Question: LACP
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
||||||||||
|
Posted by CD> on December 11, 2006, 11:35 am
Please log in for more thread options Hi, I am working with LACP for past 1 year. I have the following doubt. Consider a scenario Actor ----- Port A1 Port A2 Port A3 Partner ------- Port B1 Port B2 Port B3 The connections of the port are as follows: A1-B1 A2-B2 A3-B3 So when these ports are connected and configured, can A1 be the first port to join the LAG on Actor and B2 be the first port to join the LAG on Partner side? Is this a valid scenario? Thanx, Chetandeep Singh | ||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Question: LACP | December 11, 2006, 11:35 am |
| LACP behaviour | December 12, 2007, 1:01 am |
| LACP - wait while timer | December 15, 2006, 10:47 am |
| Need info about LACP handshake | May 21, 2007, 5:14 pm |
| Need info about LACP handshake | May 21, 2007, 5:13 pm |
| MSTP, LACP (and possible UDLD?) | February 8, 2008, 11:55 am |
| Testing Link aggregation without LACP | January 25, 2007, 3:45 am |
| Is explicit switch configuration for dynamic lacp required????? | December 22, 2005, 8:52 am |
| STP question | October 29, 2004, 1:59 pm |
| a question about STP 802.1d | December 7, 2004, 3:03 pm |
| NAT question... | January 21, 2005, 5:07 am |
| Question regarding 802.1x | March 2, 2005, 7:32 pm |
| Re: A question for the NG | December 11, 2006, 1:44 pm |
| Re: A question for the NG | December 11, 2006, 5:58 pm |
| Monitoring question! | July 30, 2004, 5:50 pm |