Aries or Taurus sets better?
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by on April 27, 2005, 11:05 pm
Please log in for more thread options Hi Gang -- I have a new installation coming up and am seriously considering getting Aries sets used rather than the new 3900 sets (Taurus). This is from my noticing that users in other locations just prefer the older sets: they're easier to use. Is this true or is it just that old habits die hard? I'm wondering if anyone has had similar experiences with user set preference. Thanks much for any feedback. Alex Kasper | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by John on April 28, 2005, 2:10 am
Please log in for more thread options Aries John 807 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by PaulDS on April 28, 2005, 7:27 pm
Please log in for more thread options
From my experience the 390x series are a lot easier. Self labelling menus etc. The users I have swaped over are more than happy. PD_S > Hi Gang --
> > I have a new installation coming up and am seriously considering > getting Aries sets used rather than the new 3900 sets (Taurus). > > This is from my noticing that users in other locations just prefer the > older sets: they're easier to use. > > Is this true or is it just that old habits die hard? > > I'm wondering if anyone has had similar experiences with user set > preference. > > Thanks much for any feedback. > > Alex Kasper > | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Anders Larsen on July 5, 2005, 4:49 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Hi. My experience is that it is a matter of old habits when users complain about the new 39XX set. Earlier we have been using analog sets and a few 3310 and 3820 (Orion serie) I must admit that I liked the Orion serie a lot better than the Taurus but i guess that it is a matter of time to get used to the new set. Anders Larsen Denmark > Hi Gang --
> > I have a new installation coming up and am seriously considering > getting Aries sets used rather than the new 3900 sets (Taurus). > > This is from my noticing that users in other locations just prefer the > older sets: they're easier to use. > > Is this true or is it just that old habits die hard? > > I'm wondering if anyone has had similar experiences with user set > preference. > > Thanks much for any feedback. > > Alex Kasper > | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by acewarlock on July 9, 2005, 1:51 pm
Please log in for more thread options I prefer 2616 w/display, in fact i'm using a 3904 but i'm switch my
phone to a 2616 next week | |||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Aries or Taurus sets better? | April 27, 2005, 11:05 pm |
| BCM-50 & I2004 IP Sets | March 31, 2008, 11:43 am |
| Page through sets on 11c? | June 14, 2008, 10:59 am |
| Possible to page through sets on an Option 11? | April 27, 2005, 11:11 pm |
| Anyone having a problem with Norstar T-series sets? | May 4, 2005, 12:57 pm |
| Printing sets by TGAR on Option 11? | March 16, 2005, 12:10 pm |
| FA: Norstar 8x24 DR5 w Startalk 2.1 & 3 Sets | February 14, 2006, 7:09 pm |
| 2216, 2 AOMs, changed sets, and now they don't work. | February 22, 2006, 1:26 pm |
| MICS 7.0 detects new T7208 phones as M7208 sets | March 28, 2007, 1:14 pm |
>
> I have a new installation coming up and am seriously considering
> getting Aries sets used rather than the new 3900 sets (Taurus).
>
> This is from my noticing that users in other locations just prefer the
> older sets: they're easier to use.
>
> Is this true or is it just that old habits die hard?
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has had similar experiences with user set
> preference.
>
> Thanks much for any feedback.
>
> Alex Kasper
>