Computer Hardware Need graphics card recommendation - Two monitors connected to one PC

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Need graphics card recommendation - Two monitors connected to one PC DaveJohnson12 11-09-05
Posted by on November 9, 2005, 3:27 am
Please log in for more thread options
It's a Small Form Factor computer so it needs a narrow card. I'll be connecting
two 17"
CRTs so I probably also need a way to connect at least one of them (maybe both)
to a DVI
output. The computer has a PCI Express slot.

I want a Dual Head card, not a second card with one monitor connected to each
card.

I'd like to keep the cost down, under $150 if possible. I need it mainly for
text so I
assume it doesn't have to be a powerful graphics card. It just has to be fast
enough to
display text on two monitors without making me wait for anything to appear on
the screen.

Clear text is important.

The OS is Windows XP Pro.

Thank you.


Posted by Ian East on November 9, 2005, 3:21 am
Please log in for more thread options
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 03:27:11 GMT, DaveJohnson12@nomail. wrote:

>It's a Small Form Factor computer so it needs a narrow card. I'll be connecting
two 17"
>CRTs so I probably also need a way to connect at least one of them (maybe both)
to a DVI
>output. The computer has a PCI Express slot.
>
>I want a Dual Head card, not a second card with one monitor connected to each
card.
>
>I'd like to keep the cost down, under $150 if possible. I need it mainly for
text so I
>assume it doesn't have to be a powerful graphics card. It just has to be fast
enough to
>display text on two monitors without making me wait for anything to appear on
the screen.
>
>Clear text is important.
>
>The OS is Windows XP Pro.
>
>Thank you.

The size of your CRT's isn't important... It's the resolution and
refresh rate you wish to run them at that matters. That and the
quality of your CRT will also determine the clarity of text. Nearly
all modern video cards are indistinguishable in 2D performance. It's
3D performance that people pay for in a high quality video card.
Since your system is PCI Express, that kind of limits you to the next
generation of cards which are mostly high performance gaming oriented
cards with external fans and such. The Dual DVI outputs are usually
only on full size cards. I've seen slimline versions of the ATI X300
SE with one DVI and one DB15 (VGA) connector. You're probably not
going to have a lot of selection though.


Posted by on November 14, 2005, 3:15 am
Please log in for more thread options

>On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 03:27:11 GMT, DaveJohnson12@nomail. wrote:
>
>>It's a Small Form Factor computer so it needs a narrow card. I'll be
connecting two 17"
>>CRTs so I probably also need a way to connect at least one of them (maybe
both) to a DVI
>>output. The computer has a PCI Express slot.
>>
>>I want a Dual Head card, not a second card with one monitor connected to each
card.
>>
>>I'd like to keep the cost down, under $150 if possible. I need it mainly for
text so I
>>assume it doesn't have to be a powerful graphics card. It just has to be fast
enough to
>>display text on two monitors without making me wait for anything to appear on
the screen.
>>
>>Clear text is important.
>>
>>The OS is Windows XP Pro.
>>
>>Thank you.
>
>The size of your CRT's isn't important... It's the resolution and
>refresh rate you wish to run them at that matters. That and the
>quality of your CRT will also determine the clarity of text. Nearly
>all modern video cards are indistinguishable in 2D performance.

I don't really know much about it but I did see someone saying his Asus
ATI X300 didn't display text clearly.

> It's
>3D performance that people pay for in a high quality video card.
>Since your system is PCI Express, that kind of limits you to the next
>generation of cards which are mostly high performance gaming oriented
>cards with external fans and such. The Dual DVI outputs are usually
>only on full size cards. I've seen slimline versions of the ATI X300
>SE with one DVI and one DB15 (VGA) connector. You're probably not
>going to have a lot of selection though.

Thanks. Do you think the X300 is fast enough for two monitors at 1024 x 768 and
70 Hz?


Posted by S.Heenan on November 14, 2005, 6:00 am
Please log in for more thread options
DaveJohnson12@nomail. wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 03:27:11 GMT, DaveJohnson12@nomail. wrote:
>>
>>> It's a Small Form Factor computer so it needs a narrow card. I'll
>>> be connecting two 17" CRTs so I probably also need a way to connect
>>> at least one of them (maybe both) to a DVI output. The computer has
>>> a PCI Express slot.
>>>
>>> I want a Dual Head card, not a second card with one monitor
>>> connected to each card.
>>>
>>> I'd like to keep the cost down, under $150 if possible. I need it
>>> mainly for text so I assume it doesn't have to be a powerful
>>> graphics card. It just has to be fast enough to display text on two
>>> monitors without making me wait for anything to appear on the
>>> screen.
>>>
>>> Clear text is important.
>>>
>>> The OS is Windows XP Pro.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>
>> The size of your CRT's isn't important... It's the resolution and
>> refresh rate you wish to run them at that matters. That and the
>> quality of your CRT will also determine the clarity of text. Nearly
>> all modern video cards are indistinguishable in 2D performance.
>
> I don't really know much about it but I did see someone saying his
> Asus
> ATI X300 didn't display text clearly.
>
>> It's
>> 3D performance that people pay for in a high quality video card.
>> Since your system is PCI Express, that kind of limits you to the next
>> generation of cards which are mostly high performance gaming oriented
>> cards with external fans and such. The Dual DVI outputs are usually
>> only on full size cards. I've seen slimline versions of the ATI X300
>> SE with one DVI and one DB15 (VGA) connector. You're probably not
>> going to have a lot of selection though.
>
> Thanks. Do you think the X300 is fast enough for two monitors at 1024
> x 768 and 70 Hz?



Take a look at the Matrox P650 for excellent 2D.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814106153

--
If linux is the answer, it must have been a stupid question.




Posted by on November 15, 2005, 2:54 am
Please log in for more thread options

>DaveJohnson12@nomail. wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 03:27:11 GMT, DaveJohnson12@nomail. wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's a Small Form Factor computer so it needs a narrow card. I'll
>>>> be connecting two 17" CRTs so I probably also need a way to connect
>>>> at least one of them (maybe both) to a DVI output. The computer has
>>>> a PCI Express slot.
>>>>
>>>> I want a Dual Head card, not a second card with one monitor
>>>> connected to each card.
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to keep the cost down, under $150 if possible. I need it
>>>> mainly for text so I assume it doesn't have to be a powerful
>>>> graphics card. It just has to be fast enough to display text on two
>>>> monitors without making me wait for anything to appear on the
>>>> screen.
>>>>
>>>> Clear text is important.
>>>>
>>>> The OS is Windows XP Pro.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> The size of your CRT's isn't important... It's the resolution and
>>> refresh rate you wish to run them at that matters. That and the
>>> quality of your CRT will also determine the clarity of text. Nearly
>>> all modern video cards are indistinguishable in 2D performance.
>>
>> I don't really know much about it but I did see someone saying his
>> Asus
>> ATI X300 didn't display text clearly.
>>
>>> It's
>>> 3D performance that people pay for in a high quality video card.
>>> Since your system is PCI Express, that kind of limits you to the next
>>> generation of cards which are mostly high performance gaming oriented
>>> cards with external fans and such. The Dual DVI outputs are usually
>>> only on full size cards. I've seen slimline versions of the ATI X300
>>> SE with one DVI and one DB15 (VGA) connector. You're probably not
>>> going to have a lot of selection though.
>>
>> Thanks. Do you think the X300 is fast enough for two monitors at 1024
>> x 768 and 70 Hz?
>
>
>
>Take a look at the Matrox P650 for excellent 2D.
>
>http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814106153

Thanks. I have a PCI Express slot and it needs a slimline/small form factor
card. AGP
won't work.


Similar ThreadsPosted
Need graphics card recommendation - Two monitors connected to one PC November 9, 2005, 3:27 am
Remedy for bad graphics card bios flash --- use PCI graphics card WITH dead AGP card to reflash bios January 22, 2006, 9:31 am
Fanless graphics cards recommendation November 23, 2007, 4:11 pm
Sytem does not boot when HD is connected to SATA PCI card. August 10, 2005, 1:47 am
TV Card Recommendation April 26, 2006, 8:35 pm
GFX card recommendation October 17, 2006, 5:05 am
TV Tuner Card Recommendation March 11, 2006, 7:38 am
Sound card recommendation? January 12, 2007, 3:21 pm
4 Port RS232 PCI Card recommendation July 3, 2008, 2:03 pm
Integrated Graphics + Graphics Card November 5, 2006, 8:32 am
Dual Monitors using AGP Card and On-Board Video January 9, 2008, 3:56 pm
Graphics card June 5, 2005, 10:44 am
new graphics card July 18, 2005, 10:50 pm
Which graphics card to get? August 9, 2005, 1:28 pm
Graphics Card October 15, 2005, 9:16 am