|
Posted by Darren Green on August 5, 2008, 4:19 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Hi,
I need to NAT between 2 x networks matching the host element so that my
host in LAN 1 is translated to the same host address in LAN 2 e.g.
192.168.1.1 NAT's to 192.168.2.1
192.168.1.2 NAT's to 192.168.2.2
192.168.1.100 NAT's to 192.168.2.100..... etc
Ordinarily I would use the NAT 'match host' command on a router but I
assume I can do this on a PIX by doing something like
nat (inside, outside) 192.168.2.0 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
I don't have a PIX to hand to confirm that the mappings on the host
portion will be identical. Anyone know off the top of their heads.
Regards
Darren
|
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| NAT Match Host and PIX Alternative | August 5, 2008, 4:19 pm |
| SIP Error: IP addr does not match with host IP addr | October 9, 2005, 2:19 am |
| ASA - Match ACL Command & Radius | November 9, 2006, 3:21 pm |
| Match ip rtp is not supported for this interface | September 21, 2007, 1:27 am |
| Cisco VPN v3.5.3 - Cannot match policy entry | December 1, 2005, 10:01 pm |
| Correct match with Juniper P-4OC3-SON-SMIR? | April 4, 2006, 3:03 pm |
| VPN tunnel match list overlaps local LAN | November 22, 2006, 9:57 am |
| excluding a port from a "match protocol" class-map | June 19, 2008, 12:19 pm |
| Cisco ACS Alternative? | February 7, 2005, 1:49 pm |
| Nat-traversal alternative? | March 17, 2007, 6:25 pm |
| Alternative for cisco vpn concentrator | November 23, 2007, 8:41 am |
| Alternative to Cisco website for downloading VPN client? | November 26, 2007, 3:24 pm |
| Cisco PIX 501 - Port forwarded to an internal host via Static NAT doesn't work from internal host | January 19, 2006, 4:46 pm |
| CAT6509 router or L3 switch? alternative Low-end L3 switches/router? | August 16, 2006, 3:05 am |
| PIX 501 and PAT going to wrong host | August 26, 2005, 2:17 pm |