SMF-28 attenuation vs wavelength

Have a question or want to start a discussion? Post it! No Registration Necessary.  Now with pictures!

Threaded View

I'm looking for the fibre SMF-28 attenuation vs wavelength in the range  
1550 - 1630 nm.
I just can find the typical 0.2 dB/km.



Re: SMF-28 attenuation vs wavelength

Quoted text here. Click to load it

And your problem with that is what, precisely?

SMF-28 is a bit old-school. Not sure where to dig up a product data  
sheet for it at this date. Ah, here's a blast from 2002 just for that.

for the worst case, take the non-premium fiber number at 1550 and apply  
the attenuation .vs. wavelength adjustment to get 0.27 dB/km (and look  
at the typical fiber graph to extrapolate downward towards 1600)

SMF-28e+ has a currently available datasheet, which pretty much says you  
probably have an acceptable number already. The water-peak reduction is  
at shorter wavelengths than you are asking about, so it probably has  
little effect .vs. old SMF-28, if that is what you have.

1550 - 0.19-0.20 dB/km 1525-1575 delta 0.03 dB/km
1625 - 0.20-0.23 dB/km

Those are maximums, for design purposes - a link designed with those  
numbers and correctly installed should function. Actual attenuation  
could be less without violating specs.  

If you have a need for "actual" rather than "maximum" attenuation,  
you'll have to measure it, and reduce all points of measurement error as  
much as possible if you feel a need for greater precision. That will  
tell you what the piece of cable you are measuring will do - it may not  
generalize to other cables well.

If you have a need for greater reliability, assume 0.25 dB/km and build  
in some margin.

If you have some other need, please explain it more completely, and you  
might get a better answer.

This link discusses attenuation .vs. wavelength somewhat generally, with  
graphs you might find helpful. Paste it together if it gets mangled in  

Cats, coffee, chocolate...vices to live by
Please don't feed the trolls. Killfile and ignore them so they will go away.

Site Timeline