|
Posted by Don Young on May 24, 2008, 9:40 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> Ulysses wrote:
>> I've only seem them in old movies and perhaps at an antique store but
>> it seems like wringer washing machines would use much less power than a
>> convential machine. I'm guessing they fill up with the available water
>> pressure, use gravity to drain, and the electric motor is only used to
>> agitate the clothes.
>
> Unless you get a really old one, the motor also powered one or both of
> the rollers in the wringer. The original wringer set-up had a crank.
>
>> Anyone actually used one? Are they a PITA to wring out the water?
>
> Have used. They're a pain in the hand when you get your fingers caught.
> Most wringers have a quick release, but I recall just reversing the feed
> till my hand was free. Feeding the clothes through the wringer isn't a
> big deal - it just requires that you participate in the process (and pay
> attention) rather than starting a cycle and going off to do something
> else.
>
>> Anyone know how much power they use? A servo to automatically fill and
>> drain the tank would be nice and should use little power.
>
> I'm guessing a 1/2 hp. Probably you won't need a servo to push in the
> drain plug and pull it out again. Some had spigot-like drain valves. If
> the clothes weren't really filthy, you could wash another load in the
> same soapy water, then do multiple rinses.
>
> FWIW, I doubt they use much less power (and I'm certain they use a lot
> more water) than recent designs. The spin cycle of more modern machines
> makes a big difference in the amount of human work needed.
>
> There's even a (Japanese/Korean?) machine that has no agitator and
> doesn't need detergent for normal soiling.
>
> --
> Morris Dovey
> DeSoto Solar
> DeSoto, Iowa USA
> http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
The simplest drain system was a drain hose with a hook fitting on the end.
You let the lose hang down to drain and hooked the end over the top rim of
the tub to stop draining.
Don Young
|