why cisco 2950 switch is called as catalyst switch
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by mohitbakre on December 8, 2006, 10:40 am
Please log in for more thread options actually i want to know why do we call a cisco 2950 switch as catalyst switch. why we use the word ( catalyst ). | ||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Walter Roberson on December 8, 2006, 11:12 am
Please log in for more thread options http://groups.google.ca/group/comp.dcom.sys.cisco/browse_thread/thread/664f0083eaf22b9a/4f95e0dad2b5e3e2 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by brink on December 9, 2006, 2:19 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Walter Roberson schreef: > >hi ,
> >actually i want to know why do we call a cisco 2950 switch as catalyst > >switch. > >why we use the word ( catalyst ). >
http://groups.google.ca/group/comp.dcom.sys.cisco/browse_thread/thread/664f0083eaf22b9a/4f95e0dad2b5e3e2
> While hesitating to disagree with Brad Reese, the name originated with Crescendo which Cisco acquired in '93, see http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/1994/prod_022894.html The first Cisco Catalyst was the 1200, which even did (limited) L3. | ||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by www.BradReese.Com on December 9, 2006, 9:25 pm
Please log in for more thread options Excellent Brink, stand corrected.
In 2006, the Cisco Catalyst Switch reached a milestone with cumulative sales totaling $20 Billion. Once more Brink, thank you for the correction. Sincerely and gratefully yours, Brad Reese http://www.BradReese.Com | ||||||||||||||||
>actually i want to know why do we call a cisco 2950 switch as catalyst
>switch.
>why we use the word ( catalyst ).