Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Andy Ball on July 22, 2005, 10:47 am
Please log in for more thread options Hello, I have a hypothetical question with practical implications: Two computers, 'A' and 'B', are plugged into a 100baseTX switch. Computer 'A' has a 100baseTX interface and computer 'B' has a 10baseT card. When 'A' is talking to 'B' through the switch, does it send its frames at the slower 10 Mbit/sec rate, or does it send to the switch at the full 100 Mbit/sec and the switch shift it out slower to 'B'? - Andy Ball | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by James Knott on July 22, 2005, 10:30 am
Please log in for more thread options Andy Ball wrote: "A" will send at the full rate. If the switch doesn't use flow control, the buffers will eventually fill and frames will be lost. However, the TCP protocol also has it's own flow control mechanisms, that cause it to back off, when switch congestion causes delays or lost frames. This will reduce the amount of data that "A" tries to send through the switch. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by James Knott on July 22, 2005, 10:42 am
Please log in for more thread options
James Knott wrote: > Andy Ball wrote:
> >>
>> Hello, >> >> I have a hypothetical question with practical implications: Two >> computers, 'A' and 'B', are plugged into a 100baseTX switch. Computer >> 'A' has a 100baseTX interface and computer 'B' has a 10baseT card. >> When 'A' is talking to 'B' through the switch, does it send its frames >> at the slower 10 Mbit/sec rate, or does it send to the switch at the >> full 100 Mbit/sec and the switch shift it out slower to 'B'? >
> "A" will send at the full rate. If the switch doesn't use flow control, > the > buffers will eventually fill and frames will be lost. However, the TCP > protocol also has it's own flow control mechanisms, that cause it to back > off, when switch congestion causes delays or lost frames. This will > reduce the amount of data that "A" tries to send through the switch. Forgot to mention: look up IEEE 802.3x flow control. This flow control mechanism uses a "pause" MAC control frame to tell another device to stop sending for a specified period of time. However, flow control is optional, so not all switches use it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by anoop on July 26, 2005, 12:19 pm
Please log in for more thread options
James Knott wrote: > Forgot to mention: look up IEEE 802.3x flow control. This flow control
> mechanism uses a "pause" MAC control frame to tell another device to stop > sending for a specified period of time. However, flow control is optional, > so not all switches use it. It's optional at 100 Mbps but mandatory at 1 Gbps and above. However, most folks caution against enabling 802.3x for any ports other than those connected directly to an end-station because it causes head of line (HOL) blocking. Anoop | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Andy Ball on July 26, 2005, 6:59 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Hello James, JK> Forgot to mention: look up IEEE 802.3x flow control.
> This flow control mechanism uses a "pause" MAC control > frame to tell another device to stop sending for a > specified period of time. However, flow control is > optional, so not all switches use it. Thanks, that's useful information. Something to look for on switch data sheets too. - Andy. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Switch Question | July 22, 2005, 10:47 am |
| switch/stacking question | April 8, 2005, 12:45 pm |
| 3-Com Switch 3C16479 Question | February 10, 2007, 7:56 pm |
| Switch Uplink & bandwidth question | January 8, 2005, 2:55 pm |
| VLAN - switch -> trunk -> switch - priority queuing ? | August 19, 2006, 2:31 pm |
| STP question | October 29, 2004, 1:59 pm |
| a question about STP 802.1d | December 7, 2004, 3:03 pm |
| NAT question... | January 21, 2005, 5:07 am |
| Question regarding 802.1x | March 2, 2005, 7:32 pm |
| Re: A question for the NG | December 11, 2006, 1:44 pm |
| Re: A question for the NG | December 11, 2006, 5:58 pm |
| Monitoring question! | July 30, 2004, 5:50 pm |
| a question about igmp | September 15, 2004, 1:36 am |
| eternet question | October 15, 2004, 6:52 pm |
| A question about 802.1d based CoS | October 20, 2004, 1:04 am |

Switch Question
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 








> Hello,
>
> I have a hypothetical question with practical implications: Two
> computers, 'A' and 'B', are plugged into a 100baseTX switch. Computer
> 'A' has a 100baseTX interface and computer 'B' has a 10baseT card.
> When 'A' is talking to 'B' through the switch, does it send its frames
> at the slower 10 Mbit/sec rate, or does it send to the switch at the
> full 100 Mbit/sec and the switch shift it out slower to 'B'?