LCD question
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Alan S on November 10, 2005, 12:07 pm
Please log in for more thread options effect going on. It looks like the border between pixels is way thicker in proportion to the pixel size itself, which gives the image a pixelated retro look. I'd never seen this on 17" or 18" LCDs. Is it normal for 20" or is it because this brand/model is bottom of the line for 20"? What about Samsung 204T? TIA. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by BillL on November 10, 2005, 5:55 pm
Please log in for more thread options Best get the obvious questions out of the way ;o) Are you running it at its native resolution? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Alan S on November 11, 2005, 2:49 am
Please log in for more thread options
>> I've just got a 20" Viewsonic VP2000s but there's a major screening
>> effect going on. It looks like the border between pixels is way >> thicker in proportion to the pixel size itself, which gives the image >> a pixelated retro look. I'd never seen this on 17" or 18" LCDs. Is it >> normal for 20" or is it because this brand/model is bottom of the line >> for 20"? What about Samsung 204T? TIA. >Best get the obvious questions out of the way ;o) Are you running it at its
>native resolution? Of course. FWIW, I'm looking at the screen with a loupe now and it looks like the vertical spacing between pixels is about 1/3 of the height of the pixel itself. Horizontal gaps are smaller. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Quaoar on November 11, 2005, 7:29 am
Please log in for more thread options
>
>>> I've just got a 20" Viewsonic VP2000s but there's a major screening
>>> effect going on. It looks like the border between pixels is way >>> thicker in proportion to the pixel size itself, which gives the >>> image >>> a pixelated retro look. I'd never seen this on 17" or 18" LCDs. Is >>> it >>> normal for 20" or is it because this brand/model is bottom of the >>> line >>> for 20"? What about Samsung 204T? TIA. >
>>Best get the obvious questions out of the way ;o) Are you running it
>>at its >>native resolution? >
> Of course. > > FWIW, I'm looking at the screen with a loupe now and it looks like the > vertical spacing between pixels is about 1/3 of the height of the > pixel itself. Horizontal gaps are smaller. > Answer Bill's question: are you running the monitor at it's default resolution? Q | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Alan S on November 11, 2005, 3:29 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>>>Best get the obvious questions out of the way ;o) Are you running it
>>>at its >>>native resolution? >> Of course.
>Answer Bill's question: are you running the monitor at it's default
>resolution? Of course. Selbstverständlich. Por supuesto. Naturellement. Naturalmente. Oh, you asked for the "default" resolution, not "native". D'oh! (And yes, convergence (!?) is fine too, I suppose). Responses have been, umm, interesting, so far <g>
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| AT/ATX PS question | July 10, 2005, 11:49 pm |
| UPS Question | September 29, 2005, 9:55 am |
| Question about DSL | October 29, 2005, 11:29 am |
| LCD question | November 10, 2005, 12:07 pm |
| PSU question???/ | November 26, 2005, 11:30 pm |
| HDD Question | December 21, 2005, 12:00 pm |
| DVD-RW question | January 11, 2006, 9:51 am |
| Question regarding 32- and 64-bit PCI | March 8, 2006, 12:05 am |
| usb question | May 25, 2006, 10:59 pm |
| Question about PSU | August 13, 2006, 8:07 pm |
| UPS question | October 21, 2006, 3:24 pm |
| fsb question | October 29, 2006, 2:43 pm |
| Ram question... | November 6, 2006, 5:35 pm |
| DR2 question ? | November 29, 2006, 7:51 pm |
| RAN Question | January 11, 2007, 1:57 pm |
> effect going on. It looks like the border between pixels is way
> thicker in proportion to the pixel size itself, which gives the image
> a pixelated retro look. I'd never seen this on 17" or 18" LCDs. Is it
> normal for 20" or is it because this brand/model is bottom of the line
> for 20"? What about Samsung 204T? TIA.
>