Home Theater Re: 1080p over component video standard proposed to the CEA

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: 1080p over component video standard proposed to the CEA David Matthew Wood 08-19-07
Posted by David Matthew Wood on August 19, 2007, 1:41 pm
Please log in for more thread options



> phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
>
> > | Further, why is "HD Freak" cross posting all of these posts to the
> > | alt.video.vcr newsgroup?
> >
> > Perhaps because he thinks 1080p60 component video matters to VCR
> > enthusiasts.
>
> I know of no stand-alone VCRs that even have component video inputs. And
> computer software might be of interest to VCR enthusiasts, too, but that
> doesn't mean that posts of that subject should be crossposted here.
>
> You didn't notice the plural form "posts" was used? If so, what do
> MediaMax HD Server, ZeroWire, or Panasonic's latest monitor offerings
> have to do with VCRs?

Most of our VCRs at work have component video inputs, but this doesn't
change things of course ;)

Posted by UCLAN on August 19, 2007, 2:02 pm
Please log in for more thread options


David Matthew Wood wrote:

>>I know of no stand-alone VCRs that even have component video inputs. And
>>computer software might be of interest to VCR enthusiasts, too, but that
>>doesn't mean that posts of that subject should be crossposted here.
>>
>>You didn't notice the plural form "posts" was used? If so, what do
>>MediaMax HD Server, ZeroWire, or Panasonic's latest monitor offerings
>>have to do with VCRs?
>
> Most of our VCRs at work have component video inputs, but this doesn't
> change things of course ;)

Consumer VCRs, not professional VCRs. ;)

Posted by G-squared on August 19, 2007, 2:12 pm
Please log in for more thread options


> David Matthew Wood wrote:
> >>I know of no stand-alone VCRs that even have component video inputs. And
> >>computer software might be of interest to VCR enthusiasts, too, but that
> >>doesn't mean that posts of that subject should be crossposted here.
>
> >>You didn't notice the plural form "posts" was used? If so, what do
> >>MediaMax HD Server, ZeroWire, or Panasonic's latest monitor offerings
> >>have to do with VCRs?
>
> > Most of our VCRs at work have component video inputs, but this doesn't
> > change things of course ;)
>
> Consumer VCRs, not professional VCRs. ;)

Apparently you're not familiar with Digital Betacam and Betacam SP.

GG


Posted by Morph on August 19, 2007, 2:27 pm
Please log in for more thread options


G-squared wrote:

>>>>I know of no stand-alone VCRs that even have component video inputs. And
>>>>computer software might be of interest to VCR enthusiasts, too, but that
>>>>doesn't mean that posts of that subject should be crossposted here.
>>
>>>>You didn't notice the plural form "posts" was used? If so, what do
>>>>MediaMax HD Server, ZeroWire, or Panasonic's latest monitor offerings
>>>>have to do with VCRs?
>>
>>>Most of our VCRs at work have component video inputs, but this doesn't
>>>change things of course ;)
>>
>>Consumer VCRs, not professional VCRs. ;)
>
> Apparently you're not familiar with Digital Betacam and Betacam SP.

Those are consumer VCRs? News to me...

--
And did you exchange a walk-on part in the war
for a lead role in a cage?

Posted by on August 19, 2007, 8:57 pm
Please log in for more thread options


|> David Matthew Wood wrote:
|> >>I know of no stand-alone VCRs that even have component video inputs. And
|> >>computer software might be of interest to VCR enthusiasts, too, but that
|> >>doesn't mean that posts of that subject should be crossposted here.
|>
|> >>You didn't notice the plural form "posts" was used? If so, what do
|> >>MediaMax HD Server, ZeroWire, or Panasonic's latest monitor offerings
|> >>have to do with VCRs?
|>
|> > Most of our VCRs at work have component video inputs, but this doesn't
|> > change things of course ;)
|>
|> Consumer VCRs, not professional VCRs. ;)
|
| Apparently you're not familiar with Digital Betacam and Betacam SP.

MLM might claim I didn't do any research (I didn't in this case), but I
would call these as definitely professional equipment.

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2007-08-19-1956@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

Similar ThreadsPosted
Re: 1080p over component video standard proposed to the CEA August 18, 2007, 9:20 am
Re: 1080p over component video standard proposed to the CEA August 19, 2007, 1:41 pm
VCR video gets pumpy when it gets converted to component video? September 27, 2005, 2:49 pm
component video cables January 17, 2006, 8:25 pm
Component video - system selectors November 17, 2005, 9:45 am
Firewire vs. Component Video Connections December 31, 2005, 9:38 am
Component Video and Digital Audio Switch? March 24, 2005, 4:24 am
FA: Less than 4 Days Left- Complete Monster Cable Setup W/ Component Video!! $34.97! January 21, 2006, 8:57 am
The Rise and Fall of Component Cables. Component vs. HDMI September 13, 2006, 8:02 pm
1080p January 2, 2006, 7:19 pm
1080p 720p - noob September 10, 2006, 9:40 pm
The DVDO iScan VP50 now supports 1080p-24 July 22, 2007, 8:45 am
Cant Get Video!!!!Please Help December 14, 2005, 8:17 pm
Is component Y Y-B Y-R the same as component Y Pb Pr? December 14, 2005, 11:19 pm
video projection over wireless February 19, 2005, 5:38 am