Home Theater Pioneer, Panasonic or LCD

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Pioneer, Panasonic or LCD ramyrizkalla@gmail.com 11-11-05
Posted by ramyrizkalla@gmail.com on November 11, 2005, 7:18 am
Please log in for more thread options


I am in the market for a 40-45 inch diplay. Popular opinion at most of

the high end home theater stores is that the Pioneer Elite 930 is the
way to go; especially for movies. I was nearly convinced until I
finally saw it side by side with a Panasonic TH-42PX500U. To my eye,
the Panasonic actually looks better and costs about $1500 less. I am
talking about out-of-th-box on both. I'm sure both could look better
when adjusted. The reviews in popular magazines on both are good. Any

thoughts?


On a different note, I also looked into the 45 inch Sharp Aquios LCD.
It can display 1080 unlike the plasma. I thought the higher resolution

was great but the picture looked a bit more artificial and two
dimentional. In the end I thought I'd rather watch a 720 plasma than a

1080 LCD. I was also a little turned off by the reports of LCD's
inability to handle fast motion as well as a plasma. What do others
think?



Posted by Tony Hwang on November 12, 2005, 2:13 am
Please log in for more thread options


ramyrizkalla@gmail.com wrote:
> I am in the market for a 40-45 inch diplay. Popular opinion at most of
>
> the high end home theater stores is that the Pioneer Elite 930 is the
> way to go; especially for movies. I was nearly convinced until I
> finally saw it side by side with a Panasonic TH-42PX500U. To my eye,
> the Panasonic actually looks better and costs about $1500 less. I am
> talking about out-of-th-box on both. I'm sure both could look better
> when adjusted. The reviews in popular magazines on both are good. Any
>
> thoughts?
>
>
> On a different note, I also looked into the 45 inch Sharp Aquios LCD.
> It can display 1080 unlike the plasma. I thought the higher resolution
>
> was great but the picture looked a bit more artificial and two
> dimentional. In the end I thought I'd rather watch a 720 plasma than a
>
> 1080 LCD. I was also a little turned off by the reports of LCD's
> inability to handle fast motion as well as a plasma. What do others
> think?
>
Hi,
Not considering price, Plasma has an upper edge for the time being on
picture quality(as well as what you mentioned). But LCD will catch up
soon. If you are buying now, Plasma, if you can wait a year or so, then
I'd go for LCD. Currently I have Panasonic Plasma sets. Next will be LCD
for sure. Plasma consumes more power compared to same size LCD.
Tony


Similar ThreadsPosted
Pioneer, Panasonic or LCD November 11, 2005, 7:18 am
panasonic warranty info January 7, 2005, 3:00 am
Panasonic PT53WX42 & Computer March 16, 2006, 11:17 pm
FS: Panasonic 500/300/200 projector (700?) ceiling mount August 13, 2005, 4:25 am
New Panasonic TH-50PX60 -- Is This Issue A Problem? October 8, 2006, 7:29 pm
panasonic xr25 - will 2 rear speakers work? April 3, 2006, 11:41 pm
Please Help - Major Convergence problem with Panasonic 53X54 September 12, 2006, 12:41 pm
FA: PANASONIC PT-AE1000U HD LCD home theater projector May 25, 2008, 11:15 am
Pioneer 588A November 7, 2005, 10:05 am
FS Pioneer Elite CLD-99 November 13, 2006, 8:17 pm
Pioneer MCACC July 19, 2007, 11:24 pm
FS: Pioneer HLD-X9 Laserdisc Player! November 16, 2007, 3:25 pm
FS: Pioneer HLD-X9 Laserdisc Player! December 3, 2007, 12:48 pm
Last Day! FS: Pioneer HLD-X9 Laserdisc Player! January 17, 2008, 1:37 am
FA: Pioneer CLD-99 Elite Laserdisc/CD Player January 28, 2005, 12:49 am