bridging between 2 ATM subinterfaces/PVC's
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Remco Bressers on August 11, 2005, 5:39 pm
Please log in for more thread options Hi, On a Cisco 7204VXR i want to configure 2 ATM PVC's, bridged together so they can communicate transparently. On the 7204 i configured the interfaces as follows : int atm1/0.162055 point-to-point pvc 16/2055 encap aal5snap bridge-group 1 int atm1/0.162056 point-to-point pvc 16/2056 encap aal5snap bridge-group 1 The bridge group is configured easily like this : bridge 1 protocol ieee According to my theory, the two PVC's should be in bridging mode now. The PVC's are terminated (through a 3rd party network) on DSL routers, where i configured RFC1483, LLC based. On router 1 i configured IP address 10.0.0.1/24 and on the second router 10.0.0.2/24. They don't seem to 'see' eachother in any way and i cannot ping from router 1 to router 2. Can anyone put me in the right direction? Thanks in advance, Remco Bressers | ||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Lars L. Christensen on August 11, 2005, 8:13 pm
Please log in for more thread options You might need to bridge your IP protocol as well. try add "atm route- bridge ip" to the interfaces or "bridge 1 route ip" to your global config. Cheers, Lars Christensen | ||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Remco Bressers on August 12, 2005, 9:21 am
Please log in for more thread options
Lars L. Christensen wrote: >
> >>Hi,
>> >>On a Cisco 7204VXR i want to configure 2 ATM PVC's, bridged together >>so they can communicate transparently. On the 7204 i configured the >>interfaces as follows : >> >>int atm1/0.162055 point-to-point >> pvc 16/2055 >> encap aal5snap >> bridge-group 1 >> >>int atm1/0.162056 point-to-point >> pvc 16/2056 >> encap aal5snap >> bridge-group 1 >> >>The bridge group is configured easily like this : >> >>bridge 1 protocol ieee >> >> >>According to my theory, the two PVC's should be in bridging mode now. >>The PVC's are terminated (through a 3rd party network) on DSL routers, >>where i configured RFC1483, LLC based. On router 1 i configured IP >>address 10.0.0.1/24 and on the second router 10.0.0.2/24. They don't >>seem to 'see' eachother in any way and i cannot ping from router 1 to >>router 2. >> >>Can anyone put me in the right direction? >> >>Thanks in advance, >> >>Remco Bressers >> >
> You might need to bridge your IP protocol as well. try add "atm route- > bridge ip" to the interfaces or "bridge 1 route ip" to your global > config. Isn't it the case that i'm using IRB, and 'atm route-bridge ip' is used for RBE or am i totally wrong? Second.. The term bridge 1 route ip is also not working :( Remco | ||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by aservin on August 12, 2005, 8:39 am
Please log in for more thread options
Have you turned off ip routing? no ip routing no ip routing ! interface Ethernet0/0 no ip address bridge-group 1 ! interface ATM1/0 no ip address ! interface ATM1/0.116 point-to-point pvc 1/116 encapsulation aal5snap ! bridge-group 1 ! bridge 1 protocol ieee http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk39/tk48/technologies_configuration_example09186a008009455f.shtml -as Remco Bressers wrote: > Lars L. Christensen wrote:
> >
> > > >>Hi,
> >> > >>On a Cisco 7204VXR i want to configure 2 ATM PVC's, bridged together > >>so they can communicate transparently. On the 7204 i configured the > >>interfaces as follows : > >> > >>int atm1/0.162055 point-to-point > >> pvc 16/2055 > >> encap aal5snap > >> bridge-group 1 > >> > >>int atm1/0.162056 point-to-point > >> pvc 16/2056 > >> encap aal5snap > >> bridge-group 1 > >> > >>The bridge group is configured easily like this : > >> > >>bridge 1 protocol ieee > >> > >> > >>According to my theory, the two PVC's should be in bridging mode now. > >>The PVC's are terminated (through a 3rd party network) on DSL routers, > >>where i configured RFC1483, LLC based. On router 1 i configured IP > >>address 10.0.0.1/24 and on the second router 10.0.0.2/24. They don't > >>seem to 'see' eachother in any way and i cannot ping from router 1 to > >>router 2. > >> > >>Can anyone put me in the right direction? > >> > >>Thanks in advance, > >> > >>Remco Bressers > >> > >
> > You might need to bridge your IP protocol as well. try add "atm route- > > bridge ip" to the interfaces or "bridge 1 route ip" to your global > > config. >
RBE or am i totally wrong?
> Isn't it the case that i'm using IRB, and 'atm route-bridge ip' is used for > Second.. The term bridge 1 route ip is also not working :(
> > Remco | ||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Remco Bressers on August 17, 2005, 2:56 pm
Please log in for more thread options
No i havent, because the router should do routing, except for these two subinterfaces. aservin wrote: > Have you turned off ip routing?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk39/tk48/technologies_configuration_example09186a008009455f.shtml
> > no ip routing > > no ip routing > ! > interface Ethernet0/0 > no ip address > bridge-group 1 > ! > interface ATM1/0 > no ip address > ! > interface ATM1/0.116 point-to-point > pvc 1/116 > encapsulation aal5snap > ! > bridge-group 1 > ! > bridge 1 protocol ieee > > >
> -as > > > > > Remco Bressers wrote: > >>Lars L. Christensen wrote:
>> >>>
>>> >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>On a Cisco 7204VXR i want to configure 2 ATM PVC's, bridged together >>>>so they can communicate transparently. On the 7204 i configured the >>>>interfaces as follows : >>>> >>>>int atm1/0.162055 point-to-point >>>> pvc 16/2055 >>>> encap aal5snap >>>> bridge-group 1 >>>> >>>>int atm1/0.162056 point-to-point >>>> pvc 16/2056 >>>> encap aal5snap >>>> bridge-group 1 >>>> >>>>The bridge group is configured easily like this : >>>> >>>>bridge 1 protocol ieee >>>> >>>> >>>>According to my theory, the two PVC's should be in bridging mode now. >>>>The PVC's are terminated (through a 3rd party network) on DSL routers, >>>>where i configured RFC1483, LLC based. On router 1 i configured IP >>>>address 10.0.0.1/24 and on the second router 10.0.0.2/24. They don't >>>>seem to 'see' eachother in any way and i cannot ping from router 1 to >>>>router 2. >>>> >>>>Can anyone put me in the right direction? >>>> >>>>Thanks in advance, >>>> >>>>Remco Bressers >>>> >>> >>>You might need to bridge your IP protocol as well. try add "atm route- >>>bridge ip" to the interfaces or "bridge 1 route ip" to your global >>>config. >>
RBE or am i totally wrong?
>>Isn't it the case that i'm using IRB, and 'atm route-bridge ip' is used for >>Second.. The term bridge 1 route ip is also not working :(
>> >>Remco >
> | ||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| bridging to lans | September 8, 2005, 3:55 pm |
| Transparent Bridging | October 27, 2005, 10:02 am |
| bridging over ISDN | September 19, 2006, 6:39 am |
| Cisco 878 bridging? | November 3, 2006, 11:23 am |
| Cisco 1720 - Bridging | July 20, 2005, 8:13 pm |
| bridging between Vlans on Cat. 8510 MSR | July 21, 2005, 7:45 pm |
| bridging between 2 ATM subinterfaces/PVC's | August 11, 2005, 5:39 pm |
| Bridging two different subnets over IRB (urgent) | August 17, 2005, 7:46 am |
| MPLS & transparent bridging | August 19, 2005, 3:33 pm |
| Bridging a Cisco SOHO 96 | November 9, 2005, 10:23 am |
| bridging SNA 3550 2950 | January 26, 2006, 3:59 am |
| Bridging ethernet across 1721 T-1s | July 5, 2005, 9:48 am |
| Bridging with a Cisco 877W | December 21, 2006, 1:11 pm |
| Re: Class-Based QoS and bridging | February 8, 2007, 11:43 pm |
| Bridging NetBEUI over a GRE link | February 11, 2007, 6:19 am |
>
> On a Cisco 7204VXR i want to configure 2 ATM PVC's, bridged together
> so they can communicate transparently. On the 7204 i configured the
> interfaces as follows :
>
> int atm1/0.162055 point-to-point
> pvc 16/2055
> encap aal5snap
> bridge-group 1
>
> int atm1/0.162056 point-to-point
> pvc 16/2056
> encap aal5snap
> bridge-group 1
>
> The bridge group is configured easily like this :
>
> bridge 1 protocol ieee
>
>
> According to my theory, the two PVC's should be in bridging mode now.
> The PVC's are terminated (through a 3rd party network) on DSL routers,
> where i configured RFC1483, LLC based. On router 1 i configured IP
> address 10.0.0.1/24 and on the second router 10.0.0.2/24. They don't
> seem to 'see' eachother in any way and i cannot ping from router 1 to
> router 2.
>
> Can anyone put me in the right direction?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Remco Bressers
>