General Home Automation Re: Induction Cook top - Any X10 interference?

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: Induction Cook top - Any X10 interference? Bill Kearney 08-23-07
Posted by Bill Kearney on August 23, 2007, 10:28 am
Please log in for more thread options

> Always liked the idea of these as a more efficient and safer way to
> cook.

Eh, cooking on them is nowhere near as good as gas. Heat control for sauces
and such just doesn't work as well. At least not from my experience trying
to use them.


Posted by Robert L Bass on August 23, 2007, 10:39 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> I don't follow any of the cooking newsgroups...

Of course, now that you mentioned their existence I just "subscribed" to a
couple to see what kind of info is around. Thanks.

--

Regards,
Robert L Bass

=============================>
Bass Home Electronics
941-925-8650
4883 Fallcrest Circle
Sarasota · Florida · 34233
http://www.bassburglaralarms.com
=============================>


Posted by ClamRake on August 24, 2007, 6:38 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Robert L Bass
>
>I haven't tried an induction range so I can't comment on that. Do those
require specialized cookware or would my stainless stuff
>work?

The inductive stove tops require a magnetically susceptible pans &
pots. So steel works fine, cast iron works grreat. Aluminum won't
work. Neither will copper. But I think there were some Aluminum
pots and pans with steel bottom inserts that can be used.

As for your stainless steel, it depends on the quality of the
stainless. If it is the harder less corrosion resistant "martensitic"
stainless, then it is somewhat magnetic and will be heated by the
induction stove top's magnetic fields.

But if the cookware is the "better" corrosion resistant grade
"Austenitic" stainless, it is non-magnetic and will not work with the
induction stove top.

You can use a refridgerator magnet to do your testing.

hths

ClamRake



Posted by Robert L Bass on August 24, 2007, 10:20 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> Robert L Bass
>>
>>I haven't tried an induction range so I can't comment on that. Do those
require specialized cookware or would my stainless stuff
>>work?
>
> The inductive stove tops require a magnetically susceptible pans &
> pots. So steel works fine, cast iron works grreat. Aluminum won't
> work. Neither will copper. But I think there were some Aluminum
> pots and pans with steel bottom inserts that can be used.

I don't use aluminum cookware.

> As for your stainless steel, it depends on the quality of the
> stainless. If it is the harder less corrosion resistant "martensitic"
> stainless, then it is somewhat magnetic and will be heated by the
> induction stove top's magnetic fields.
>
> But if the cookware is the "better" corrosion resistant grade
> "Austenitic" stainless, it is non-magnetic and will not work with the
> induction stove top.
>
> You can use a refridgerator magnet to do your testing.

Thanks. That's interesting information. I always assumed that SS was
magnetic. Checking my major cookware, magnets don't stick to any of
it. :(

In this area almost everything is electric. I hate using an electric range.
In fact, I cook for most major events on the gas grill. It has the double
advantage of better control and not heating up the kitchen. The
disadvantage is I have to make periodic trips to replace the cylinder.
I've been kicking around the idea of installing a gas auxiliary heater for
the pool. That will require an in-ground propane tank and some tubing.
If we do it I'll probably switch the single kitchen stove and range for a
gas side-by-side oven and range.

I'm curious, though. Do you feel that the level of control with an induction
range equals gas? Besides less gunk in the air, are there other
advantages to induction cooking?

--

Regards,
Robert L Bass

=============================>
Bass Home Electronics
941-925-8650
4883 Fallcrest Circle
Sarasota · Florida · 34233
http://www.bassburglaralarms.com
=============================>


Posted by B Fuhrmann on August 25, 2007, 10:54 am
Please log in for more thread options
>> As for your stainless steel, it depends on the quality of the
>> stainless. If it is the harder less corrosion resistant "martensitic"
>> stainless, then it is somewhat magnetic and will be heated by the
>> induction stove top's magnetic fields.
>>
>> But if the cookware is the "better" corrosion resistant grade
>> "Austenitic" stainless, it is non-magnetic and will not work with the
>> induction stove top.

Ikea's 365+ series is austenitic but has other steel and aluminum in the
base which makes it useable with induction stoves.
www.ikea.com/us/en/catalog/products/00101160
From what I've seen, induction cook tops are more common in Europe.

> Thanks. That's interesting information. I always assumed that SS was
> magnetic. Checking my major cookware, magnets don't stick to any of
> it. :(

Most people don't realize that stainless can have different magnetic
properties than most other steels. Of those that do, many think that all
stainless is not magnetic.

> I'm curious, though. Do you feel that the level of control with an
> induction
> range equals gas? Besides less gunk in the air, are there other
> advantages to induction cooking?

The bottom of the pan heats more evenly.
Mine is an old (15+ years) and only has 10 power levels (one burner is
higher power than the others) but the lack of total control hasn't been a
problem.



Similar ThreadsPosted
Re: Induction Cook top - Any X10 interference? August 23, 2007, 10:28 am
X-10 Antenna Interference... June 2, 2005, 2:39 am
Radio Interference July 3, 2006, 9:06 pm
Insteon - watch out for RF interference June 10, 2005, 4:09 pm
Line Noise Interference Question July 1, 2005, 2:10 pm
Preventing Random X-10 Code interference... July 20, 2005, 12:19 pm
X10 Interference from the Cellet Cellphone Charger September 28, 2007, 7:26 pm
The Season for needing Surge Protectors and Interference Filters is upon us April 8, 2005, 2:38 pm