Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by CarpathiaMan on May 1, 2008, 2:27 am
Please log in for more thread options Anyone here familiar with the utility called SpeedFan? I installed it because I wanted to determine the temperature of my CPU, and I need help interpreting the information. There's a reading labeled "CPU", and then one for each of my cores labeled "Core 0", "Core 1", etc. I have an Intel Core 2 Quad running at the stock speed of 2.50 GHz. "CPU" goes as low as 31C on idle and goes up to 38C on load, whereas the readouts for the individual cores idle in the 40s and go up to 55C on load. Which of these readings should I care about? The one labeled "CPU" or the ones for the individual cores? Do you think these readings are accurate? Thanks in advance for any advice. (By the way, I have a Tuniq Tower 120 heatsink.) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by darklight on May 1, 2008, 4:15 am
Please log in for more thread options can you provide the temp readings for each core under idle and load then the termal temp. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by code_wrong on May 1, 2008, 6:34 am
Please log in for more thread options
> Hello,
> > Anyone here familiar with the utility called SpeedFan? I installed it > because I wanted to determine the temperature of my CPU, and I need > help interpreting the information. > > There's a reading labeled "CPU", and then one for each of my cores > labeled "Core 0", "Core 1", etc. I have an Intel Core 2 Quad running > at the stock speed of 2.50 GHz. > > "CPU" goes as low as 31C on idle and goes up to 38C on load, whereas > the readouts for the individual cores idle in the 40s and go up to 55C > on load. > > Which of these readings should I care about? The one labeled "CPU" or > the ones for the individual cores? Do you think these readings are > accurate? > > Thanks in advance for any advice. > > (By the way, I have a Tuniq Tower 120 heatsink.) You have no problems there, my cpu hits just over 80c when my laptop goes down without warning. It's good in one respect, it does not damage the hardware, but it will be a problem if I am working on an important document at the time. currently I am reading the manual so I can take this thing to bits and properly clean the heatsink and fan. It's a big job on a laptop though. As regards which temperature you should be concerned about .. all of them cheers, code_wrong | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by code_wrong on May 1, 2008, 6:38 am
Please log in for more thread options
>
>> Hello,
>> >> Anyone here familiar with the utility called SpeedFan? I installed it >> because I wanted to determine the temperature of my CPU, and I need >> help interpreting the information. >> >> There's a reading labeled "CPU", and then one for each of my cores >> labeled "Core 0", "Core 1", etc. I have an Intel Core 2 Quad running >> at the stock speed of 2.50 GHz. >> >> "CPU" goes as low as 31C on idle and goes up to 38C on load, whereas >> the readouts for the individual cores idle in the 40s and go up to 55C >> on load. >> >> Which of these readings should I care about? The one labeled "CPU" or >> the ones for the individual cores? Do you think these readings are >> accurate? >> >> Thanks in advance for any advice. >> >> (By the way, I have a Tuniq Tower 120 heatsink.) >
> You have no problems there, my cpu hits just over 80c when my laptop goes > down without warning. > It's good in one respect, it does not damage the hardware, but it will be > a problem if I am working on an important document at the time. > > currently I am reading the manual so I can take this thing to bits and > properly clean the heatsink and fan. > It's a big job on a laptop though. > > As regards which temperature you should be concerned about .. all of them (EDIT: you only ned to be concerned if the temperatures are a good bit higher than you are experiencing) > cheers,
> code_wrong > > > | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Sleepy on May 1, 2008, 11:15 am
Please log in for more thread options
> Hello,
> > Anyone here familiar with the utility called SpeedFan? I installed it > because I wanted to determine the temperature of my CPU, and I need > help interpreting the information. > > There's a reading labeled "CPU", and then one for each of my cores > labeled "Core 0", "Core 1", etc. I have an Intel Core 2 Quad running > at the stock speed of 2.50 GHz. > > "CPU" goes as low as 31C on idle and goes up to 38C on load, whereas > the readouts for the individual cores idle in the 40s and go up to 55C > on load. > > Which of these readings should I care about? The one labeled "CPU" or > the ones for the individual cores? Do you think these readings are > accurate? > > Thanks in advance for any advice. > > (By the way, I have a Tuniq Tower 120 heatsink.) one core does more work than the other and that is the 'true' temp to keep an eye on. 55c is perfectly normal and nothing to worry about especially if you use a standard heatsink as supplied with a retail CPU. If you want to overclock - then get a decent 3rd party cooler that'll knock 5-10 degrees off those temps but otherwise you're fine. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| SpeedFan temperature readings | May 1, 2008, 2:27 am |
| Are these voltage readings normal? | March 30, 2007, 8:22 pm |
| PSU problems. Can someone interpret my voltage readings? | April 25, 2008, 2:57 pm |
| SpeedFan | July 31, 2006, 5:58 am |
| Speedfan Tip | October 23, 2008, 7:28 am |
| Re: [UPDATE] SpeedFan 4.34 | April 23, 2008, 11:05 am |
| ASUS BIOS change = Crazy Temparature Readings | October 7, 2006, 7:24 pm |
| Newbie: 3 lots of CPU temp in SpeedFan? 2 of them are overheating ... | November 25, 2006, 1:30 pm |
| Speedfan and undervolting and underclocking a pentium mobile cpu (toshiba satellite laptop) | January 31, 2007, 5:07 pm |
| Are "Core" Temperature And "CPU" Temperature The Same? | July 17, 2007, 2:30 pm |
| temperature | June 11, 2005, 8:38 pm |
| Get CPU Temperature | November 15, 2005, 12:53 am |
| amd temperature | October 24, 2006, 4:40 am |
| CPU temperature.... too hot? :o( | May 17, 2007, 4:39 am |
| CPU temperature and cooling fan | June 30, 2005, 11:41 am |

SpeedFan temperature readings
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 








>
> Anyone here familiar with the utility called SpeedFan? I installed it
> because I wanted to determine the temperature of my CPU, and I need
> help interpreting the information.
>
> There's a reading labeled "CPU", and then one for each of my cores
> labeled "Core 0", "Core 1", etc. I have an Intel Core 2 Quad running
> at the stock speed of 2.50 GHz.
>
> "CPU" goes as low as 31C on idle and goes up to 38C on load, whereas
> the readouts for the individual cores idle in the 40s and go up to 55C
> on load.
>
> Which of these readings should I care about? The one labeled "CPU" or
> the ones for the individual cores? Do you think these readings are
> accurate?
>
> Thanks in advance for any advice.
>
> (By the way, I have a Tuniq Tower 120 heatsink.)