Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by on July 1, 2008, 2:30 pm
Please log in for more thread options http://www.national.com/ds.cgi/LM/LM1875.pdf and I noticed that they do have a schematic for a single supply (as opposed to a +/- supply). If running on a single supply, does the chip amplifer consume significant power during quiet tracks? Would this be pretty much the same as running the amplifier in Class A mode (vs. Class AB)? I'm trying to figure out if I really need a +/- power supply, or if I can just go with a single supply (easier to build). Thanks, Michael | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Don Bowey on July 1, 2008, 2:48 pm
Please log in for more thread options a1662fad-e0d7-4306-9e20-195abb1e7311@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com, The datasheet does have a "Typical Single Supply Operation" schematic. Have another look. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by on July 1, 2008, 2:55 pm
Please log in for more thread options > On 7/1/08 11:30 AM, in article
> a1662fad-e0d7-4306-9e20-195abb1e7...@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com, > > > > > I was reading the datasheet for the LM1875
> >http://www.national.com/ds.cgi/LM/LM1875.pdf >
> > and I noticed that they do have a schematic for a single supply (as
> > opposed to a +/- supply). >
> > If running on a single supply, does the chip amplifer consume
> > significant power during quiet tracks? >
> > Would this be pretty much the same as running the amplifier in Class A
> > mode (vs. Class AB)? >
> > I'm trying to figure out if I really need a +/- power supply, or if I
> > can just go with a single supply (easier to build). >
> > Thanks,
>
> > Michael
>
> The datasheet does have a "Typical Single Supply Operation" schematic. > Have another look. Yes, that's what I said. There is a schematic. It's on Page 2. (amused grin) Michael | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by John Fields on July 1, 2008, 3:15 pm
Please log in for more thread options On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 11:55:35 -0700 (PDT), mrdarrett@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 7/1/08 11:30 AM, in article
>> a1662fad-e0d7-4306-9e20-195abb1e7...@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com, >> >> >> >> > I was reading the datasheet for the LM1875
>> >http://www.national.com/ds.cgi/LM/LM1875.pdf >>
>> > and I noticed that they do have a schematic for a single supply (as
>> > opposed to a +/- supply). >>
>> > If running on a single supply, does the chip amplifer consume
>> > significant power during quiet tracks? >>
>> > Would this be pretty much the same as running the amplifier in Class A
>> > mode (vs. Class AB)? >>
>> > I'm trying to figure out if I really need a +/- power supply, or if I
>> > can just go with a single supply (easier to build). >>
>> > Thanks,
>>
>> > Michael
>>
>> The datasheet does have a "Typical Single Supply Operation" schematic. >> Have another look. >
> >Yes, that's what I said. There is a schematic. It's on Page 2. >(amused grin) --- Look at "Supply Current" on page 2 and read: "Power Dissipation and Heat Sinking" on page 6. JF | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by on July 1, 2008, 4:30 pm
Please log in for more thread options > On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 11:55:35 -0700 (PDT), mrdarr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On 7/1/08 11:30 AM, in article
> >> a1662fad-e0d7-4306-9e20-195abb1e7...@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com, >
> >> > I was reading the datasheet for the LM1875
> >> >http://www.national.com/ds.cgi/LM/LM1875.pdf >
> >> > and I noticed that they do have a schematic for a single supply (as
> >> > opposed to a +/- supply). >
> >> > If running on a single supply, does the chip amplifer consume
> >> > significant power during quiet tracks? >
> >> > Would this be pretty much the same as running the amplifier in Class A
> >> > mode (vs. Class AB)? >
> >> > I'm trying to figure out if I really need a +/- power supply, or if I
> >> > can just go with a single supply (easier to build). >
> >> > Thanks,
>
> >> > Michael
>
> >> The datasheet does have a "Typical Single Supply Operation" schematic.
> >> Have another look. >
> >Yes, that's what I said. There is a schematic. It's on Page 2.
> >(amused grin) >
> --- > Look at "Supply Current" on page 2 and read: "Power Dissipation and > Heat Sinking" on page 6. > > JF Ah, so apparently the chip does not use more power with a single supply than with a +/- supply. Is there any reason why I should NOT use a single supply with this chip? Thanks, Michael | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| LM1875 on a single supply | July 1, 2008, 2:30 pm |
| Using a single power supply for dual supply "Sample and Hold" | October 24, 2005, 3:26 pm |
| Converting dual or balanced supply circuit to single supply? | June 19, 2007, 10:46 am |
| Single supply and split / dual supply | July 26, 2007, 10:55 am |
| Single Supply Op-Amp | October 30, 2004, 7:26 pm |
| single supply opamp | March 27, 2005, 8:44 pm |
| +/- supply frm single chip | August 19, 2006, 3:05 am |
| 60 amp single pahese 240 volt AC supply (UK) | November 25, 2005, 9:30 pm |
| General purpose single-supply op-amp? | April 1, 2007, 10:32 am |
| Single supply opamp calculations | June 18, 2007, 3:02 pm |
| Half-wave rectifier opamp in single supply | June 22, 2007, 4:27 pm |
| Using a single resistor with several LEDs | July 31, 2004, 4:39 am |
| Signals on a single wire | April 3, 2005, 4:07 pm |
| window comparator using a single op-amp | May 7, 2005, 9:41 pm |
| window comparator using a single op-amp | May 8, 2005, 7:41 am |

LM1875 on a single supply
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 







> http://www.national.com/ds.cgi/LM/LM1875.pdf
>
> and I noticed that they do have a schematic for a single supply (as
> opposed to a +/- supply).
>
> If running on a single supply, does the chip amplifer consume
> significant power during quiet tracks?
>
> Would this be pretty much the same as running the amplifier in Class A
> mode (vs. Class AB)?
>
> I'm trying to figure out if I really need a +/- power supply, or if I
> can just go with a single supply (easier to build).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael