Cisco Systems Router interface utilization

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Router interface utilization terrydoc@o2.ie 06-12-08
Posted by terrydoc@o2.ie on June 12, 2008, 7:25 am
Please log in for more thread options
Hi, how do you calculate the interface utilization -
e.g. reliability 255/255, txload 100/255, rxload 122/255 - do you
total the 100 (txload) and 122(rxload), get 222 and say the
utilization on the interface is (222/255) 88%


Posted by Trendkill on June 12, 2008, 7:35 am
Please log in for more thread options
> Hi, how do you calculate the interface utilization -
> e.g. reliability 255/255, txload 100/255, rxload 122/255 - do you
> total the 100 (txload) and 122(rxload), get 222 and say the
> utilization on the interface is (222/255) 88%

No, the transmit and receive are mutually exclusive. tx is transmit,
rx is receive, and therefore you treat them differently. I suppose
you could aggregate them and then take it over 510, but I can't think
of any real reason to look at it that way. Additionally, the tx/rx
are averaged over a set amount of time if I recall correctly, like 5
minutes, but its using some specific calculation. Since bandwidth on
circuits is full duplex (1.5 meg transmit AND 1.5 meg receive on a T1
for example), you do not aggregate tx and rx.

http://www.staticnat.com/WP/2007/03/07/reliability-255255-txload-1255-rxload-1255-what-does-it-really-mean/

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/inter/command/reference/int_s3gt.html

Posted by Trendkill on June 12, 2008, 7:41 am
Please log in for more thread options
>
> > Hi, how do you calculate the interface utilization -
> > e.g. reliability 255/255, txload 100/255, rxload 122/255 - do you
> > total the 100 (txload) and 122(rxload), get 222 and say the
> > utilization on the interface is (222/255) 88%
>
> No, the transmit and receive are mutually exclusive. tx is transmit,
> rx is receive, and therefore you treat them differently. I suppose
> you could aggregate them and then take it over 510, but I can't think
> of any real reason to look at it that way. Additionally, the tx/rx
> are averaged over a set amount of time if I recall correctly, like 5
> minutes, but its using some specific calculation. Since bandwidth on
> circuits is full duplex (1.5 meg transmit AND 1.5 meg receive on a T1
> for example), you do not aggregate tx and rx.
>
> http://www.staticnat.com/WP/2007/03/07/reliability-255255-txload-1255...
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/inter/command/reference/int...

So using your numbers, transmit is 100/255 or 39.2% utilized, and
receive is 122/255 or 47.8% utilization.

Similar ThreadsPosted
Router interface utilization June 12, 2008, 7:25 am
CPU utilization on the router. October 14, 2005, 5:37 pm
How to see frag/defrag utilization of the router. November 25, 2005, 11:20 am
Setting up a router with 29 Global IPs, BUT can't ping router internal interface from server or server interface from router December 11, 2005, 10:37 am
How to convert a fast ethernet interface in a Cisco Router to behave like a serial interface March 18, 2006, 8:48 am
Trusted Interface in Router October 3, 2006, 2:00 pm
Utilization May 20, 2006, 6:53 am
Ethernet2 interface on Cisco Router 836 October 12, 2006, 11:13 am
Which is the OID for the error CRC on interface router cisco August 29, 2007, 4:37 pm
allow PING from outside to router vlan interface October 23, 2008, 2:20 pm
MAC Address and Logical Router Interface November 5, 2008, 5:59 pm
WAN Utilization Question August 4, 2006, 11:35 am
Monitoring WAN utilization July 25, 2007, 8:54 am
Cisco 2611 router interface issues February 8, 2008, 5:42 pm
High CPU utilization on C3700 ??? October 18, 2005, 11:31 pm