Hobby Electronics Basics Justification for the need for high voltage/power Class D amplifiers

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Justification for the need for high voltage/power Class D amplifiers Matthew 11-16-04
Posted by Matthew on November 16, 2004, 1:00 am
Please log in for more thread options
Hi,

I am doing a study in Class D power driver. Currently, reviewing the
market feasibility. However, I have some questions.

1) What is the purpose of designing high voltage Class D power driver
if it is not for portable devices? Isn't a Class AB enough to meet
such requirements?

2) In what ways and why will Class D replace Class AB in the future?

I understand that Class D has the following advantages:

a)Compactness of overall design;
b)Lower heat dissipation/high efficiency;
c)Cost saving
d)Energy saving

Are there any other compelling reasons that Class D will replace Class
AB?

Appreciate any help.

Thanks.


Posted by Kevin Aylward on November 16, 2004, 9:54 am
Please log in for more thread options
Matthew wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am doing a study in Class D power driver. Currently, reviewing the
> market feasibility. However, I have some questions.
>
> 1) What is the purpose of designing high voltage Class D power driver
> if it is not for portable devices? Isn't a Class AB enough to meet
> such requirements?

One application is high power pro audio gear. Once you get into the 1kW+
range it starts making better sense.

>
> 2) In what ways and why will Class D replace Class AB in the future?

It won't.

>
> I understand that Class D has the following advantages:
>
> a)Compactness of overall design;

There is little correlation between physical size and method. In fact,
Class D usually requires more complicated circuitry to obtain decent
performance.

> b)Lower heat dissipation/high efficiency;
> c)Cost saving
> d)Energy saving
>
> Are there any other compelling reasons that Class D will replace Class
> AB?

There aren't any compelling reasons for class D. Its just another method
that had advantages in some situations, and disadvantages in others.
Class D wont replace the other methods it is used in addition to the
other methods.

If your doing a study your supposed to identify the disadvantages as
well as the advantages. You seem to be assuming the Class D is god's
gift to amplifiers from the outset. It isn't.

Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.




Posted by john jardine on November 17, 2004, 4:28 am
Please log in for more thread options

> Matthew wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> If your doing a study your supposed to identify the disadvantages as
> well as the advantages. You seem to be assuming the Class D is god's
> gift to amplifiers from the outset. It isn't.
>
> Kevin Aylward
> salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
> http://www.anasoft.co.uk
> SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
> Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
> Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
>
Off hand it smacks of homework.
They're probably also indoctrinating 'em that digital will always replace
analogue and that nothing worthy is designed below 10GHz and that microsoft
is the best thing since sliced bread.
regards
john




Posted by rayjking on November 17, 2004, 3:24 am
Please log in for more thread options
Matthew,

The efficiency is better but a close second is crossover distortion. True
Class D has no cross over distortion also the design is more simple over
the temperature range because one fet is switched full on or off.

Ray




> Hi,
>
> I am doing a study in Class D power driver. Currently, reviewing the
> market feasibility. However, I have some questions.
>
> 1) What is the purpose of designing high voltage Class D power driver
> if it is not for portable devices? Isn't a Class AB enough to meet
> such requirements?
>
> 2) In what ways and why will Class D replace Class AB in the future?
>
> I understand that Class D has the following advantages:
>
> a)Compactness of overall design;
> b)Lower heat dissipation/high efficiency;
> c)Cost saving
> d)Energy saving
>
> Are there any other compelling reasons that Class D will replace Class
> AB?
>
> Appreciate any help.
>
> Thanks.




Posted by rayjking on November 17, 2004, 12:52 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Matthew,
Correction to my post. The other advantage to a switcher vs AB is the
voltage rating of the switch and size of the out put transformer along with
the power loss due to the bias current in the output transformer.
a very good pwm can be made with two 555s and one IR2111. driving two
totempole N fets.

Ray

> Matthew,
>
> The efficiency is better but a close second is crossover distortion. True
> Class D has no cross over distortion also the design is more simple over
> the temperature range because one fet is switched full on or off.
>
> Ray
>
>
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am doing a study in Class D power driver. Currently, reviewing the
> > market feasibility. However, I have some questions.
> >
> > 1) What is the purpose of designing high voltage Class D power driver
> > if it is not for portable devices? Isn't a Class AB enough to meet
> > such requirements?
> >
> > 2) In what ways and why will Class D replace Class AB in the future?
> >
> > I understand that Class D has the following advantages:
> >
> > a)Compactness of overall design;
> > b)Lower heat dissipation/high efficiency;
> > c)Cost saving
> > d)Energy saving
> >
> > Are there any other compelling reasons that Class D will replace Class
> > AB?
> >
> > Appreciate any help.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
>




Similar ThreadsPosted
Justification for the need for high voltage/power Class D amplifiers November 16, 2004, 1:00 am
Re: Empirical Beliefs & Hypothesis; Do they terminate in some beliefs that need no further justification, go on infinitely - on belief being justified by other that then need justification, or circle back upon itself in some way - constituting a sort of August 21, 2008, 2:21 pm
Re: Empirical Beliefs & Hypothesis; Do they terminate in some beliefs that need no further justification, go on infinitely - on belief being justified by other that then need justification, or circle back upon itself in some way - constituting a sort o August 21, 2008, 2:27 pm
Re: Empirical Beliefs & Hypothesis; Do they terminate in some beliefs that need no further justification, go on infinitely - on belief being justified by other that then need justification, or circle back upon itself in some way - constituting a sort o August 21, 2008, 7:14 pm
Re: Empirical Beliefs & Hypothesis; Do they terminate in some beliefs that need no further justification, go on infinitely - on belief being justified by other that then need justification, or circle back upon itself in some way - constituting a sort o August 22, 2008, 12:26 am
Re: Empirical Beliefs & Hypothesis; Do they terminate in some beliefs that need no further justification, go on infinitely - on belief being justified by other that then need justification, or circle back upon itself in some way - constituting a sort o August 22, 2008, 12:40 am
Re: Empirical Beliefs & Hypothesis; Do they terminate in some beliefs that need no further justification, go on infinitely - on belief being justified by other that then need justification, or circle back upon itself in some way - constituting a sort o August 22, 2008, 1:24 am
Re: Empirical Beliefs & Hypothesis; Do they terminate in some beliefs that need no further justification, go on infinitely - on belief being justified by other that then need justification, or circle back upon itself in some way - constituting a sort o August 22, 2008, 3:29 am
Re: Empirical Beliefs & Hypothesis; Do they terminate in some beliefs that need no further justification, go on infinitely - on belief being justified by other that then need justification, or circle back upon itself in some way - constituting a sort o August 23, 2008, 12:53 pm
Re: Empirical Beliefs & Hypothesis; Do they terminate in some beliefs that need no further justification, go on infinitely - on belief being justified by other that then need justification, or circle back upon itself in some way - constituting a sort o August 23, 2008, 12:56 pm
ABOUT Amplifiers June 28, 2005, 5:48 am
Amplifiers June 29, 2005, 4:36 am
amplifiers June 25, 2008, 3:15 am
whither regenerative amplifiers? October 28, 2004, 6:34 pm
Valve amplifiers April 1, 2005, 10:34 pm