Hobby Electronics Basics oscilloscope bandwidth question

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
oscilloscope bandwidth question newsgroupie2003 01-09-06
Posted by on January 9, 2006, 7:06 pm
Please log in for more thread options


Hi,
I am looking at buying a cheap scope, thinking og the Velleman hps10
or hps40.
The specs for the hps40 says 40 MS/s sampling rate ans 12 MHz analogue
bandwidth.
What exactly does that mean?
I though a 40 MS rate would give a 20 MHz BW, at least for periodical
signals.
I am a PIC novice and wanted the meter to monitor logic levels and
serial data transmission, is that a bad idea?
Thanks
Soren


Posted by David L. Jones on January 10, 2006, 12:29 am
Please log in for more thread options


newsgroupie2003@yahoo.dk wrote:
> Hi,
> I am looking at buying a cheap scope, thinking og the Velleman hps10
> or hps40.
> The specs for the hps40 says 40 MS/s sampling rate ans 12 MHz analogue
> bandwidth.
> What exactly does that mean?
> I though a 40 MS rate would give a 20 MHz BW, at least for periodical
> signals.

That is only to avoid aliasing on the ADC.
The sample rate really has nothing to do with sampling repetitive
signals on a Digital scope like this.
A DSO could have a 40MS/s sample rate but have a 1GHz bandwidth. It
does this by sampling the signal over many many cycles, and this is
what the Velleman might do at high bandwidths. This is known as
"repetitive sampling" mode.
This mode is useless for "single shot" applications like capturing the
serial data transmission as you want. In this case you want "real-time"
single shot mode. In the case of the Velleman at maximum sample rate it
will take 40MS/s. If you viewed a 10MHz waveform in this mode you would
get *4* sample points on the screen which is obviously fairly useless
to you. As a rule of thumb, in real-time mode you'll want at least 10
samples per cycle to get an idea of what your waveform is like. That
means your 40MS/s 12MHz bandwidth scope will have a useful "real-time"
bandwidth of 4MHz displaying 10 point per cycle. I'd personally round
it down to about 1MHz.

Also, the sample memory in the Velleman is likely to be small (256-512
samples maybe?). This doesn't give you much detail in your single shot
waveform capture.

The 12MHz quoted is the bandwidth of the analog input amplifiers, it
has nothing to do with the sample rate.

> I am a PIC novice and wanted the meter to monitor logic levels and
> serial data transmission, is that a bad idea?

It should be OK for that, so long as you don't want to see more than
say a dozen bytes of serial data at once. To see more you need a DSO
with a much bigger sample memory.

Dave :)


Posted by redbelly on January 10, 2006, 5:25 am
Please log in for more thread options


David L. Jones wrote:

> The 12MHz quoted is the bandwidth of the analog input amplifiers, it
> has nothing to do with the sample rate.

I'll just add, for the benefit of the OP, that the "analog bandwidth"
is the frequency at which a sine wave is reduced to about 70% of its
actual amplitude. (More precisely the factor is the square root of 1/2)

Mark


Posted by on February 2, 2006, 7:24 pm
Please log in for more thread options


Thanks for that to you all!
I had newer heard of repetitive sampling mode.
In the mean time i bought the oscilloscope (almost =BD price in the US
cmp. to Oz) and for the price and aplication i am happy with it. One
thing that does puzzle my is why they did not put a little more memory
in. as you say David, the stoage is a few hundred points. It seems
like a cheap feature to build in a little extra mem and greatly amplify
the use of the scope, but i guess Velleman has their resons.

Thanks!

Soren
David L. Jones wrote:
> newsgroupie2003@yahoo.dk wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am looking at buying a cheap scope, thinking og the Velleman hps10
> > or hps40.
> > The specs for the hps40 says 40 MS/s sampling rate ans 12 MHz analogue
> > bandwidth.
> > What exactly does that mean?
> > I though a 40 MS rate would give a 20 MHz BW, at least for periodical
> > signals.
>
> That is only to avoid aliasing on the ADC.
> The sample rate really has nothing to do with sampling repetitive
> signals on a Digital scope like this.
> A DSO could have a 40MS/s sample rate but have a 1GHz bandwidth. It
> does this by sampling the signal over many many cycles, and this is
> what the Velleman might do at high bandwidths. This is known as
> "repetitive sampling" mode.
> This mode is useless for "single shot" applications like capturing the
> serial data transmission as you want. In this case you want "real-time"
> single shot mode. In the case of the Velleman at maximum sample rate it
> will take 40MS/s. If you viewed a 10MHz waveform in this mode you would
> get *4* sample points on the screen which is obviously fairly useless
> to you. As a rule of thumb, in real-time mode you'll want at least 10
> samples per cycle to get an idea of what your waveform is like. That
> means your 40MS/s 12MHz bandwidth scope will have a useful "real-time"
> bandwidth of 4MHz displaying 10 point per cycle. I'd personally round
> it down to about 1MHz.
>
> Also, the sample memory in the Velleman is likely to be small (256-512
> samples maybe?). This doesn't give you much detail in your single shot
> waveform capture.
>
> The 12MHz quoted is the bandwidth of the analog input amplifiers, it
> has nothing to do with the sample rate.
>
> > I am a PIC novice and wanted the meter to monitor logic levels and
> > serial data transmission, is that a bad idea?
>
> It should be OK for that, so long as you don't want to see more than
> say a dozen bytes of serial data at once. To see more you need a DSO
> with a much bigger sample memory.
>=20
> Dave :)


Posted by David L. Jones on February 2, 2006, 8:46 pm
Please log in for more thread options


newsgroupie2003@yahoo.dk wrote:
> Thanks for that to you all!
> I had newer heard of repetitive sampling mode.
> In the mean time i bought the oscilloscope (almost =BD price in the US
> cmp. to Oz) and for the price and aplication i am happy with it. One
> thing that does puzzle my is why they did not put a little more memory
> in. as you say David, the stoage is a few hundred points. It seems
> like a cheap feature to build in a little extra mem and greatly amplify
> the use of the scope, but i guess Velleman has their resons.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Soren

The reason for the lack of memory is most likely a combination of
several factors:
1) They are building to a low price point, so a few dollars extra
manufacturing cost here and there can make a big difference to the
final resale price.

2) The screen is only small, so it kinda makes sense just to have
enough memory to fill the resolution of the screen. For the intended
target market (service people who just want to see a basic waveform on
the screen) that is probably good enough. It also means you don't have
to develop the pan & zoom software functionality required, thus getting
them to market quicker etc.

3) The design architecture is probably based on a low end FPGA and they
would have used the internal SRAM to store the data, eliminating the
need for high speed external memory. Most low end FPGA's have very
limited SRAM.

Dave :)


Similar ThreadsPosted
oscilloscope bandwidth question January 9, 2006, 7:06 pm
Oscilloscope question September 13, 2008, 11:14 am
Beginning Oscilloscope Question May 4, 2007, 8:30 pm
Oscilloscope newbie question May 18, 2007, 8:35 am
Bandwidth of neon xfmr January 27, 2005, 7:38 pm
bandwidth and rise time May 4, 2005, 4:47 pm
bandwidth and rise time May 26, 2005, 6:07 pm
Gain bandwidth product April 28, 2007, 11:11 am
Receiver sensitivity and IF bandwidth?? October 23, 2007, 12:30 am
bandwidth and high gain amplifier May 4, 2005, 3:46 am
Detuning/widening bandwidth of piezo transducer? October 27, 2005, 10:26 pm
Re: Bandwidth importance on a scope for digital electronics December 6, 2007, 2:14 pm
Re: Bandwidth importance on a scope for digital electronics December 6, 2007, 8:12 pm
CRT monitor query: Relationship between video input bandwidth and refresh rate/resolution settings possible... April 14, 2006, 4:59 am
Oscilloscope FAQ June 20, 2005, 9:14 am