have any problem with the i2004.
>
> any cues will be appreciated.
>
> thanks
>
>