General Home Automation Dissecting CFLs

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Dissecting CFLs Robert Green 06-03-07
---> Re: Dissecting CFLs Andrew Gabriel06-03-07
Posted by Robert Green on June 3, 2007, 9:49 am
Please log in for more thread options
I've got three different dead CFL's that I want to cut apart so that I can
examine the circuitry and to see what component emitted the thick smoke
cloud when the GE bulb failed.

I was thinking of making a jig from a 2 by 4 scraps with two v's cut so that
I could rotate the base of the bulb around against a 1/2" Dremel cutoff
wheel at a fixed distance, sort of like a can opener.

The N-vision bulb that failed appears to have had a manufacturing defect -
the plastic hole where the tube exits was chipped. That may have
contributed to its early failure. Unlike the GE bulb, it did not emit any
smoke when it failed. The ends of the bulb darkened, but it died free of
smoke stink. I don't know about anyone else's SO, but mine can smell a lit
cigarette in a car a mile ahead of us on the highway so burning bulbs is a
really bad thing.

Has anyone cut open a CFL before? Any pointers?

--
Bobby G.




Posted by Dave Houston on June 3, 2007, 12:40 pm
Please log in for more thread options

>I was thinking of making a jig from a 2 by 4 scraps with two v's cut so that
>I could rotate the base of the bulb around against a 1/2" Dremel cutoff
>wheel at a fixed distance, sort of like a can opener.

Are you insane? Cutting them open will void the warranty. ;-)

AP has another coal story this morning.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/G/GLOBAL_WARMING_STATES?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2007-06-02-12-45-20

Instead of forcing CFLs down people's throats, I think we should just ban
air conditioning. It uses a larger share of electricity than lighting so its
banning would go a lot further towards saving the earth. Of course, that
might create social conflict if folks follow my other suggestion that to
avoid the need for cleaning shower walls one should just avoid showers.

Posted by Robert L Bass on June 3, 2007, 1:08 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> Instead of forcing CFLs down people's throats,
> I think we should just ban air conditioning.

There's a better solution. Build a tunnel from
Alaska to Florida and ship the cold air down
here.

No, wait. That won't work. Without doing
anything useful about global warming, Alaska
will be like Florida by the time we finish the
tunnel (or that idiotic fence along the southern
border).

> It uses a larger share of electricity than lighting
> so its banning would go a lot further towards
> saving the earth. Of course, that might create
> social conflict if folks follow my other suggestion
> that to avoid the need for cleaning shower walls
> one should just avoid showers.

There's a better solution than that as well: Save
water. Shower with a friend. One can wash
while the other scrubs the stall; then swap.

--

Regards,
Robert L Bass

=============================>
Bass Home Electronics
941-925-8650
4883 Fallcrest Circle
Sarasota · Florida · 34233
http://www.bassburglaralarms.com
=============================>



Posted by Clancy Wiggum on June 4, 2007, 2:13 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Robert L Bass wrote:

>There's a better solution than that as well: Save
>water. Shower with a friend. One can wash
>while the other scrubs the stall; then swap.

Ewww...

Leave your circle-jerk fantasies out of this.



Posted by Robert Green on June 3, 2007, 3:04 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>
> >I was thinking of making a jig from a 2 by 4 scraps with two v's cut so
that
> >I could rotate the base of the bulb around against a 1/2" Dremel cutoff
> >wheel at a fixed distance, sort of like a can opener.
>
> Are you insane? Cutting them open will void the warranty. ;-)
>
> AP has another coal story this morning.
>
>
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/G/GLOBAL_WARMING_STATES?SITE=AP&SECTION
=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2007-06-02-12-45-20

That article confirms something I've said before. In a state like Idaho,
where electricity comes from hydro, the CFL equation falls flat on its face.
They add mercury to the environment without providing any "offset" at the
stack because there IS no stack.

More than that, the article makes it clear that the biggest gains are going
to come from regulations limiting what coal plants can expel into the air.
It's going to make power more expensive, at least in the short run, but the
paybacks will be real and enormous. That much is clear from the record of
states that have taken the right steps. Dribs and drabs won't clean the air
and neither will the commercial sector because there's no profit in it.
That's when governments are supposed to step up and do the right thing.

There was an interesting sidebar, too:

NASA Chief Not Worried About Climate
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/N/NASA_CLIMATE_CHANGE?SITE=AP&SECTION=H
OME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2007-05-31-20-30-15

It makes the point that we're rather arrogant in assuming now that man rules
the planet, all climate change must cease. All it would take is another
Krakatoa-sized eruption in the world to turn on some serious global air
conditioning. The soot from such eruptions typically blocks significant
amounts of sunlight for years and years.

--
Bobby G.




Similar ThreadsPosted
Dissecting CFLs June 3, 2007, 9:49 am
CFLs: A brief test July 23, 2007, 10:35 am
Converting An Existing X10 System To Work With CFLs February 9, 2008, 8:30 pm
CFLs flicker when Wall Swtich WS467 is OFF March 5, 2008, 3:43 pm