Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
Posted by vicky on July 4, 2008, 2:00 am
Please log in for more thread options > > As u mentioned here above in u'r point that
>
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 if the bridge is "tunneling=
," or bridging, an
> > FDDI
another FDDI LAN,
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0> frame from one FDDI LAN to= > > for example, and there
between the two FDDI
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0> are some Ethernet segments= > > LANs, then the VLAN
ource routing"
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0> tag can carry that FDDI "s= > > information. It's a way of
rent MACs to be
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0> allowing frames from diffe= > > bridged, without losing
vailable in the non-
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0> extra header information a= > > Ethernet LANs.
>
> > so for doing that function is a brigde is capable of doing routing (is
> > bridge is source routed bridge) or it done at normally also. >
> Tunneling is *not* routing. The point made above is that an Ethernet > bridge can be used to tunnel source-route information (including CFI > information) between two source-route-capable LANs (e.g., Token Ring or > FDDI) across a non-source-route-capable Ethernet backbone. The Ethernet > bridge is not performing any source-route function, only passing along > the information. > > > One more thing is about that type of tunneling is it done
> > automatically or a programmer has also play a role for this , and if a > > programmer has a role than also tell me some about of this role. >
lting
> The tunneling function must be designed into the bridge. It can be > performed either in hardware or software. > > -- > Rich Seifert =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Networks and Communications Consu= > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 21885 Bear Creek Way
> (408) 395-5700 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Los Gatos, CA 95033 > (408) 228-0803 FAX > > Send replies to: usenet at richseifert dot com- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - ----------------------------------------------------------- can u please highligted the following with detail.................... The tunneling function must be designed into the bridge. It can be performed either in hardware or software. Thanks regards Vikrant Pandey | ||||
|
Posted by Rich Seifert on July 4, 2008, 11:22 am
Please log in for more thread options > can u please highligted the following with detail....................
> > The tunneling function must be designed into the > bridge. It can be > performed either in hardware or software. > The statement means exactly what it says. A device cannot tunnel unless it is designed to do so. The tunneling function can be implemented either in hardware (e.g., in a finite-state machine), or in software (e.g., as code executed by a microprocessor). The choice is a matter of implementation preference, performance, and cost. -- Rich Seifert Networks and Communications Consulting 21885 Bear Creek Way (408) 395-5700 Los Gatos, CA 95033 (408) 228-0803 FAX Send replies to: usenet at richseifert dot com | ||||
|
Posted by vicky on July 14, 2008, 1:47 am
Please log in for more thread options Hello
Please access my share web file link --- http://vikrantpandey.diinoweb.com/files/ and please see my query which is in the vlan case1.jpg file. Thanks in advance Vikrant | ||||
|
Posted by vicky on July 5, 2008, 9:24 am
Please log in for more thread options Hello Sir
What u say about inter-port based-vlan communication is it possible ..... if yes plz tell how ???? please......... Thanks Vikrant | ||||
|
Posted by Walter Roberson on July 5, 2008, 11:02 am
Please log in for more thread options
>What u say about inter-port based-vlan communication is it
>possible ..... if >yes plz tell how ???? >please......... It is *not* possible on any Layer 2 switch unless that switch has bugs in its hardware or software. (Some Layer 2 switches allow you to deliberately configure intra-vlan communications, but I count that as a bug.) | ||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| route field | June 29, 2008, 4:16 am |
| Static route or NAT | January 9, 2008, 2:42 am |
| Backup-Route + Traffic | June 11, 2007, 6:09 am |
| Cisco Router route statement | November 20, 2004, 10:19 am |
| VLANs: do all switches in a route have to support it? | March 11, 2005, 1:25 am |
| 802.11 Fixed Field Elements | September 8, 2006, 4:07 pm |
| Why we need a length field in Ethernet while we don't need it in FDDI?? | January 18, 2005, 4:04 am |
| Multicast MAC in Source MAC Address Field | August 30, 2005, 5:13 pm |
| Length field in 802.3 for tagged frames | November 24, 2006, 4:02 am |
| Managed Ethernet Field Switch Provides Support for Tarrifed Wireless and Fiber-to-Premises Applications | June 21, 2005, 3:06 pm |

route field
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 








>
>
>
>
>
>