Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Posted by pgartner on September 27, 2007, 7:51 pm
Please log in for more thread options employees in the feild to use the i2050 softphone on thier laptop I have setup rules on my firewall to allow ports 7000, 28000-28255, 51000-51200 to point to the BCM's internal interface The SW connects, we can dial out, and they can hear the caller, but the caller can hear the softphone users I'm thought maybe i'm missing a port, so i opened everything for a test, same results. i tried the laptop on the lan (reconfig to point to the internal [private] IP) and it works fine is NAT causing me problems? anybody have any ideas? Paul | |||||||||||||
|
Posted by Someone on September 28, 2007, 6:14 pm
Please log in for more thread options setup in the signaling headers. | |||||||||||||
|
Posted by John on October 3, 2007, 11:26 am
Please log in for more thread options I had similar issues and had to turn on tunnel to tunnel access on our
Contivity specifically I think it was End user to End User. Tunnel to Tunnel Traffic Allow End User to End User Allow End User to Branch Office Allow Branch Office to Branch Office Is there a similar setting on your jupiter firewall? > Most likely. VoIP will have addressing and port information used in the
> call setup in the signaling headers. >> I'm trying to configure my Juniper firewall to allow some of our
>> employees in the feild to use the i2050 softphone on thier laptop >> >> I have setup rules on my firewall to allow ports 7000, 28000-28255, >> 51000-51200 to point to the BCM's internal interface >> >> The SW connects, we can dial out, and they can hear the caller, but >> the caller can hear the softphone users >> >> I'm thought maybe i'm missing a port, so i opened everything for a >> test, same results. >> >> i tried the laptop on the lan (reconfig to point to the internal >> [private] IP) and it works fine >> >> is NAT causing me problems? >> >> anybody have any ideas? >> >> >> Paul >> >
> | |||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| i2050 softphone accessing BCM behind NATing firewall | September 27, 2007, 7:51 pm |
| Accessing Bcm50 through Bsr222 Question | October 13, 2008, 2:12 pm |
| new softphone | April 24, 2007, 1:06 am |
| new softphone | April 24, 2007, 1:07 am |
| softphone | April 24, 2007, 1:09 am |
| Uploading BCM 3.7 patches through a firewall | July 26, 2007, 10:28 pm |
| 2050 softphone | August 24, 2005, 12:31 pm |
| ip2050 softphone | September 7, 2005, 3:33 pm |
| Another Softphone Question... | April 18, 2006, 11:39 am |
| Re: Call Pilot 4 & Windows Firewall | May 12, 2007, 4:33 am |
| Nortel Switched Firewall: snmp | September 16, 2007, 8:22 am |
| voip distance nortel softphone | August 3, 2005, 11:52 am |
| I2050 | June 4, 2005, 9:04 am |
| i2050 Clients | June 2, 2005, 5:11 pm |
| Can't connect i2050 via VPN | July 11, 2006, 4:26 pm |

i2050 softphone accessing BCM behind NATing firewall
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 





> employees in the feild to use the i2050 softphone on thier laptop
>
> I have setup rules on my firewall to allow ports 7000, 28000-28255,
> 51000-51200 to point to the BCM's internal interface
>
> The SW connects, we can dial out, and they can hear the caller, but
> the caller can hear the softphone users
>
> I'm thought maybe i'm missing a port, so i opened everything for a
> test, same results.
>
> i tried the laptop on the lan (reconfig to point to the internal
> [private] IP) and it works fine
>
> is NAT causing me problems?
>
> anybody have any ideas?
>
>
> Paul
>