General Home Automation MR16 LEDs for Landscape Lights

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
MR16 LEDs for Landscape Lights Jeff Volp 06-22-08
Posted by Jeff Volp on June 22, 2008, 11:27 pm
Please log in for more thread options
In a quest to become even more energy efficient, I am looking at replacing
the 20W halogens in our landscape lights with MR16 LEDs. While the LEDs are
incredibly expensive compared with halogens, payback through energy savings
should be achievable in several years. Searching the web I found relatively
little information regarding how well these units actually work in real
applications. So, I thought I would see if anyone here would have some
comments.

I have several concerns. First, it appears that output and life are
negatively impacted by temperature. Since these outdoor fixtures are pretty
much sealed except for a drain hole, conduction cooling for the higher
wattage LEDs will be a problem. That caused me to rule out several of the
higher output units. The design of the fixture requires a wide-angle lamp.
One of the best candidates so far is this one:

http://www.ledwholesalers.com/store/index.php?act=viewProd&productId=322

I have also been looking at the kind that have 36 to 48 individual LEDs.
However, the dispersion angle isn't as wide, and they don't seem to be as
bright.

Does anyone here have any experience with these units?

Jeff



Posted by Robert Green on June 23, 2008, 2:04 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> In a quest to become even more energy efficient, I am looking at replacing
> the 20W halogens in our landscape lights with MR16 LEDs. While the LEDs
are
> incredibly expensive compared with halogens, payback through energy
savings
> should be achievable in several years. Searching the web I found
relatively
> little information regarding how well these units actually work in real
> applications. So, I thought I would see if anyone here would have some
> comments.
>
> I have several concerns. First, it appears that output and life are
> negatively impacted by temperature. Since these outdoor fixtures are
pretty
> much sealed except for a drain hole, conduction cooling for the higher
> wattage LEDs will be a problem. That caused me to rule out several of the
> higher output units. The design of the fixture requires a wide-angle
lamp.
> One of the best candidates so far is this one:
>
> http://www.ledwholesalers.com/store/index.php?act=viewProd&productId=322
>
> I have also been looking at the kind that have 36 to 48 individual LEDs.
> However, the dispersion angle isn't as wide, and they don't seem to be as
> bright.
>
> Does anyone here have any experience with these units?

No personally, but there are a number of threads on Usenet. Here's one:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.engr.lighting/browse_thread/thread/ad4f81
26dd61f234/ffde892eaa0cb6c5?hl=en&lnk=st&q=MR16+LEDs#ffde892eaa0cb6c5

aka: http://tinyurl.com/3ntcqf

No seems to think highly of their light output as in: "while normal MR16
light output graphs will show the lux or fc levels at 1m (3 feet) through
20m (60 feet) or that sort of scale, some of these are measured out to just
25 centimetres, less than a foot, in some cases."

--
Bobby G.




Posted by Jeff Volp on June 23, 2008, 5:08 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>
>> Does anyone here have any experience with these units?
>
> No personally, but there are a number of threads on Usenet. Here's one:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.engr.lighting/browse_thread/thread/ad4f81
> 26dd61f234/ffde892eaa0cb6c5?hl=en&lnk=st&q=MR16+LEDs#ffde892eaa0cb6c5
>
> aka: http://tinyurl.com/3ntcqf
>
> No seems to think highly of their light output as in: "while normal MR16
> light output graphs will show the lux or fc levels at 1m (3 feet) through
> 20m (60 feet) or that sort of scale, some of these are measured out to
> just
> 25 centimetres, less than a foot, in some cases."

Yes, I did my share of Googling. I read that one, and another that claimed
the photons didn't have enough pressure behind them because of the low
wattage, so they slowed down. OK...

These seem to be getting better all the time. I'm going to pick up several
different samples to see how well they compare with the halogens for
landscape lighting.

Jeff



Posted by Robert Green on June 24, 2008, 4:10 pm
Please log in for more thread options

(crossposted from comp.home.automation)

> >> Does anyone here have any experience with these units?
> >
> > No personally, but there are a number of threads on Usenet. Here's one:
> >
> >
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.engr.lighting/browse_thread/thread/ad4f81
> > 26dd61f234/ffde892eaa0cb6c5?hl=en&lnk=st&q=MR16+LEDs#ffde892eaa0cb6c5
> >
> > aka: http://tinyurl.com/3ntcqf
> >
> > No seems to think highly of their light output as in: "while normal MR16
> > light output graphs will show the lux or fc levels at 1m (3 feet)
through
> > 20m (60 feet) or that sort of scale, some of these are measured out to
> > just
> > 25 centimetres, less than a foot, in some cases."
>
> Yes, I did my share of Googling. I read that one, and another that
claimed
> the photons didn't have enough pressure behind them because of the low
> wattage, so they slowed down. OK...

Yes - there was some levity in that thread. I assume that gentlemen was
trying to explain the difference between nearly point sources of light like
LEDs versus much larger sources. Photometry is more than a little confusing
because there are so many ways to measure it: talbots, candelas, nits,
lumens, foot-lamberts, foot-candles, etc.

Did you post in the lighting newsgroup? I looked but I didn't see anything
so I crossposted this for you. (-:

> These seem to be getting better all the time. I'm going to pick up
several
> different samples to see how well they compare with the halogens for
> landscape lighting.

That would have been my next suggestion. From what I am reading, they've
got a ways to go but for landscaping their "short throw" might not be such a
liability. In your 120F degree end of the world, I'd also want to do some
serious testing, like what happens if a bulb ends up running accidentally
when it's full summer daylight shining on them for 8 hours at well over
100F.

--
Bobby G.




Posted by Jeff Volp on June 24, 2008, 8:02 pm
Please log in for more thread options

>> These seem to be getting better all the time. I'm going to pick up
>> several different samples to see how well they compare with the
>> halogens for landscape lighting.

> That would have been my next suggestion. From what I am reading, they've
> got a ways to go but for landscaping their "short throw" might not be such
> a
> liability. In your 120F degree end of the world, I'd also want to do some
> serious testing, like what happens if a bulb ends up running accidentally
> when it's full summer daylight shining on them for 8 hours at well over
> 100F.

That's a good point. It would probably cause rapid deterioration, and it is
something I will have to protect against. Since they are under X10 control,
it is easy to have the Ocelot watch for a daytime ON, and just switch them
back OFF after a few seconds - leaving them on just long enough for testing.

Jeff



Similar ThreadsPosted
MR16 LEDs for Landscape Lights June 22, 2008, 11:27 pm
Halogen Bulbs mr16 November 19, 2005, 7:14 pm
Halogen Bulbs mr16 November 19, 2005, 7:17 pm
Automated lawnmower using rate gyro, RS485 and Infrared leds December 25, 2007, 1:38 pm
Landscape Lighting Controller November 8, 2005, 5:09 pm
LED's for landscape (cont) July 7, 2008, 12:07 pm
X10 and LED lights December 4, 2005, 4:48 pm
Lights flickering August 30, 2005, 5:41 pm
Keeping lights off at night March 3, 2005, 11:49 pm
LED Lights and other automation protocols April 5, 2005, 8:13 pm
Re: X10 with Compact Fluorescent Lights (fwd) July 13, 2005, 12:10 am
caution is needed with lights! December 8, 2005, 2:02 pm
dimmer lights for house February 12, 2006, 7:10 am
Controling Holiday Lights October 15, 2006, 9:37 pm
Random X10 all lights on/all units off over and over December 9, 2006, 12:05 am