IPG - Inter Packed Gap - why defined to 96 bits?

Have a question or want to start a discussion? Post it! No Registration Necessary.  Now with pictures!

Threaded View
Hi All,
Why IPG is defined as 96 bits? Does anybody know?
Are IPG and IFG (Inter Frame Gap) the same?
Thank you!

Re: IPG - Inter Packed Gap - why defined to 96 bits?
dmitryl.home@gmail.com wrote:
Quoted text here. Click to load it

I suspect that Inter-Packet Gap and Inter-Frame Gap are one and the
same.  Packet is a "generic" term for all manner of "packets."  Frame
is the specific term used to describe a packet at the Ethernet (and
perhaps similar) layer.  Datagram is the IPv4 and IPv6 specific name
for a "packet" there, and "segment" is the name in the context of TCP.

So, you can have a TCP segment carried in an IP datagram which itself
is carried in an Ethernet frame, and it is all one big, happy "packet."

As for why 96 bits, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interframe_gap
doesn't get terribly specific, but the one reason it gives - to allow
a device to get ready to receive the next frame - is something that I
seem to recall being at least part of the reason.  I suspect the
original Ethernet specification may go into the details.

rick jones
I don't interest myself in "why." I think more often in terms of
"when," sometimes "where;" always "how much."  - Joubert
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :)
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...

Site Timeline