|
|
|
Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
|||||||
|
Posted by Sam Wilson on August 30, 2007, 11:28 am
Please log in for more thread options
in after all connections have ceased or have timed out. With a dynamic NAT pool with a large number of short-ish term systems active this suggests that most of the addresses in the pool will spend most of their time waiting for a timeout (and forcing further users in an overflow PAT pool if one is configured), or will an address be reused if there are no connections currently on that translation? If the former is the case are there any guidelines or BCP on whether and how to reduce the xlate timeout? Thanks, Sam | |||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| timeout xlate BCP | August 30, 2007, 11:28 am |
| No xlate errors | September 26, 2006, 1:12 pm |
| pix static xlate doesn't trigger | December 12, 2005, 4:32 pm |
| PIX 515 - to static map users or let XLATE deal with them? | January 23, 2007, 9:21 am |
| PIX problem - clear xlate fixes connectivity | October 15, 2005, 5:36 pm |
| FWSM: Strange xlate and lost connectivity | October 9, 2007, 6:22 am |
| FIN Timeout | August 26, 2005, 1:18 pm |
| VPN Timeout | October 18, 2005, 1:57 pm |
| NAT timeout | June 6, 2006, 3:01 pm |
| Cisco SDM timeout | April 19, 2007, 2:09 pm |
| FWSM - SAP timeout ? | April 7, 2008, 3:26 pm |
| tftp timeout | June 5, 2009, 9:58 pm |
| exec-timeout on line | November 29, 2005, 11:44 am |
| re:LOCK OBTAIN TIMEOUT | January 14, 2006, 10:15 pm |
| question about timeout conn | April 21, 2006, 11:50 am |

timeout xlate BCP
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 
