Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by hi ho on March 29, 2005, 8:36 am
Please log in for more thread options I have an automation controller that can control powerline X10 devices by connecting a Power Line Interface (PL513 or TW523) with a supplied cable with RJ11 connectors on each end that plug between my automation controller and powerline interface module. Now the query, what serial communication protocol is used between the PL513 and my automation controller. Reason is that I do not really want to control using the powerline option due to reliability issues - rather connect say a Rain8 X10 device (that is normally connected to the powerline via TW523 like my automation controller) directly by cable to my automation controller. Indeed can you daisy chain say two Rain8 or more X10 devices (with different X10 addresses) on a single cable like you can RS485 serial. BTW - the Rain8 is a device that provides 8 analogue switched outputs under X10 control for sprinkler control. It seems logical to my mind that you should be able to directly connect the automation controller and the Rain8 - as both use the Powerline Interface Modules to communicate via the power line carriier. Hope some expert in X10 can help. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by hi ho on March 29, 2005, 8:46 am
Please log in for more thread options Further to my post - the rain8 is meant to work with an XM-10 power line interface, I think my controller uses a TW523 Powerline interface. I also note mention of a CM11 interface. I hope this extra info helps. As an X10 newby, what is the difference between a CM11, a cM12, a PL513 and TW 523 powerline interfaces ? Thanks in anticipation > and powerline interface module.
PL513
> > Now the query, what serial communication protocol is used between the > and my automation controller. Reason is that I do not really want to
powerline
> control using the powerline option due to reliability issues - rather > connect say a Rain8 X10 device (that is normally connected to the > via TW523 like my automation controller) directly by cable to my
automation
> controller. Indeed can you daisy chain say two Rain8 or more X10 devices
serial.
> (with different X10 addresses) on a single cable like you can RS485 >
under
> BTW - the Rain8 is a device that provides 8 analogue switched outputs > X10 control for sprinkler control. It seems logical to my mind that you
Rain8 -
> should be able to directly connect the automation controller and the > as both use the Powerline Interface Modules to communicate via the power
> line carriier. > > Hope some expert in X10 can help. > > | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by tparent on March 29, 2005, 3:21 pm
Please log in for more thread options
CM11 is a two ways ASCII to powerline interface and has the ability to execute in "stand-alone" (without being connected to a PC) stored macro. For me CM12 is a synonym of CM11 (but should be confirmed by true guru). PL513 is a one way powerline interface (sending). This interface has no "logic" inside. It means that he is unable to convert one protocol to an other or store and execute macro like the previous one. At least, three wires are required. Ground, Zero detection which provide a pulse when the 0V point is detectect on the 110V sine curve, and TX, which pulse an X10 "bit" (5V) when TX is high. All these cable are insulated from the powerline through optocoupler. As you guess, trying to program the correct "pulse" sequence to send X10 command (in binary) could be a hard work and is not (at my point of view) suitable for communicating between PC-MAC programs and powerline but more dedicate to interface your own electronic (like PIC controller) with PLC. TW523 is a two ways version of the PL513 (means could act as recevier and sender). Just for info, CM11 implement something looking like a "collision detection" protocol, which increase the overall reliability of X10. TW523 does not and seems to be unable to provide this functionality to the upper application layer). Hope it helps Thierry hi ho wrote: > Further to my post - the rain8 is meant to work with an XM-10 power
line
> interface, I think my controller uses a TW523 Powerline interface. I
also
> note mention of a CM11 interface. I hope this extra info helps. As
an X10
> newby, what is the difference between a CM11, a cM12, a PL513 and TW
523
> powerline interfaces ?
> > Thanks in anticipation > > > I have an automation controller that can control powerline X10
devices by
> > connecting a Power Line Interface (PL513 or TW523) with a supplied
cable
> > with RJ11 connectors on each end that plug between my automation
> controller
> > and powerline interface module.
the
> > > > Now the query, what serial communication protocol is used between > PL513
> > and my automation controller. Reason is that I do not really want
to
> > control using the powerline option due to reliability issues -
rather
> > connect say a Rain8 X10 device (that is normally connected to the
> powerline
> > via TW523 like my automation controller) directly by cable to my
> automation
> > controller. Indeed can you daisy chain say two Rain8 or more X10
devices
> > (with different X10 addresses) on a single cable like you can RS485
> serial.
> >
outputs
> > BTW - the Rain8 is a device that provides 8 analogue switched > under
> > X10 control for sprinkler control. It seems logical to my mind
that you
> > should be able to directly connect the automation controller and
the
> Rain8 -
> > as both use the Powerline Interface Modules to communicate via the
power
> > line carriier.
> > > > Hope some expert in X10 can help. > > > > | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Paul Peard on March 30, 2005, 12:40 am
Please log in for more thread options
> CM11 is a two ways ASCII to powerline interface and has the ability to
> execute in "stand-alone" (without being connected to a PC) stored > macro. > For me CM12 is a synonym of CM11 (but should be confirmed by true > guru). > > PL513 is a one way powerline interface (sending). > This interface has no "logic" inside. It means that he is unable to > convert one protocol to an other or store and execute macro like the > previous one. > At least, three wires are required. Ground, Zero detection which > provide a pulse when the 0V point is detectect on the 110V sine curve, > and TX, which pulse an X10 "bit" (5V) when TX is high. > All these cable are insulated from the powerline through optocoupler. > As you guess, trying to program the correct "pulse" sequence to send > X10 command (in binary) could be a hard work and is not (at my point of > view) suitable for communicating between PC-MAC programs and powerline > but more dedicate to interface your own electronic (like PIC > controller) with PLC. > > TW523 is a two ways version of the PL513 (means could act as recevier > and sender). > > Just for info, CM11 implement something looking like a "collision > detection" protocol, which increase the overall reliability of X10. > TW523 does not and seems to be unable to provide this functionality to > the upper application layer). > > Hope it helps > > Thierry > > hi ho wrote: >> Further to my post - the rain8 is meant to work with an XM-10 power
> line
>> interface, I think my controller uses a TW523 Powerline interface. I
> also
>> note mention of a CM11 interface. I hope this extra info helps. As
> an X10
>> newby, what is the difference between a CM11, a cM12, a PL513 and TW
> 523
>> powerline interfaces ?
>> >> Thanks in anticipation >> >> > I have an automation controller that can control powerline X10
> devices by
>> > connecting a Power Line Interface (PL513 or TW523) with a supplied
> cable
>> > with RJ11 connectors on each end that plug between my automation
>> controller
>> > and powerline interface module.
>> > >> > Now the query, what serial communication protocol is used between > the
>> PL513
>> > and my automation controller. Reason is that I do not really want
> to
>> > control using the powerline option due to reliability issues -
> rather
>> > connect say a Rain8 X10 device (that is normally connected to the
>> powerline
>> > via TW523 like my automation controller) directly by cable to my
>> automation
>> > controller. Indeed can you daisy chain say two Rain8 or more X10
> devices
>> > (with different X10 addresses) on a single cable like you can RS485
>> serial.
>> >
>> > BTW - the Rain8 is a device that provides 8 analogue switched > outputs
>> under
>> > X10 control for sprinkler control. It seems logical to my mind
> that you
>> > should be able to directly connect the automation controller and
> the
>> Rain8 -
>> > as both use the Powerline Interface Modules to communicate via the
> power
>> > line carriier.
>> > >> > Hope some expert in X10 can help. >> > >> > >
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Paul Peard on March 30, 2005, 12:42 am
Please log in for more thread options
I think CM12 is "European" CM11 - at least that's what I have read. Paul > CM11 is a two ways ASCII to powerline interface and has the ability to
> execute in "stand-alone" (without being connected to a PC) stored > macro. > For me CM12 is a synonym of CM11 (but should be confirmed by true > guru). > > PL513 is a one way powerline interface (sending). > This interface has no "logic" inside. It means that he is unable to > convert one protocol to an other or store and execute macro like the > previous one. > At least, three wires are required. Ground, Zero detection which > provide a pulse when the 0V point is detectect on the 110V sine curve, > and TX, which pulse an X10 "bit" (5V) when TX is high. > All these cable are insulated from the powerline through optocoupler. > As you guess, trying to program the correct "pulse" sequence to send > X10 command (in binary) could be a hard work and is not (at my point of > view) suitable for communicating between PC-MAC programs and powerline > but more dedicate to interface your own electronic (like PIC > controller) with PLC. > > TW523 is a two ways version of the PL513 (means could act as recevier > and sender). > > Just for info, CM11 implement something looking like a "collision > detection" protocol, which increase the overall reliability of X10. > TW523 does not and seems to be unable to provide this functionality to > the upper application layer). > > Hope it helps > > Thierry > > hi ho wrote: >> Further to my post - the rain8 is meant to work with an XM-10 power
> line
>> interface, I think my controller uses a TW523 Powerline interface. I
> also
>> note mention of a CM11 interface. I hope this extra info helps. As
> an X10
>> newby, what is the difference between a CM11, a cM12, a PL513 and TW
> 523
>> powerline interfaces ?
>> >> Thanks in anticipation >> >> > I have an automation controller that can control powerline X10
> devices by
>> > connecting a Power Line Interface (PL513 or TW523) with a supplied
> cable
>> > with RJ11 connectors on each end that plug between my automation
>> controller
>> > and powerline interface module.
>> > >> > Now the query, what serial communication protocol is used between > the
>> PL513
>> > and my automation controller. Reason is that I do not really want
> to
>> > control using the powerline option due to reliability issues -
> rather
>> > connect say a Rain8 X10 device (that is normally connected to the
>> powerline
>> > via TW523 like my automation controller) directly by cable to my
>> automation
>> > controller. Indeed can you daisy chain say two Rain8 or more X10
> devices
>> > (with different X10 addresses) on a single cable like you can RS485
>> serial.
>> >
>> > BTW - the Rain8 is a device that provides 8 analogue switched > outputs
>> under
>> > X10 control for sprinkler control. It seems logical to my mind
> that you
>> > should be able to directly connect the automation controller and
> the
>> Rain8 -
>> > as both use the Powerline Interface Modules to communicate via the
> power
>> > line carriier.
>> > >> > Hope some expert in X10 can help. >> > >> > >
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| X10 Control Question | March 29, 2005, 8:36 am |
| Newbe question. Is it possible to control IR devices with a newer laptop? | April 28, 2005, 7:53 pm |
| X10 how to control a lamp module question - gradual light increase | December 5, 2005, 6:32 pm |
| FS: JP1 cable to program your universial remote control, now youcan control anything you want! | July 14, 2005, 10:46 pm |
| Control my PC with a remote control via a USB IR ? | October 18, 2006, 2:23 pm |
| question | October 24, 2005, 11:59 am |
| HI Im New and have a question | April 25, 2006, 3:00 pm |
| Question of the day | September 28, 2006, 11:12 pm |
| X10 Camera question | February 9, 2005, 4:58 pm |
| Relays Question | February 17, 2005, 4:56 am |
| HomeSeer Question | March 30, 2005, 12:20 am |
| Question about this product | June 9, 2005, 9:44 pm |
| General X10 question | August 29, 2005, 5:27 pm |
| Illiterate X-10 Question | October 25, 2005, 6:39 pm |
| Insteon question | November 20, 2005, 12:32 pm |

X10 Control Question
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 






> connecting a Power Line Interface (PL513 or TW523) with a supplied cable
> with RJ11 connectors on each end that plug between my automation