Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by vicky on June 27, 2008, 2:28 am
Please log in for more thread options > > Can u plz tell me about the DA (Destination Mac Address) =A0 and =A0 SA
> > (Source mac Address) >
> > of a frame which contains multicast data (or multicast member ship
> > requist or leave requist) >
> > is at this case =A0is =A0DA =3D=3D SA
> > or SA contain a unique mac address of either router or host. >
lting
> You really should read the relevant standards (IEEE 802.3, IEEE > 802.1D/Q) and then ask your questions, rather that looking to this group > to provide a tutorial on every aspect of your design. > > That said, a source MAC address is never a multicast; it is always a > unique identifier of the station sending the frame, whether an end > station or router. > > -- > Rich Seifert =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Networks and Communications Consu= > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 21885 Bear Creek Way
> (408) 395-5700 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Los Gatos, CA 95033 > (408) 228-0803 FAX > > Send replies to: usenet at richseifert dot com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- Hello Sir, I've a query with me regarding with Single STP with multiple port based vlans then What u say about a single instance of STP is used for all port based vlans for exp- If using a switch controller with only IEEE 802.1D support and using port based vlans then plz tell me is at this scenerio any mechanism is implemented for making inter - vlan data transmission accessible. Thanks Vikrant | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Walter Roberson on June 27, 2008, 2:52 am
Please log in for more thread options >I've a query with me regarding with Single STP with multiple port
>based vlans >then
>What u say about a single instance of STP is used for all port based >vlans >for exp-
>If using a switch controller with only IEEE 802.1D support and using
>port based vlans >then plz tell me is at this scenerio any mechanism is implemented for
>making inter - vlan data transmission accessible. I believe the answer is NO, in that case there is no such mechanism. (I looked at your diagram.) Single instance STP does not know anything about VLANs and will not take VLANs into account in creating the spanning tree. If that happens to cut a link needed for a particular VLAN to make it through the switches between two points, then Tough Tootsies. Do not use single-instance STP with VLANs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by vicky on June 27, 2008, 3:16 am
Please log in for more thread options On Jun 27, 11:52=A0am, rober...@hushmail.com (Walter Roberson) wrote:
> In article <a3103bea-bfcf-4070-b916-e25ac6b4a...@a9g2000prl.googlegroups.=
com>, > > >I've a query with me regarding with Single STP with multiple port
> >based vlans > >then > >What u say about a single instance of STP is used for all port based > >vlans > >for exp- > >If using a switch controller with only IEEE 802.1D support and using > >port based vlans > >then plz tell me is at this scenerio any mechanism is implemented for > >making inter - vlan data transmission accessible. >
> I believe the answer is NO, in that case there is no such mechanism. > (I looked at your diagram.) > > Single instance STP does not know anything about VLANs and will > not take VLANs into account in creating the spanning tree. > If that happens to cut a link needed for a particular VLAN to make > it through the switches between two points, then Tough Tootsies. > Do not use single-instance STP with VLANs. ----------------------------------------------------------------- please check the following link http://vikrantpandey.diinoweb.com/files/ here a file named as stp.txt and tell me plz what u say about this situation is a switch controller support for inter vlan data transmission is necessary for that situation. Thanks Vikrant | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Rich Seifert on June 27, 2008, 11:07 am
Please log in for more thread options In article
> On Jun 27, 11:52 am, rober...@hushmail.com (Walter Roberson) wrote:
> > In article
> > > > >I've a query with me regarding with Single STP with multiple port
> > >based vlans > > >then > > >What u say about a single instance of STP is used for all port based > > >vlans > > >for exp- > > >If using a switch controller with only IEEE 802.1D support and using > > >port based vlans > > >then plz tell me is at this scenerio any mechanism is implemented for > > >making inter - vlan data transmission accessible. > >
> > I believe the answer is NO, in that case there is no such mechanism. > > (I looked at your diagram.) > > > > Single instance STP does not know anything about VLANs and will > > not take VLANs into account in creating the spanning tree. > > If that happens to cut a link needed for a particular VLAN to make > > it through the switches between two points, then Tough Tootsies. > > Do not use single-instance STP with VLANs. >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > please check the following link > > http://vikrantpandey.diinoweb.com/files/ > > > here a file named as stp.txt > > and tell me plz what u say about this situation > is a switch controller support for inter vlan data transmission is > necessary for that situation. > Your question has been answered, at least twice and perhaps more times. I am sorry if you do not understand the answer. Perhaps you should read the relevant standards, or an appropriate text book, so that you can better understand the technology. -- Rich Seifert Networks and Communications Consulting 21885 Bear Creek Way (408) 395-5700 Los Gatos, CA 95033 (408) 228-0803 FAX Send replies to: usenet at richseifert dot com | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Mac address and VLAns | June 17, 2008, 1:27 am |
| subclassed IP address ranges using 802.1Q VLANs | January 19, 2005, 3:25 pm |
| MAC address of an IPv6 address | April 10, 2007, 4:42 pm |
| 802.1q vlans trunking | June 13, 2005, 5:09 am |
| An interface on many VLANs | November 24, 2005, 8:05 pm |
| Two different VLANs on the same port | December 15, 2006, 8:02 am |
| VLANS and subnetting | September 30, 2007, 5:44 pm |
| VLANs on a 3COM Superstack III | July 21, 2004, 12:28 pm |
| 3Com untagged vs. 802.1Q VLANs | February 22, 2005, 1:44 pm |
| Multiple VLANs on Single NIC | January 19, 2006, 8:06 am |
| VLANs and VoIP phones | July 27, 2006, 8:07 am |
| Port Based VLANs | September 10, 2006, 2:28 pm |
| VPC or VMWare and Vlans an intersting one. | May 31, 2007, 2:29 pm |
| Use VLANs to limit Multicasting | March 14, 2008, 12:22 pm |
| Security of multiple VLANs and WiFi | March 3, 2005, 5:53 pm |

Mac address and VLAns
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 








>
>