RSTP timing parameters
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
||||||||||
|
Posted by Christopher Nelson on June 2, 2005, 2:32 pm
Please log in for more thread options I've seen a recommendation that the timing parameters for an RSTP network (max age, forwarding delay, etc.) be consistent throughout the network. While I haven't come up with a good reason to have them different, I wonder what the rationale is for keeping them the same. Any insight would be appreciated.... TIA. | ||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| RSTP timing parameters | June 2, 2005, 2:32 pm |
| Why is the loop timing necessary in PHY? | February 21, 2006, 1:04 am |
| Fault-Timing Analysis Software - Contest | October 12, 2004, 7:14 pm |
| Limits on IGMP tuning parameters | October 26, 2004, 8:53 am |
| performance parameters of Ethrnet packet std IEEE 802.3 | July 9, 2004, 2:23 am |
| STP-RSTP query | October 16, 2008, 3:29 am |
| Topology change in RSTP | May 15, 2006, 4:08 am |
| STP and RSTP congergence time | May 9, 2008, 12:10 pm |
| RSTP - Changing Forward Delay | July 15, 2008, 11:00 am |
| How is a break/reconfiguration propagated in an RSTP network? | December 15, 2005, 7:19 am |
| How to test Ring such as EAPS or RSTP recovery time? | December 15, 2008, 12:45 am |