Nortel BLN Router T1 Load Balancing?
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Posted by Networkrs on January 10, 2006, 1:26 pm
Please log in for more thread options Scenario: Core Site: BLN with 5280 Sync module Two Separate dedicated T1 circuits to the remote site Remote Site: ARN with Tri-Serial I would like to load share / load balance across both of these point to point T1 circuits. Is this possible? and if so how? | |||||||||||||
|
Posted by MC on January 14, 2006, 1:17 pm
Please log in for more thread options For point to point circuits I use PPP in a multilink PPP bundle. For Frame, Nortel uses FRF.15 End-to-End Multilink Frame Relay, bundles at the PVC level. The Multi-link standards are primarily FRF.15 and FRF.16, but correct operation also involves FRF.5, FRF.8, and FRF.12. FRF.15 takes an 'end-to-end' approach to Multi-Link Frame Relay. The aggregate VC can be composed of multiple VCs taking divergent paths across different Frame Relay switches. This approach is more complex to implement and must make additional provisions for frames to be resequenced at the destination. Correct implementation includes use of the FRF.12 frame fragmentation standard, which may limit the ability of fragments to leave the Frame Relay environment and be carried over other services such as ATM. ( Note - Cisco does not currently have FRF.15-based devices, they do support the FRF.16 standard) http://www.frforum.com/5000/5000index.html | |||||||||||||
>
> Scenario:
>
> Core Site:
> BLN with 5280 Sync module
> Two Separate dedicated T1 circuits to the remote site
>
> Remote Site:
> ARN with Tri-Serial
>
> I would like to load share / load balance across both of these point to
> point T1 circuits.
>
> Is this possible? and if so how?
>