child jitter vs parent shaping vs child class-default on 871 and 1841
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
||||||||||
|
Posted by Robertas on February 23, 2007, 8:28 am
Please log in for more thread options I was wondering in anyone has came across the same problem: Implementing parent policy map with shaping on class-default on Cisco 871 or 1841 will cause higher jitter on child traffic class even if it is LLQ. I guess it should be the same behavior on other Cisco access platforms. Example: policy-map Child class voip priority 500 police 500000 class data bandwidth 400 policy-map Parent class class-default shape average 2000000 service-policy Child Interface FastEthernet 4 service-policy output Parent After trying different burst size parameters on parent shaping I found out that jitter can be minimized by reducing parent shaping burst size. By minimizing this parameter child policy-map reduced default allocated bandwidth to class-default - 15% or even less. Which is not what Cisco tells - 75% + 25%. I know that Cisco does not recommends to tune shaping burst size, but I could not find any other way to reduce jitter. IOS Version: 12.4(9)T1 Regards, Robertas | ||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| child jitter vs parent shaping vs child class-default on 871 and 1841 | February 23, 2007, 8:28 am |
| Jitter Question | June 15, 2007, 4:19 pm |
| Variable jitter with PPP Multilink | May 15, 2007, 12:42 pm |
| how to avoid voip jitter | September 25, 2008, 2:04 am |
| Re: QoS - Traffic Shaping | May 29, 2005, 11:39 am |
| What is better for traffic shaping? | April 6, 2006, 6:15 am |
| 3560 shaping | April 7, 2006, 7:29 am |
| Traffic policing or shaping | August 1, 2005, 2:51 am |
| QoS and Traffic shaping across MPLS? | October 5, 2005, 10:16 am |
| Traffic shaping 3560 | October 2, 2006, 7:19 am |
| Framerelay Traffic Shaping | December 2, 2008, 8:49 am |
| frame-relay adaptive-shaping | July 19, 2005, 4:44 pm |
| Blocking/Shaping Voip traffic | August 9, 2005, 12:32 pm |
| General Cisco shaping problem | July 5, 2006, 3:12 pm |
| Switch shaping/rate-limit | July 12, 2006, 5:33 am |