Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Joerg on October 24, 2007, 4:34 pm
Please log in for more thread options After some Google searching and perusing the sites of the usual contenders I only found one uC family that has serious on-chip RF transceiver capabilities, the Cypress CYWUSB6953 and its brethren. rfPICs and others usually only have a transmitter. Anyhow, the Cypress will only serve 2.45GHz but I need the lower UHF bands for range reasons. Is anything coming down the pike soon or will that have to remain a two-chip solution? -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by donald on October 24, 2007, 8:04 pm
Please log in for more thread options don | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Joerg on October 24, 2007, 9:13 pm
Please log in for more thread options donald wrote:
> Joerg wrote:
> >> Hello Folks,
>> >> After some Google searching and perusing the sites of the usual >> contenders I only found one uC family that has serious on-chip RF >> transceiver capabilities, the Cypress CYWUSB6953 and its brethren. >> rfPICs and others usually only have a transmitter. >> >> Anyhow, the Cypress will only serve 2.45GHz but I need the lower UHF >> bands for range reasons. Is anything coming down the pike soon or will >> that have to remain a two-chip solution? >> > How about CC1110F32 from TI.
> Thanks, Don! How could I have missed that? I was looking at lots of CC11xx datasheets today. Five bucks is a bit highish but would work in this case. I guess the programmers will throw tomatoes when I suggest that. It's a 8051 core (I love the 8051...) For some reason TI's server was choking a lot today. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by donald on October 24, 2007, 10:21 pm
Please log in for more thread options Joerg wrote:
> donald wrote:
> >> Joerg wrote:
>> >>> Hello Folks,
>>> >>> After some Google searching and perusing the sites of the usual >>> contenders I only found one uC family that has serious on-chip RF >>> transceiver capabilities, the Cypress CYWUSB6953 and its brethren. >>> rfPICs and others usually only have a transmitter. >>> >>> Anyhow, the Cypress will only serve 2.45GHz but I need the lower UHF >>> bands for range reasons. Is anything coming down the pike soon or >>> will that have to remain a two-chip solution? >>> >> How about CC1110F32 from TI.
>> >
I've been looking at useing this myself.
> Thanks, Don! How could I have missed that? I was looking at lots of > CC11xx datasheets today. Five bucks is a bit highish but would work in > this case. I guess the programmers will throw tomatoes when I suggest > that. It's a 8051 core (I love the 8051...) > > For some reason TI's server was choking a lot today. > don | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by larwe on October 24, 2007, 10:24 pm
Please log in for more thread options wrote:
> > How about CC1110F32 from TI.
>
> Thanks, Don! How could I have missed that? I was looking at lots of > CC11xx datasheets today. Five bucks is a bit highish but would work in You should consider this part limited lifespan IMHO precisely because of the 51 core. Remember Chipcon is now owned by TI. I would say if your design horizon exceeds 3~4 years it would be better not to pick this part. What part of the spectrum are you trying to cover; 433MHz? 860-ish? Quite a few solutions aimed at markets like RKE. For example Atmel covers certain frequencies from 315 to 915MHz ASK/FSK selectable. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Micro controllers with UHF transceivers?
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 








>
> After some Google searching and perusing the sites of the usual
> contenders I only found one uC family that has serious on-chip RF
> transceiver capabilities, the Cypress CYWUSB6953 and its brethren.
> rfPICs and others usually only have a transmitter.
>
> Anyhow, the Cypress will only serve 2.45GHz but I need the lower UHF
> bands for range reasons. Is anything coming down the pike soon or will
> that have to remain a two-chip solution?
>