Sorry, but if you cannot explain why that would be so how should any fool understand your point?
What is the "more" in protection a WRT54G (which we are talking about here, don't we) with standard firmware (not a third party firmware) provides over a single or multiple windows PCs with a XP SP2 firewall set with no exceptions allowed and connected directly to the internet?
You just say NAT is better the SP2 FW but you never explain why. You give no arguments why that would be so. I have tried to explain the reasons for my statement (which you have not cited).
And whenever I see someone whose only "arguments" are like "it is obvious" or "only a fool" I get very suspicious...
Thus would you please explain?
Gerald