Re: Scare of the day...
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
Posted by John Larkin on June 27, 2008, 12:46 pm
Please log in for more thread options You snipped half of it. The 2nd amendment is the worst-written part of the Constitution; it's horribly ambiguous. John | ||||
|
Posted by Nico Coesel on June 27, 2008, 1:36 pm
Please log in for more thread options >On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:46:57 -0700, John Larkin
> >>On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:57:12 -0700, Jim Thompson
>> >>>Scare of the day...
>>> >>>The clearly written 2nd Amendment: >>> >>>"The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed" >>> >>>yesterday was _almost_ trashed by the leftist weenies on the Supreme >>>Court. >>> >>>Fortunately, by a 5:4 decision, the leftist weenies were NOT able to >>>trash one of the most fundamental rights guaranteed to us under our >>>wonderfully written Constitution. >>
>>You snipped half of it. The 2nd amendment is the worst-written part of >>the Constitution; it's horribly ambiguous. >> >>John >> >
>What is it about "_right_of_the_people_" that you don't understand? > >Why is it that the cities with the most restrictive gun laws have the >highest crime rates? Because there is a lot to steel. >And those towns that _require_ homeowner gun ownership have virtually
>no crime? Because there is nothing to steel except for an old rifle. -- Programmeren in Almere? E-mail naar nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.) | ||||
|
Posted by Nico Coesel on June 27, 2008, 5:14 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:36:09 GMT, nico@puntnl.niks (Nico Coesel)
>wrote: > >>
>>>On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:46:57 -0700, John Larkin
>>> >>>>On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:57:12 -0700, Jim Thompson >>>> >>>>>Scare of the day... >>>>> >>>>>The clearly written 2nd Amendment: >>>>> >>>>>"The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed" >>>>> >>>>>yesterday was _almost_ trashed by the leftist weenies on the Supreme >>>>>Court. >>>>> >>>>>Fortunately, by a 5:4 decision, the leftist weenies were NOT able to >>>>>trash one of the most fundamental rights guaranteed to us under our >>>>>wonderfully written Constitution. >>>> >>>>You snipped half of it. The 2nd amendment is the worst-written part of >>>>the Constitution; it's horribly ambiguous. >>>> >>>>John >>>> >>> >>>What is it about "_right_of_the_people_" that you don't understand? >>> >>>Why is it that the cities with the most restrictive gun laws have the >>>highest crime rates? >>
>>Because there is a lot to steel. >
>What? Crime happens because there's a STEEL mill ?:-) Rewrite your sentence above in Dutch and I admit I made a stupid spelling error :-) I meant to type 'steal'. >>
>>>And those towns that _require_ homeowner gun ownership have virtually
>>>no crime? >>
>>Because there is nothing to steel except for an old rifle. >
>Yup. That indeed may be the metal the rifle is made from ;-) > >Make my day... kick a leftist weenie's ass ;-) Kicking an environmentalist's ass makes my day :-) -- Programmeren in Almere? E-mail naar nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.) | ||||
|
Posted by JosephKK on June 30, 2008, 6:55 am
Please log in for more thread options On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:14:38 GMT, nico@puntnl.niks (Nico Coesel)
wrote: >
>>On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:36:09 GMT, nico@puntnl.niks (Nico Coesel)
>>wrote: >> >>>
>>>>On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:46:57 -0700, John Larkin >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:57:12 -0700, Jim Thompson >>>>> >>>>>>Scare of the day... >>>>>> >>>>>>The clearly written 2nd Amendment: >>>>>> >>>>>>"The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed" >>>>>> >>>>>>yesterday was _almost_ trashed by the leftist weenies on the Supreme >>>>>>Court. >>>>>> >>>>>>Fortunately, by a 5:4 decision, the leftist weenies were NOT able to >>>>>>trash one of the most fundamental rights guaranteed to us under our >>>>>>wonderfully written Constitution. >>>>> >>>>>You snipped half of it. The 2nd amendment is the worst-written part of >>>>>the Constitution; it's horribly ambiguous. >>>>> >>>>>John >>>>> >>>> >>>>What is it about "_right_of_the_people_" that you don't understand? >>>> >>>>Why is it that the cities with the most restrictive gun laws have the >>>>highest crime rates? >>> >>>Because there is a lot to steel. >>
>>What? Crime happens because there's a STEEL mill ?:-) >
>Rewrite your sentence above in Dutch and I admit I made a stupid >spelling error :-) I meant to type 'steal'. Ah fudge. I was hoping that you were intentionally punning. >
>>>
>>>>And those towns that _require_ homeowner gun ownership have virtually >>>>no crime? >>> >>>Because there is nothing to steel except for an old rifle. >>
>>Yup. That indeed may be the metal the rifle is made from ;-) >> >>Make my day... kick a leftist weenie's ass ;-) >
>Kicking an environmentalist's ass makes my day :-) | ||||
|
Posted by JeffM on June 27, 2008, 1:44 pm
Please log in for more thread options Jim Thompson wrote:
>>>yesterday was _almost_ trashed
Jim Thompson wrote:
>>>by the leftist weenies on the Supreme Court. >>> >Why is it that the cities with the most restrictive gun laws
>have the highest crime rates? > >And those towns that _require_ homeowner gun ownership >have virtually no crime? There was a made-for-TV movie that explored this subject. "The Right of the People" (1986) http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:UwJBYDptQOsJ:www.imdb.com/title/tt0091857+we+After.a.horrific.shooting.incident+a.small.town.votes.to.allow.a.mass.arming.of.the.citizenry+every-*-*-spat-*-*-*-*-*+liberalized+drop I find the use of the word "liberalized" there ironic. I note a difference between *town* and *big city* --especially the **teeming masses** part. I'm interested to see how this works out for D.C. and to see if the model scales like you think it will. I'm thinking this will be yet another black mark on Dubya's legacy. | ||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Re: Scare of the day... | June 27, 2008, 12:46 pm |
| Re: Scare of the day... | June 27, 2008, 4:13 pm |
| Re: Scare of the day... | June 27, 2008, 4:15 pm |
| Re: Scare of the day... | June 27, 2008, 6:04 pm |
| Re: Scare of the day... | July 1, 2008, 8:05 pm |
| Re: Scare of the day... | July 1, 2008, 8:46 pm |
| Re: Scare of the day... | July 1, 2008, 10:35 pm |
| Re: Scare of the day... | July 4, 2008, 8:55 am |
| Re: Scare of the day... | July 5, 2008, 12:11 am |
| OT: Tsunami Scare | June 15, 2005, 11:23 am |
| OT: Big Medical Scare | March 3, 2007, 10:06 am |
| Re: Big Monitor Scare. (HP L2335) (Wireless/GSM interference ?!?!?) | August 11, 2008, 12:38 am |
| Circuitry Ideas (Help me scare the crap out of "ghost hunters") | October 10, 2005, 12:41 am |
>
>The clearly written 2nd Amendment:
>
>"The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed"
>
>yesterday was _almost_ trashed by the leftist weenies on the Supreme
>Court.
>
>Fortunately, by a 5:4 decision, the leftist weenies were NOT able to
>trash one of the most fundamental rights guaranteed to us under our
>wonderfully written Constitution.