|
Posted by barret bonden on July 27, 2008, 6:37 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Testing two methods of remote access to an MS Access backend; Terminal
Server and VPN. So far VPN is ahead. Using Cisco Easy VPN client I get an IP
off a PIX, then "net use" it along with it's path, and then open a front end
in Access that's been set to use this path to the back end. So far, so good;
tested with 3 machines simultaneously; two going through the PIX.
It seems better than playing with Terminal Server and licensing; also it
seems to work fine with XP Pro as the "server" ; ( I tested with Server 2003
but then wondered why I was bothering) .
Are there any "gotcha's" awaiting me ?
|
|
Posted by Shishko on July 28, 2008, 2:18 am
Please log in for more thread options
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:37:42 -0400, barret bonden wrote:
>
> It seems better than playing with Terminal Server and licensing; also it
> seems to work fine with XP Pro as the "server" ; ( I tested with Server 2003
> but then wondered why I was bothering) .
>
>
>
> Are there any "gotcha's" awaiting me ?
>
>
There is inbound connections limit in Windows XP that could make
problems...
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314882
|
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Cisco 506e - remote-access vpn, split tunnel, client has no internet access. | November 28, 2006, 11:12 am |
| Cisco Access Concentrator 3005 Access List | July 13, 2006, 3:27 pm |
| access-list addition blocking access to web server !?! | June 23, 2005, 10:49 pm |
| Have traffic access net from dmz with access-list applied | September 15, 2006, 4:26 pm |
| Question on Remote Access VPN Access Control on IOS | January 24, 2007, 11:39 pm |
| Re: Cisco 1300 series wireless access point/bridge Vs Linksys WAP54GPE Access Point Anyone know the basic pros & cons? | November 28, 2007, 6:29 pm |
| Re: Cisco 1300 series wireless access point/bridge Vs Linksys WAP54GPE Access Point Anyone know the basic pros & cons? | November 30, 2007, 4:03 pm |
| Re: Cisco 1300 series wireless access point/bridge Vs Linksys WAP54GPE Access Point Anyone know the basic pros & cons? | December 2, 2007, 5:38 am |
| my access-list allows SQL access? | June 12, 2006, 5:38 pm |
| VLAN port with internet access can access only one vlan? | April 21, 2006, 3:38 pm |
| Trying to access the PDM of a Cisco pix over a Remote Access VPN with Cisco VPN Client | September 7, 2008, 10:57 am |
| PDM access by the web | September 8, 2005, 6:15 pm |
| RAS access | September 27, 2005, 4:55 am |
| Cannot access PIX 501 PDM | October 15, 2005, 1:35 pm |
| PIX SSH access | October 6, 2006, 12:14 pm |
access Access via PIX ? 
Yahoo!
Google
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
> It seems better than playing with Terminal Server and licensing; also it
> seems to work fine with XP Pro as the "server" ; ( I tested with Server 2003
> but then wondered why I was bothering) .
>
>
>
> Are there any "gotcha's" awaiting me ?
>
>