Electronics Design Contact resistance

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Contact resistance Yzordderrex 07-03-08
| ---> Re: Contact resistance Archimedes' Lev...07-03-08
| `--> Re: Contact resistance Archimedes' Lev...07-03-08
Posted by Yzordderrex on July 3, 2008, 12:38 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Greetings,

I am using a gold pogo pin to make contact in a 2amp application. The
metal it is in contact with is stainless steel. I am measuring 0.12
ohms across the interface. Does this seem correct? I would like to
know if anyone has a link to a paper which would discuss this. I
might have to take a look at changing the stainless to something else.

regards,
Bob
N9NEO

Posted by on July 3, 2008, 5:43 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> Greetings,
>
> I am using a gold pogo pin to make contact in a 2amp application. The
> metal it is in contact with is stainless steel. I am measuring 0.12
> ohms across the interface. Does this seem correct? I would like to
> know if anyone has a link to a paper which would discuss this. I
> might have to take a look at changing the stainless to something else.
>
> regards,
> Bob
> N9NEO

What method are you using to measure the resistance? Hopefully not an
ohm meter alone. I can't say 0.12 ohm is correct but at 2-amps that's
a 0.24v drop. How about getting 4-clip leads, a constant current
source and a voltmeter and make a 4-point measurement. Tie the current
source to the pogo pin and the steel plate, connect the voltmeter to
the pogo and steel plate near the point of pogo contact then touch
the pogo to the steel plate and measure the voltage. Apply ohms law
and determine the resistance. If the measurement point is away from
the point of contact you may be measuring the resistance of the steel
plate. Perhaps you could apply multiple pogo's and/or a sensing scheme
to minimize the losses.

good luck!
al

Posted by DaveM on July 3, 2008, 6:57 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I am using a gold pogo pin to make contact in a 2amp application. The
>> metal it is in contact with is stainless steel. I am measuring 0.12
>> ohms across the interface. Does this seem correct? I would like to
>> know if anyone has a link to a paper which would discuss this. I
>> might have to take a look at changing the stainless to something else.
>>
>> regards,
>> Bob
>> N9NEO
>
> What method are you using to measure the resistance? Hopefully not an
> ohm meter alone. I can't say 0.12 ohm is correct but at 2-amps that's
> a 0.24v drop. How about getting 4-clip leads, a constant current
> source and a voltmeter and make a 4-point measurement. Tie the current
> source to the pogo pin and the steel plate, connect the voltmeter to
> the pogo and steel plate near the point of pogo contact then touch
> the pogo to the steel plate and measure the voltage. Apply ohms law
> and determine the resistance. If the measurement point is away from
> the point of contact you may be measuring the resistance of the steel
> plate. Perhaps you could apply multiple pogo's and/or a sensing scheme
> to minimize the losses.
>
> good luck!
> al

What kind of pogo pins are you using? If they're needle points, then it's
possible that they don't have enough pressure to dimple the stainless plate
adequately to lower the resistance. Two amps is a bit much to push through a
needle point contacting a hard surface.
Possible to use a round tip pogo pin??... more contact area and higher pressure
pins might help.

--
Dave M
MasonDG44 at comcast dot net (Just substitute the appropriate characters in the
address)

Experience: What you get when you don't get what you want



Posted by on July 3, 2008, 9:24 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> Greetings,
>
> I am using a gold pogo pin to make contact in a 2amp application. =A0The
> metal it is in contact with is stainless steel. =A0I am measuring 0.12
> ohms across the interface. =A0Does this seem correct? =A0I would like to
> know if anyone has a link to a paper which would discuss this. =A0I
> might have to take a look at changing the stainless to something else.

Stainless steel is stainless because it is covered with a coherent
layer of not-all-that-conductive chromium oxide - 0.12 ohms sounds
very like the sort of resistance levels that caused me to dump
stainless steel electrodes in a conductivity meter and go for
platinum.

For you application gold would be traditional. Printed circuit
manufacturers used to routinely selectively plate a micron or so of
hard gold onto the contact fingers on plug in printed circuit boards.
Even that couldn't take enough pressure to force metal-to-metal
contact through the gold sulphide that builds up - someone had to
polish the connector pins every six months or so to keep the contacts
reliable - and two part connectors eventually took over.

Pogo pins do provide enough force but they will probably wreck the
target surface if you make contact more than a few hundred times,
which is plenty for production testing (where they are normally used).

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

Posted by Archimedes' Lever on July 3, 2008, 11:04 pm
Please log in for more thread options
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 18:24:49 -0700 (PDT), bill.sloman@ieee.org wrote:

>Stainless steel is stainless because it is covered with a coherent
>layer of not-all-that-conductive chromium oxide

Stainless gets abrasively polished. Any coating placed on the raw stock
before polishing gets abraded off. Everything that stainless is, is
throughout the alloy matrix that makes up the medium.

> - 0.12 ohms sounds
>very like the sort of resistance levels that caused me to dump
>stainless steel electrodes in a conductivity meter and go for
>platinum.


He should go by a set of lawn mower engine points. Easy to find and
nice-n-cheap. Both contacts are platinum plated, which NEVER oxidizes,
and is the proper point contact medium if longevity is a concern. All
that would be needed then is an actuation mechanism.

Similar ThreadsPosted
Contact resistance July 3, 2008, 12:38 pm
soi body contact August 31, 2005, 6:10 am
body contact March 31, 2006, 1:02 am
Need to contact Frank Kalcevik December 31, 2004, 4:53 pm
CONTACT.!! PLANCK aliens.!! December 5, 2005, 9:28 pm
PLANCK alien CONTACT c.!! December 6, 2005, 3:12 pm
contact pressure sensor June 20, 2006, 12:07 pm
Skin contact loading June 6, 2007, 3:49 am
Making Contact with a AAA Cell September 10, 2007, 2:43 am
Indictive currents on relay contact July 19, 2005, 12:20 am
Contact Closure Frequency Counter December 26, 2005, 7:11 am
Re: Sensing AC voltage by non-contact means. January 19, 2006, 3:30 am
Sensing AC voltage by non-contact means. January 16, 2006, 6:40 am
Contact breaker sizing for boiler February 13, 2007, 11:51 am
Switch Contact Rating Question April 7, 2007, 8:01 am