Ethernet LAN Picking an IP multicast address

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Picking an IP multicast address Chris Nelson 10-29-04
Posted by Chris Nelson on October 29, 2004, 1:03 pm
Please log in for more thread options
I'm building a network of fairly stupid devices. Most if not all
communication with them will be via MAC-addressable frames. They
aren't big or smart enough to have an IP stack, complex, heavy-weight
discovery protocols, etc. BUT, I also need 'Windows-based tools to be
able to reach these devices and _that_ is facilitated by writing to a
multicast _IP_ address and letting the stack just do the normal thing
of mapping that IP into a multicast MAC address.

The problem I have is picking the multicast IP address. I know some
are reseerved (all hosts, all routers, etc.) and I know there are
protocols for having one assigned dynamically on a network at run
time. But, as I said, these devices are too stupid to negotiate for
that assignment. Is there one or more multicast IP addresses that are
intended to be used like network 10 (10.192.x.x, 10.168.x.x, etc.) for
local, private communication?

Thanks for any pointers.

Chris


Posted by glen herrmannsfeldt on October 30, 2004, 10:58 am
Please log in for more thread options
Chris Nelson wrote:

> I'm building a network of fairly stupid devices. Most if not all
> communication with them will be via MAC-addressable frames. They
> aren't big or smart enough to have an IP stack, complex, heavy-weight
> discovery protocols, etc. BUT, I also need 'Windows-based tools to be
> able to reach these devices and _that_ is facilitated by writing to a
> multicast _IP_ address and letting the stack just do the normal thing
> of mapping that IP into a multicast MAC address.

20 years ago diskless machines could boot with RARP and TFTP/UDP
in maybe an 8K ROM, with the disk boot code in there, too.

I really find it hard to believe that even the smallest machine
today couldn't do it. (Though I would hope BOOTP or DHCP instead
of RARP.)

UDP is much easier than TCP. TFTP was designed to be easy to
implement in a small ROM.

The only system that I legitimately believe should be able
to work without IP is the system to power up machines based
on a special ethernet frame. Only the NIC is available to
process it, as the machine is off!

-- glen



Similar ThreadsPosted
Picking an IP multicast address October 29, 2004, 1:03 pm
Multicast MAC and Unicast IP Address August 18, 2005, 7:54 pm
Multicast MAC in Source MAC Address Field August 30, 2005, 5:13 pm
Multicast test bed October 18, 2004, 8:51 am
multicast, MAC ending with 00:96 ? August 14, 2005, 12:55 am
ARP reply containing a multicast MAC OK? March 19, 2007, 4:50 pm
Multicast pruning July 2, 2008, 7:24 am
Multicast VLAN Id July 14, 2008, 7:41 am
Maximum MAC multicast filters? October 5, 2005, 8:48 am
Extreme Networks 300-48 Multicast issues January 11, 2005, 1:55 am
MAC address of an IPv6 address April 10, 2007, 4:42 pm
Mac address recovery December 17, 2004, 9:07 am
Change MAC address January 25, 2005, 8:53 am
Valid mac address February 7, 2006, 8:21 pm
Change MAC address June 20, 2007, 7:19 am