|
Posted by chris on June 19, 2008, 12:19 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Hi all,
I ran into an interesting request/problem on my network today. My
marketing team was complaining about getting access to a vendors
portal login page that was running on port 4444 tcp.
I tracked the problem down to a class-map that was intended to block
p2p file sharing applications.
--config snip--
class-map match-any p2p
match protocol fasttrack file-transfer "*"
match protocol gnutella file-transfer "*"
match protocol kazaa2 file-transfer "*"
match protocol napster
!
policy-map block-hogs
class p2p
drop
!
--snip--
I removed the service-policy line in the interface config and the
login portal started working.
Is there an easy way to enable the service-policy while allowing port
4444? I already contacted the company with the dumb port assignment
but they didn't seem to concerned.
Thanks all
chris
|
|
Posted by alexd on June 19, 2008, 5:19 pm
Please log in for more thread options
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:19:09 -0700, chris wrote:
> Hi all,
> I ran into an interesting request/problem on my network today. My
> marketing team was complaining about getting access to a vendors portal
> login page that was running on port 4444 tcp. I tracked the problem down
> to a class-map that was intended to block p2p file sharing applications.
>
> --config snip--
> class-map match-any p2p
> match protocol fasttrack file-transfer "*" match protocol gnutella
> file-transfer "*" match protocol kazaa2 file-transfer "*" match
> protocol napster
> !
Which one of the protocols is it matching? Have you considered removing
the matching line completely? How many genuine hits do you get on each
one?
--
<http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpEaTm@ale.cx)
22:15:41 up 1 day, 21:56, 2 users, load average: 0.08, 0.04, 0.01
Convergence, n: The act of using separate DSL circuits for voice and data
|
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| excluding a port from a "match protocol" class-map | June 19, 2008, 12:19 pm |
| TCP/UDP port or protocol-based routing | February 6, 2006, 3:38 pm |
| Problem with Catalyst 6500 and HP Auto Port Agregation protocol | July 8, 2005, 12:36 am |
| Is this even possible? (Excluding Subnet from Global NAT) | October 11, 2005, 9:28 pm |
| Cisco 877 & DHCP not excluding addresses | July 3, 2006, 6:02 am |
| ASA - Match ACL Command & Radius | November 9, 2006, 3:21 pm |
| Match ip rtp is not supported for this interface | September 21, 2007, 1:27 am |
| NAT Match Host and PIX Alternative | August 5, 2008, 4:19 pm |
| Cisco VPN v3.5.3 - Cannot match policy entry | December 1, 2005, 10:01 pm |
| Correct match with Juniper P-4OC3-SON-SMIR? | April 4, 2006, 3:03 pm |
| VPN tunnel match list overlaps local LAN | November 22, 2006, 9:57 am |
| SIP Error: IP addr does not match with host IP addr | October 9, 2005, 2:19 am |
| ip forwarding-protocol. | July 14, 2005, 5:41 pm |
| Help - qos router protocol | November 3, 2005, 1:15 am |
| ISDN DCP protocol | June 20, 2006, 8:51 am |
> I ran into an interesting request/problem on my network today. My
> marketing team was complaining about getting access to a vendors portal
> login page that was running on port 4444 tcp. I tracked the problem down
> to a class-map that was intended to block p2p file sharing applications.
>
> --config snip--
> class-map match-any p2p
> match protocol fasttrack file-transfer "*" match protocol gnutella
> file-transfer "*" match protocol kazaa2 file-transfer "*" match
> protocol napster
> !