General Home Automation X10 Control Question

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
X10 Control Question hi ho 03-29-05
Posted by hi ho on March 29, 2005, 8:36 am
Please log in for more thread options


I have an automation controller that can control powerline X10 devices by
connecting a Power Line Interface (PL513 or TW523) with a supplied cable
with RJ11 connectors on each end that plug between my automation controller
and powerline interface module.

Now the query, what serial communication protocol is used between the PL513
and my automation controller. Reason is that I do not really want to
control using the powerline option due to reliability issues - rather
connect say a Rain8 X10 device (that is normally connected to the powerline
via TW523 like my automation controller) directly by cable to my automation
controller. Indeed can you daisy chain say two Rain8 or more X10 devices
(with different X10 addresses) on a single cable like you can RS485 serial.

BTW - the Rain8 is a device that provides 8 analogue switched outputs under
X10 control for sprinkler control. It seems logical to my mind that you
should be able to directly connect the automation controller and the Rain8 -
as both use the Powerline Interface Modules to communicate via the power
line carriier.

Hope some expert in X10 can help.




Posted by hi ho on March 29, 2005, 8:46 am
Please log in for more thread options


Further to my post - the rain8 is meant to work with an XM-10 power line
interface, I think my controller uses a TW523 Powerline interface. I also
note mention of a CM11 interface. I hope this extra info helps. As an X10
newby, what is the difference between a CM11, a cM12, a PL513 and TW 523
powerline interfaces ?

Thanks in anticipation

> I have an automation controller that can control powerline X10 devices by
> connecting a Power Line Interface (PL513 or TW523) with a supplied cable
> with RJ11 connectors on each end that plug between my automation
controller
> and powerline interface module.
>
> Now the query, what serial communication protocol is used between the
PL513
> and my automation controller. Reason is that I do not really want to
> control using the powerline option due to reliability issues - rather
> connect say a Rain8 X10 device (that is normally connected to the
powerline
> via TW523 like my automation controller) directly by cable to my
automation
> controller. Indeed can you daisy chain say two Rain8 or more X10 devices
> (with different X10 addresses) on a single cable like you can RS485
serial.
>
> BTW - the Rain8 is a device that provides 8 analogue switched outputs
under
> X10 control for sprinkler control. It seems logical to my mind that you
> should be able to directly connect the automation controller and the
Rain8 -
> as both use the Powerline Interface Modules to communicate via the power
> line carriier.
>
> Hope some expert in X10 can help.
>
>




Posted by tparent on March 29, 2005, 3:21 pm
Please log in for more thread options


CM11 is a two ways ASCII to powerline interface and has the ability to
execute in "stand-alone" (without being connected to a PC) stored
macro.
For me CM12 is a synonym of CM11 (but should be confirmed by true
guru).

PL513 is a one way powerline interface (sending).
This interface has no "logic" inside. It means that he is unable to
convert one protocol to an other or store and execute macro like the
previous one.
At least, three wires are required. Ground, Zero detection which
provide a pulse when the 0V point is detectect on the 110V sine curve,
and TX, which pulse an X10 "bit" (5V) when TX is high.
All these cable are insulated from the powerline through optocoupler.
As you guess, trying to program the correct "pulse" sequence to send
X10 command (in binary) could be a hard work and is not (at my point of
view) suitable for communicating between PC-MAC programs and powerline
but more dedicate to interface your own electronic (like PIC
controller) with PLC.

TW523 is a two ways version of the PL513 (means could act as recevier
and sender).

Just for info, CM11 implement something looking like a "collision
detection" protocol, which increase the overall reliability of X10.
TW523 does not and seems to be unable to provide this functionality to
the upper application layer).

Hope it helps

Thierry

hi ho wrote:
> Further to my post - the rain8 is meant to work with an XM-10 power
line
> interface, I think my controller uses a TW523 Powerline interface. I
also
> note mention of a CM11 interface. I hope this extra info helps. As
an X10
> newby, what is the difference between a CM11, a cM12, a PL513 and TW
523
> powerline interfaces ?
>
> Thanks in anticipation
>
> > I have an automation controller that can control powerline X10
devices by
> > connecting a Power Line Interface (PL513 or TW523) with a supplied
cable
> > with RJ11 connectors on each end that plug between my automation
> controller
> > and powerline interface module.
> >
> > Now the query, what serial communication protocol is used between
the
> PL513
> > and my automation controller. Reason is that I do not really want
to
> > control using the powerline option due to reliability issues -
rather
> > connect say a Rain8 X10 device (that is normally connected to the
> powerline
> > via TW523 like my automation controller) directly by cable to my
> automation
> > controller. Indeed can you daisy chain say two Rain8 or more X10
devices
> > (with different X10 addresses) on a single cable like you can RS485
> serial.
> >
> > BTW - the Rain8 is a device that provides 8 analogue switched
outputs
> under
> > X10 control for sprinkler control. It seems logical to my mind
that you
> > should be able to directly connect the automation controller and
the
> Rain8 -
> > as both use the Powerline Interface Modules to communicate via the
power
> > line carriier.
> >
> > Hope some expert in X10 can help.
> >
> >



Posted by Paul Peard on March 30, 2005, 12:40 am
Please log in for more thread options



> CM11 is a two ways ASCII to powerline interface and has the ability to
> execute in "stand-alone" (without being connected to a PC) stored
> macro.
> For me CM12 is a synonym of CM11 (but should be confirmed by true
> guru).
>
> PL513 is a one way powerline interface (sending).
> This interface has no "logic" inside. It means that he is unable to
> convert one protocol to an other or store and execute macro like the
> previous one.
> At least, three wires are required. Ground, Zero detection which
> provide a pulse when the 0V point is detectect on the 110V sine curve,
> and TX, which pulse an X10 "bit" (5V) when TX is high.
> All these cable are insulated from the powerline through optocoupler.
> As you guess, trying to program the correct "pulse" sequence to send
> X10 command (in binary) could be a hard work and is not (at my point of
> view) suitable for communicating between PC-MAC programs and powerline
> but more dedicate to interface your own electronic (like PIC
> controller) with PLC.
>
> TW523 is a two ways version of the PL513 (means could act as recevier
> and sender).
>
> Just for info, CM11 implement something looking like a "collision
> detection" protocol, which increase the overall reliability of X10.
> TW523 does not and seems to be unable to provide this functionality to
> the upper application layer).
>
> Hope it helps
>
> Thierry
>
> hi ho wrote:
>> Further to my post - the rain8 is meant to work with an XM-10 power
> line
>> interface, I think my controller uses a TW523 Powerline interface. I
> also
>> note mention of a CM11 interface. I hope this extra info helps. As
> an X10
>> newby, what is the difference between a CM11, a cM12, a PL513 and TW
> 523
>> powerline interfaces ?
>>
>> Thanks in anticipation
>>
>> > I have an automation controller that can control powerline X10
> devices by
>> > connecting a Power Line Interface (PL513 or TW523) with a supplied
> cable
>> > with RJ11 connectors on each end that plug between my automation
>> controller
>> > and powerline interface module.
>> >
>> > Now the query, what serial communication protocol is used between
> the
>> PL513
>> > and my automation controller. Reason is that I do not really want
> to
>> > control using the powerline option due to reliability issues -
> rather
>> > connect say a Rain8 X10 device (that is normally connected to the
>> powerline
>> > via TW523 like my automation controller) directly by cable to my
>> automation
>> > controller. Indeed can you daisy chain say two Rain8 or more X10
> devices
>> > (with different X10 addresses) on a single cable like you can RS485
>> serial.
>> >
>> > BTW - the Rain8 is a device that provides 8 analogue switched
> outputs
>> under
>> > X10 control for sprinkler control. It seems logical to my mind
> that you
>> > should be able to directly connect the automation controller and
> the
>> Rain8 -
>> > as both use the Powerline Interface Modules to communicate via the
> power
>> > line carriier.
>> >
>> > Hope some expert in X10 can help.
>> >
>> >
>




Posted by Paul Peard on March 30, 2005, 12:42 am
Please log in for more thread options


I think CM12 is "European" CM11 - at least that's what I have read.

Paul
> CM11 is a two ways ASCII to powerline interface and has the ability to
> execute in "stand-alone" (without being connected to a PC) stored
> macro.
> For me CM12 is a synonym of CM11 (but should be confirmed by true
> guru).
>
> PL513 is a one way powerline interface (sending).
> This interface has no "logic" inside. It means that he is unable to
> convert one protocol to an other or store and execute macro like the
> previous one.
> At least, three wires are required. Ground, Zero detection which
> provide a pulse when the 0V point is detectect on the 110V sine curve,
> and TX, which pulse an X10 "bit" (5V) when TX is high.
> All these cable are insulated from the powerline through optocoupler.
> As you guess, trying to program the correct "pulse" sequence to send
> X10 command (in binary) could be a hard work and is not (at my point of
> view) suitable for communicating between PC-MAC programs and powerline
> but more dedicate to interface your own electronic (like PIC
> controller) with PLC.
>
> TW523 is a two ways version of the PL513 (means could act as recevier
> and sender).
>
> Just for info, CM11 implement something looking like a "collision
> detection" protocol, which increase the overall reliability of X10.
> TW523 does not and seems to be unable to provide this functionality to
> the upper application layer).
>
> Hope it helps
>
> Thierry
>
> hi ho wrote:
>> Further to my post - the rain8 is meant to work with an XM-10 power
> line
>> interface, I think my controller uses a TW523 Powerline interface. I
> also
>> note mention of a CM11 interface. I hope this extra info helps. As
> an X10
>> newby, what is the difference between a CM11, a cM12, a PL513 and TW
> 523
>> powerline interfaces ?
>>
>> Thanks in anticipation
>>
>> > I have an automation controller that can control powerline X10
> devices by
>> > connecting a Power Line Interface (PL513 or TW523) with a supplied
> cable
>> > with RJ11 connectors on each end that plug between my automation
>> controller
>> > and powerline interface module.
>> >
>> > Now the query, what serial communication protocol is used between
> the
>> PL513
>> > and my automation controller. Reason is that I do not really want
> to
>> > control using the powerline option due to reliability issues -
> rather
>> > connect say a Rain8 X10 device (that is normally connected to the
>> powerline
>> > via TW523 like my automation controller) directly by cable to my
>> automation
>> > controller. Indeed can you daisy chain say two Rain8 or more X10
> devices
>> > (with different X10 addresses) on a single cable like you can RS485
>> serial.
>> >
>> > BTW - the Rain8 is a device that provides 8 analogue switched
> outputs
>> under
>> > X10 control for sprinkler control. It seems logical to my mind
> that you
>> > should be able to directly connect the automation controller and
> the
>> Rain8 -
>> > as both use the Powerline Interface Modules to communicate via the
> power
>> > line carriier.
>> >
>> > Hope some expert in X10 can help.
>> >
>> >
>




Similar ThreadsPosted
X10 Control Question March 29, 2005, 8:36 am
Newbe question. Is it possible to control IR devices with a newer laptop? April 28, 2005, 7:53 pm
X10 how to control a lamp module question - gradual light increase December 5, 2005, 6:32 pm
FS: JP1 cable to program your universial remote control, now youcan control anything you want! July 14, 2005, 10:46 pm
Control my PC with a remote control via a USB IR ? October 18, 2006, 2:23 pm
question October 24, 2005, 11:59 am
HI Im New and have a question April 25, 2006, 3:00 pm
Question of the day September 28, 2006, 11:12 pm
X10 Camera question February 9, 2005, 4:58 pm
Relays Question February 17, 2005, 4:56 am
HomeSeer Question March 30, 2005, 12:20 am
Question about this product June 9, 2005, 9:44 pm
General X10 question August 29, 2005, 5:27 pm
Illiterate X-10 Question October 25, 2005, 6:39 pm
Insteon question November 20, 2005, 12:32 pm