Packet recorder
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Tom D on August 8, 2007, 11:36 am
Please log in for more thread options I am looking for a packet recorder that supports Gigabit Ethernet (1000BASE-T). This recorder will be used on an IP network. The Solera Networks DS4500 with 5Gbps capture rate and 16 TB of storage is roughly what I am looking for. However, it's not usually a good idea to stop at the first product you happen upon. I would like the unit to be 19" rack mount, but that is not a strict requirement. RAID is preferable. Upgradeable is preferable. This is for a data acquistion system. Therefore, storage space is proportional to recording time. Any pointers (URLs) to companies making something like this is helpful. Thanks! | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Matthias Gruber on August 8, 2007, 12:22 pm
Please log in for more thread options > Any pointers (URLs) to companies making something like this is helpful.
http://www.wildpackets.com/products/omnipliance/overview | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Patrick Klos on August 8, 2007, 2:27 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>I am looking for a packet recorder that supports Gigabit Ethernet
>(1000BASE-T). This recorder will be used on an IP network. > >The Solera Networks DS4500 with 5Gbps capture rate and 16 TB of storage is >roughly what I am looking for. However, it's not usually a good idea to >stop at the first product you happen upon. > >I would like the unit to be 19" rack mount, but that is not a strict >requirement. RAID is preferable. Upgradeable is preferable. > >This is for a data acquistion system. Therefore, storage space is >proportional to recording time. Our PacketView Pro product is designed to run on standard off-the-shelf hardware under Windows 2000 or Windows XP. We have done a lot of work to crank up the capture rate for "standard" hardware. I can't say for sure what our maximum capture rate is (of course that depends largely on the processor, memory and NIC adapter/driver), but I've never run across issues where it has been unable to keep up with the packets on a gigabit network. Feel free to contact me directly if you'd like to discuss details? If you're local to southern New Hampshire (or eastern Massachusetts), I'll even bring in a machine to test the capture on your network if you like? Patrick ========= For LAN/WAN Protocol Analysis, check out PacketView Pro! ========= Patrick Klos Email: patrick@klos.com Klos Technologies, Inc. Web: http://www.klos.com/ ============================================================================ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Packet recorder | August 8, 2007, 11:36 am |
| XGMII end of packet | July 20, 2004, 4:19 am |
| Generate packet with bad CRC | June 21, 2007, 9:15 am |
| Packet capture | November 28, 2007, 12:07 am |
| Creating a test packet | October 13, 2005, 11:21 am |
| ethernet packet preamble | May 4, 2006, 2:01 pm |
| determination of length of packet............ | October 18, 2006, 1:41 am |
| Source MAC address per IP packet | June 15, 2008, 3:02 pm |
| Packet Engines PowerRail 1000 | April 26, 2005, 8:06 pm |
| Packet Coming From Router Disappears | June 24, 2006, 2:45 am |
| MS-Dos 6.22 Packet Driver for 3COM 3C2000 ? | March 13, 2007, 10:53 am |
| performance parameters of Ethrnet packet std IEEE 802.3 | July 9, 2004, 2:23 am |
| Extract data from packet dump (pcap) | January 12, 2005, 2:31 pm |
| slow smtp issue/packet capture | December 18, 2006, 10:24 am |
| Does wireshark have the ability to edit and send packet?? Any other software have??? | December 5, 2006, 3:03 am |