Configuring vlans on the 470 switches
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Ron on February 28, 2007, 10:28 pm
Please log in for more thread options I have a stack of 4 470, 48 port switches setup as one big unit. I have given it an ip address and am able to access the web interface through the network. I also have a core, that I am plugged into from this switch, this core has all of our vlans on it. I know with the 480 switches you can assign vlans up to the port level, but lets say I want the first switch to be one vlan, second to be another vlan, third to be another vlan, etc.... I see where you select the ports and assign a vlan to them but shouldnt the vlans be there since I am plugged into the core? What I did was in the gui interface assighned switch 3 in the stack to my 192.168.1.x vlan, but if I plug something in there, I get the address that the switch is assigned, in that range, so the switch has 172.16.17.10 and I get an address of 172.16.17.25 I dont get the vlan of 192 I assigned. Anyone know how I can make these switches actually see all the vlans that my core has? I've created new vlans in the gui... | ||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by flamer die.spam@hotmail.com on March 1, 2007, 5:27 pm
Please log in for more thread options no.. I don't fully know what your trying to achieve, if you want to have vlans spanning multiple switches you need to enable dot1q trunking between the switches, on the nortel you do this: 'vlan ports 26 tagging enable filter-untagged-frame disable priority 0' which sets port 26 to trunk vlans, you still need to add the vlans though: vlan create 101 name "101" type port vlan create 102 name "102" type port then assign ports to the vlan: vlan members 101 1-26 (which sticks ports 1-26 in vlan 101) don't forget to configure your routing correctly or your hosts on vlans wont get out of the vlan. Flamer. | ||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Dophi on March 8, 2007, 12:37 am
Please log in for more thread options > Hello all...any help would be greatly appricated.
> > I have a stack of 4 470, 48 port switches setup as one big unit. I > have given it an ip address and am able to access the web interface > through the network. > > I also have a core, that I am plugged into from this switch, this > core has all of our vlans on it. > > I know with the 480 switches you can assign vlans up to the port > level, but lets say I want the first switch to be one vlan, second to > be another vlan, third to be another vlan, etc.... > > I see where you select the ports and assign a vlan to them but > shouldnt the vlans be there since I am plugged into the core? What I > did was in the gui interface assighned switch 3 in the stack to my > 192.168.1.x vlan, but if I plug something in there, I get the address > that the switch is assigned, in that range, so the switch has > 172.16.17.10 and I get an address of 172.16.17.25 I dont get the > vlan of 192 I assigned. > > Anyone know how I can make these switches actually see all the vlans > that my core has? I've created new vlans in the gui... For example, there are 3 switches in a stack. Switch 1 = S1 = VLAN 10 = Management VLAN Switch 2 = S2 = VLAN 20 Switch 3 = S3 = VLAN 30 port 1/48 connects to core switch. 1. Create VLAN 10, 20, and 30 first and assign port members into VLAN. 2. Setup VLAN 10 as the management VLAN so you can use IP address of VLAN 10 (172.16.17.x ) to access this stack 3. Change port 1/48 as a trunk port and assign it into every VLAN's. 4. Change the port on core switch connected to 470 as a trunk port ( 802.1q) and enable DHCP relay on the interface. I guess this is what you want. | ||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Configuring vlans on the 470 switches | February 28, 2007, 10:28 pm |
| Configuring 802.3ad between 8600 and Cisco switches. | May 31, 2005, 10:21 pm |
| Routing between VLANs on a baystack 450-24T | September 7, 2005, 9:14 am |
| ERS 8600, simple setup, IP, VLANs, etc. | June 10, 2007, 3:21 pm |
| Configuring mlt and vlan | April 29, 2005, 4:33 am |
| Configuring 802.3ad LACP | January 17, 2006, 5:23 pm |
| Configuring Succession 4.5 for IP Phone 2004 using LD 97 & LD 11 | June 16, 2005, 11:47 am |
| Configuring Nortel IP Phone 2004 | June 19, 2006, 3:24 pm |
| Configuring Passport 1200 (Accelar) IP Routes help | June 19, 2006, 5:51 pm |
| 470-48T switches can I do this? | April 1, 2007, 12:39 am |
| baystack 425 switches | July 15, 2005, 7:30 pm |
| Multineting on ERS switches | December 10, 2006, 1:07 pm |
| Appletalk and 470-48T switches ?? | June 25, 2007, 7:02 pm |
| Connecting Passport 8600 to Cisco Switches | June 7, 2005, 8:21 am |
| Any Nortel Edge Switches With Private VLAN Features? | September 24, 2006, 2:55 pm |
>
> I have a stack of 4 470, 48 port switches setup as one big unit. I
> have given it an ip address and am able to access the web interface
> through the network.
>
> I also have a core, that I am plugged into from this switch, this
> core has all of our vlans on it.
>
> I know with the 480 switches you can assign vlans up to the port
> level, but lets say I want the first switch to be one vlan, second to
> be another vlan, third to be another vlan, etc....
>
> I see where you select the ports and assign a vlan to them but
> shouldnt the vlans be there since I am plugged into the core?